Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:52:00.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Don't Fence Me In: Barricade Sociality and Political Struggles in Mexico and Latvia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2012

Dace Dzenovska*
Affiliation:
University of Latvia
Iván Arenas
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago
*
Corresponding author: Dace Dzenovska ([email protected]).

Abstract

In 1991, barricades in the streets of Rīga, Latvia, shielded important landmarks from Soviet military units looking to prevent the dissolution of the USSR; in 2006, barricades in the streets of Oaxaca, Mexico, defended members of the Popular Assembly of the Peoples of Oaxaca from paramilitary incursions. We employ these two cases to compare the historically specific public socialities and politics formed through spatial and material practices in moments of crisis and in their aftermath. We show how the barricades continue to animate social and political formations and imaginaries, providing a sense of both past solidarity and future possibilities against which the present, including the state of the polity and the life of the people, are assessed. We trace the convergences and differences of political imaginaries of barricade sociality that formed in the barricades’ aftermath and consider what their transformative potential might be. Attentive to the specificity of particular practices and social relations that produce a collective subject, we consider how our case studies might inform broader questions about social collectives like the nation and publics. Though they point in different directions, we argue that the barricades provide an enabling position from which to imagine and organize collective life otherwise. In a moment when much mainstream political activism remains spellbound by the allure of discourses of democracy that promise power to the people, the Mexico and Latvia cases provide examples of social life that exceeded both state-based notions of collectives and what Michael Warner has called “state-based thinking,” even as they were also entangled with state-based frames.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

de Aguinaga, Fernando Gálvez. 2007. Ulises, el mago que desapareció los poderes. In Torres, Carlos Beas, ed., La batalla por Oaxaca. Oaxaca, Mexico: Yope Power, 117–20.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1970. Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes Towards an Investigation). In Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays. Brewster, Ben, trans. New York: Monthly Review Press, 127–86.Google Scholar
Arellanes Meixueiro, Anselmo. 2007. Zócalo destruido, pueblo enfurecido. Cuadernos del Sur 12, 24/25: 139–48.Google Scholar
Arenas, Iván. 2011. Rearticulating the Social: Spatial Practices, Collective Subjects, and Oaxaca's Art of Protest. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Arenas, Iván and Dzenovska, Dace. 2010. Making ‘the People’: Political Imaginaries and the Materiality of Barricades in Mexico and Latvia. In Heredia, Mariana and Kirtchik, Olessia, eds., “Former USSR and Latin America: Studies in Post-Authoritarian Transformations.” Laboratorium: The Russian Social Sciences Review 2 (special issue): 179–99.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hanna. 1968. On Revolution. New York: The Viking Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hanna. 1979. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harvest/HBJ.Google Scholar
Bicēna, Baiba. 2010. Barikāžu laiks: apvērsums. 1991. Gada pieraksti. Riga: Zvaigzne ABC.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of Injury. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchli, Victor, ed. 2002. The Material Culture Reader. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Buck-Morss, Susan. 2000. Dreamworld and Catastrophe: The Passing of Mass Utopia in East and West. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Steven, Rendall, trans. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cowan, Jane. 2007. The Supervised State. Identities 14, 5: 545–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daugmalis, Viktors, ed. 2001a. Barikādes: Latvijas mīlestības grāmata. Riga: Barikāžu atbalsta fonds.Google Scholar
Daugmalis, Viktors. 2001b. Barikādes. Riga: Barikāžu atbalsta fonds.Google Scholar
Davies, Nancy. 2007. The People Decide: Oaxaca's Popular Assembly. New York: Narco News Books.Google Scholar
