Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:51:15.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Aboriginal Alibi: Governing Dispossession in Colonial Bombay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2018

Sheetal Chhabria
Sheetal Chhabria*
Affiliation:
Connecticut College
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes representations of the Koli as aboriginal in colonial Bombay, and explores the ends to which various actors have narrated Koli aboriginality. It examines the relationship between the historical deployment of the concept of aboriginality and its mediating role in the power of capital and state-making practices in one colonial urban context. The article shows how the Koli, as Bombay's “aboriginals,” gained concessions that served as an alibi for the market-based dispossession of the remainder of the city's population, and also as a pretext for claim-making by peoples with competing collective identities who used the tale of Koli identity and history as a narrative resource to argue for their own nativity. The Koli case helps us understand the co-emergence of the powers of caste and capital in Bombay, and compels us to revisit important, broader questions about relationships between aboriginal or indigenous peoples, capitalism, colonialism, liberalism, and governance.

Keywords

aboriginalindigenouscapitalismcolonialismcolonial cityliberalismBombayMumbaiKolikoliwadas
Type
Edges of Sovereignty
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , October 2018 , pp. 1096 - 1126
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A similar narrative trope of a once isolated fishing village becoming a colonial city exists for both Karachi and Calcutta. The name “Karachi” is said to have derived from a fisherwoman named Mai Kolachi, and it is sometimes claimed that the fishing peoples, Mohonas, are the city's original inhabitants. Between the 1970s and the 1990s, the Mohonas became Islamicized, and their history is continuously being rewritten. See Hasan, Arif, The Unplanned Revolution: Observations on the Process of Socio-Economic Changes in Pakistan (Karachi: Karachi City Press, 2002)Google Scholar. In Calcutta, “aboriginal peoples like the Jeliyas, Duliayas, Nikaris and Bagdis—fishermen, falconers, and hunters by profession,” lent credibility to the notion that the city's name derived from the Bengali terms for the digging of canals by early fishermen. See Bhattacharyya, Debjani, “Geography's Myth: The Many Origins of Calcutta.” in Unarchived Histories: The “Mad” and the “Trifling” in the Colonial and Postcolonial World (New York: Routledge, 2013), 144–58Google Scholar. For an excellent critical account of how the narration of Calcutta's origins supported the idea of colonial fiat on traditional terrain, see the “Introduction” of Chattopadhyay, Swati. Representing Calcutta: Modernity, Nationalism, and the Colonial Uncanny (London; New York: Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar.

2 Lonely Planet: India, 10th ed., (n.p., India: Lonely Planet Publications, 2003), 736Google Scholar.

3 DK Eyewitness Travel Guide (New York: DK Publishing, 2002), 443Google Scholar.

4 Michael Hathaway. 2010. “The Emergence of Indigeneity: Public Intellectuals and an Indigenous Space in Southwest China,” Cultural Anthropology 25, 2: 301–33.

5 Hansen, Thomas Blom, Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar.

6 Searle, Llerena, Landscapes of Accumulation: Real Estate and the Neoliberal Imagination in Contemporary India (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016), 239CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Li, Tania Murray, “Indigeneity, Capitalism, and the Management of Dispossession,” Current Anthropology 51, 3 (2010): 385–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 410.

8 Mitchell, Dean, “A Genealogy of the Government of Poverty,” Economy and Society 21, 3 (1992): 215–51, 220Google Scholar.

9 Foucault, Michel, The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language (New York: Pantheon Books, 1972.), 21Google Scholar.

10 Dirks, Nicholas B., The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom. Cambridge South Asian Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)Google Scholar.

11 The Koli were classified as a “caste” as opposed to a “tribe” in Western India due to their taking up of settled agriculture according to Ajay Skaria; see his “Shades of Wildness: Tribe, Caste, and Gender in Western India,” Journal of Asian Studies 56, 3 (1997): 726–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 731–32.

12 Conlon, Frank, “Industrialization and the Housing Problem in Bombay, 1850–1940,” Changing South Asia 4 (1984): 153–68Google Scholar; Dossal, Mariam, Theatre of Conflict, City of Hope: Mumbai, 1660 to Present Times (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar; Harris, Richard and Lewis, Robert, “Segregation and the Social Relations of Place, Bombay, 1890–1910,” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 36, 4 (2013): 589–607Google Scholar.

13 King, Anthony D., Colonial Urban Development: Culture, Social Power, and Environment (London: Routledge, 1976)Google Scholar.

14 Patel, Sujata and Thorner, Alice, Bombay: Mosaic of Modern Culture (Bombay: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

15 Lewis and Harris, “Segregation,” 593.

16 Dwyer, D. J., People and Housing in Third World Cities: Perspectives on the Problem of Spontaneous Settlements (New York: Longman, 1975)Google Scholar.

17 Chandavarkar, Rajnarayan, The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India: Business Strategies and the Working Classes in Bombay, 1900–1940 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Boeke, J. H., Economics and Economic Policy of Dual Societies, as Exemplified by Indonesia. (Haarlem: H. D. Tjeenk Willink, 1953)Google Scholar.

19 Chattopadhyay, Swati, Representing Calcutta: Modernity, Nationalism, and the Colonial Uncanny (New York: Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar.