Diakonie and the International Commission of Jurists. 2007. Informe de la visita de la Comisión Internacional de Juristas y la obra Diacónica Alemana a Oaxaca, México. At: http://www.serapaz.org.mx/paginas/Informe%20Oaxaca%20Noviembre%202007.pdf (accessed 15 Mar. 2012).Google Scholar
Donham, Donald. 1998. Freeing South Africa: The ‘Modernization’ of Male-Male Sexuality in Soweto. Cultural Anthropology 13, 1: 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doumani, Beshara. 2011. Arab Uprisings and Middle East Studies: Roundtable with Beshara Doumani, Charles Hirschkind, Saba Mahmood, and Stefanial Pandolfo. Jadaliyya, 17 May. At: http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/1607/arab-uprisings-and-middle-east-studies_roundtable- (accessed 15 Mar. 2012).Google Scholar
Dribins, Leo. 1997. Nacionālais jautājums Latvijā, 1850–1940: historiogrāfisks apskats. Riga: Mācību apgāds.Google Scholar
Dzenovska, Dace. 2009. Provoking Tolerance: History, Sense of Self, and Difference in Latvia. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Dzenovska, Dace. n.d. How to Be a Minority: The Politics of Conduct and Difference in the New Europe. MS in preparation.Google Scholar
Eiss, Paul K. 2008. El Pueblo Mestizo: Modernity, Tradition, and Statecraft in Yucatán, 1870–1907. Ethnohistory 55, 4: 525–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteva, Gustavo. 2007. La otra campaña, la APPO y la izquierda: reivindicar una alternativa. Cuadernos del Sur 12, 24/25 (Nov.): 737.Google Scholar
Esteva, Gustavo. 2008. Crónica de un movimiento anunciado. In Cuando hasta las piedras se levantan. Oaxaca, México, 2006. Buenos Aires: Editorial Antropofagia, 2189. Also at: http://www.ger-gemsal.org.ar/files/pdf/libros/cuandohastalaspiedras.pdf (accessed 15 Mar. 2012).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988. The Subject and Power. In Dreyfus, Hubert F. and Rabinow, Paul, eds., Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 208–26.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1994. On Governmentality. In Faubion, James D., ed., The Essential Works of Foucault, Volume 3 (Power). New York: The New Press, 201–22.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2003. Society Must Be Defended. Macey, David, trans. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Gamio, Manuel. 2010 [1916]. Forjando Patria: Pro-nacionalismo. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Gay, José Antonio. 2006 [1881]. História de Oaxaca. Oaxaca: Editorial Porrua.Google Scholar
Gijsbers, Wim. 2007. David Venegas: la barricada y la resistencia social. In Torres, Carlos Beas, ed., La batalla por Oaxaca. Oaxaca: Yope Power, 243–48.Google Scholar
Gobiņš, Mārcis. 2006. Geju praida aizliegums Satversmes 110. panta gaismā. politika.lv, 31 July. At: http://archive.politika.lv/temas/cilvektiesibas/20534/ (accessed 15 Aug. 2010).Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Hoare, Quintin and Smith, Geoffrey Nowell, eds. and trans. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 2007. Kinds of People, Moving Targets. British Academy Lecture delivered on 11 Apr. At: www.proc.britac.ac.uk/tfiles/151p285.pdf (accessed 15 June, but at time of the present publication the link no longer worked).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David. 1973. Social Justice and the City. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Hirschkind, Charles. 2011a. Uprising in Egypt: The Road to Tahrir. In VanAntwerpen, Jonathan, ed., The Immanent Frame: Secularism, Religion, and the Public Sphere. Social Science Research Council. At: http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2011/02/09/the-road-to-tahrir/ (accessed 15 Mar. 2012).Google Scholar
Hirschkind, Charles. 2011b. How Do We Define U.S. Interests in Egypt? San Francisco Chronicle, 8 Feb. At: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/02/08/EDCI1HJVFB.DTL (accessed 15 Mar. 2012).Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 2003. Democracy and the Foreigner. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kazans, Jānis. 2008. Ko glabā to dienu atmiņas? At: www.liepajniekiem.lv/lat/zinas/aktuali/2008/01/17/pagtne-ietamba-stenba/ (accessed 5 Sept. 2009).Google Scholar
Kourí, Emilio H. 2002. Interpreting the Expropriation of Indian Pueblo Lands in Porfirian Mexico: The Unexamined Legacies of Andrés Molina Enríquez. Hispanic American Historical Review 82, 1: 69117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 2007. On Populist Reason. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 1995 [1974]. The Production of Space. Nicholson-Smith, Donald, trans. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 2000 [1968]. Writings on Cities. Kofman, Eleonore and Lebas, Elizabeth, eds. and trans. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Lepinay, Vincent-Antonin. 2007. Economy of the Germ: Capital, Accumulation, and Vibration. Economy and Society 36, 4: 526–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomnitz, Claudio. 2001. Deep Mexico, Silent Mexico: An Anthropology of Nationalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mallon, Florencia E. 1995. Peasant and Nation: The Making of Postcolonial Mexico and Peru. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez, Vásquez, Raúl, Víctor. 2007. Autoritarismo, Movimiento Popular y Crisis Política: Oaxaca 2006. Oaxaca: Carteles Editores—P.G.O.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1990 [1867]. Karl Marx: Selected Writings. McLellan, David, ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Massad, Joseph. 2007. Desiring Arabs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Daniel, ed. 2005. Materiality. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Don. 2003. The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 1991. The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics. American Political Science Review 85, 1: 7796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohan, Giles and Stokke, Kritian. 2000. Participatory Development and Empowerment: The Dangers of Localism. Third World Quarterly 21, 2: 247–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, Ilze. 2007. Naids kā sāpīgs bumerangs. Sestdiena, 2 July. At: www.diena.lv/arhivs/naids-ka-sapigs-bumerangs-13152138 (accessed 16 Mar. 2012).Google Scholar
Poole, Deborah. 2004. An Image of ‘Our Indian’: Type Photographs and Racial Sentiments in Oaxaca 1920–1940. Hispanic American Historical Review 84, 1: 3782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purs, Aldis. 2002. The Price of Free Lunches: Making the Interwar Latvia in the Frontier. Global Review of Ethnopolitics 1, 4: 6073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. 2004. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. Rockhill, Gabriel trans. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Schneider, Nathan. 2011. The Suspicious Revolution: An Interview with Talal Asad. In VanAntwerpen, Jonathan, ed., The Immanent Frame: Secularism, Religion, and the Public Sphere. Social Science Research Council. At: http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2011/08/03/the-suspicious-revolution-int (accessed 10 Aug. 2011).Google Scholar
Silova, Iveta. 2006. From the Sites of Occupation to Symbols of Multiculturalism: Reconceptualizing Minority Education in Post-Soviet Latvia. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Slezkine, Yuri. 1994. The USSR as a Communal Apartment, or How a Socialist State Promoted Ethnic Particularism. Slavic Review 53, 2: 414–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soja, Edward W. 2010. Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L., eds., Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 271313.Google Scholar
Stukuls Eglitis, Daina. 2002. Imagining the Nation: History, Modernity and Revolution in Latvia. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2007. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Marc. 2010. The Insurgent Barricade. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, José. 1997 [1925]. The Cosmic Race/La raza cósmica. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Michael. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. 2005. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Watts, Michael. 2004. Antinomies of Community: Some Thoughts on Geography, Resources and Empire. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (New Series) 29, 2: 195216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitz, Eric D. 2008. From the Vienna to the Paris System: International Politics and the Entangled Histories of Human Rights, Forced Deportations, and Civilizing Missions. American Historical Review (Dec.): 1313–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Jonathan. 2011. Tahrir Square behind the Barricades. At: http://jnthnwrght.blogspot.com/2011/02/tahrir-square-behind-barricades.html (accessed 15 Mar. 2012).Google Scholar
Younis, Jumanah. 2011. Egypt's Revolution Means Nothing if It's Women Are not Free. Guardian, 9 Mar. At: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/09/egypt-revolution-women?INTCMP=SRCH (accessed 15 Mar. 2012).Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. 2001. How Did Marx Invent the Symptom? In The Sublime Object of Ideology. New York: Verso, 1154.Google Scholar