20 Chopra, Preeti, A Joint Enterprise: Indian Elites and the Making of British Bombay (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Glover, William J., Making Lahore Modern: Constructing and Imagining a Colonial City (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008)Google Scholar; Haynes, Douglas E. and Rao, Nikhil, “Beyond the Colonial City: Re-Evaluating the Urban History of India, ca. 1920–1970,” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 36, 3 (2013): 317–35Google Scholar; Hazareesingh, Colonial City; Hosagrahar, Jyoti, Indigenous Modernities: Negotiating Architecture and Urbanism, Architext Series (New York: Routledge, 2005)Google Scholar; Dossal, Mariam, Imperial Designs and Indian Realities: The Planning of Bombay City, 1845–1875 (Delhi and New York: Oxford University Press, Oxford India Paperbacks, 1996)Google Scholar; Datta, Partho, Planning the City: Urbanization and Reform in Calcutta c. 1800–1940 (New Delhi: Tulika Books, 2012)Google Scholar.

21 A sample of literature debating the status of liberalism in colonial India includes: Bayly, C. A., Recovering Liberties: Indian Thought in the Age of Liberalism and Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kolsky, Elizabeth, “The Colonial Rule of Law and the Legal Regime of Exception: Frontier ‘Fanaticism’ and State Violence in British India,” American Historical Review 120, 4 (2015): 1218–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mantena, Karuna, Alibis of Empire: Henry Maine and the Ends of Liberal Imperialism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mehta, Uday Singh, Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Sartori, Andrew, Liberalism in Empire (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014)Google Scholar.

22 Barry, Andrew, Osborne, Thomas, and Rose, Nikolas, Foucault and Political Reason (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), 10Google Scholar.

23 Foucault, Michel, “Spaces of Security: The Example of the Town. Lecture of 11th January 1978,” Political Geography 26 (2007): 48–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Joyce, Patrick, The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the Modern City (New York: Verso, 2003)Google Scholar.

24 Public Diary 63 of 1773, 196–97; Public Diary 65 of 1774, 306; “Houses & Fortifications,” from Bombay Town and Island History (Bombay: Times of India Press, 1901), 481Google Scholar.

25 Dossal, Theatre of Conflict, 89.

26 Perlin, Frank, “Proto-Industrialization and Pre-Colonial South Asia,” Past and Present 98 (1983): 30–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 81.

27 Numerous scholars of premodern Asia have focused on Early Modern dynamism across inland regions and coastal societies along the Indian Ocean. See Abu-Lughod, Janet L., Before European Hegemony: The World System A.D. 1250–1350 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar; Chaudhuri, K. N., Trade and Civilization in the Indian Ocean: An Economic History from the Rise of Islam to 1750 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Frank, Andre Gunder, Reorient: Global Economy in the Asian Age (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998)Google Scholar; Ludden, David E., Early Capitalism and Local History in South India, 2d ed. (Delhi and New York: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

28 Perlin, “Proto-Industrialization,” 32–34.

29 Marshall, P. J., The Eighteenth Century in Indian History: Evolution or Revolution? Oxford in India Readings, Themes in Indian History (New Delhiand Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar; Travers, Robert, “The Eighteenth Century in Indian History: A Review Essay,” Eighteenth Century Studies 40 (Spring 2007): 492–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Perlin, “Proto-Industrialization,” 45–46.

31 Subrahmanyam, Sanjay and Bayly, C. A., “Portfolio Capitalists and the Political Economy of Early Modern India,” Indian Economic & Social History Review 25, 4 (1988): 401–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 “Correspondence about Salsette Island,” India Office Records, British Library, London, IOR/H/334, 42–43.

33 Dossal, Theatre of Conflict, 76–92.

34 Edwardes, S. M. and Campbell, James MacNabb, The Gazetteer of Bombay City and Island (Bombay: Times Press, 1909), 119Google Scholar.

35 Ibid., 76.

36 “Correspondence about Salsette Island,” 194; my italics.

37 Ibid., 26.

38 Ibid., 92–97.

39 Ibid., 49.

40 Ibid., 77.

41 Ibid., 95.

42 Ibid., 79.

43 Banerjee, Prathama, “Debt, Time and Extravagance: Money and the Making of ‘Primitives’ in Colonial Bengal,” Indian Economic & Social History Review 37, 4 (2000): 423–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Politics of Time: “Primitives” and History-Writing in a Colonial Society (New Delhi and New York: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Ghosh, Kaushik, “Between Global Flows and Local Dams: Indigenousness, Locality, and the Transnational Sphere in Jharkhand, India,” Cultural Anthropology 21, 4 (2012): 501–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 “Correspondence about Salsette Island,” 24.

45 “Houses & Fortifications,” 478.

46 Dossal, Theatre of Conflict, 85–89.

47 “Houses & Fortifications,” 480.

48 Ibid.: 476.

49 Dossal, Theatre of Conflict, 111.

50 Menon, Meena and Adarkar, Neera, One Hundred Years One Hundred Voices: The Millworkers of Girangaon: An Oral History (Calcutta: Seagull Books, 2004)Google Scholar; Chandavarkar, Origins of Industrial Capitalism.

51 Census on City and Island of Bombay, 1881: 37.

52 Today there are many sub-castes of Kolis, many of whom are not fishermen. This discussion is largely limited to the representations of the Koli of colonial Bombay.

53 Government of Maharashtra, Maharashtra State Gazetteers, Ratnagiri District Gazetteer, “Koli Outrages,” 1978: https://gazetteers.maharashtra.gov.in/Ratnagiri%20District/Ratnagiri%20District.pdf.

54 Guha, Sumit, Environment and Ethnicity in India, 1200–1991 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), esp. 95–99Google Scholar.

55 Dirks, Nicholas B., Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001), 208Google Scholar.

56 “Public Diaries” from the 1760s speak of “Coolies,” which the civil servant Stephen M. Edwardes’ refers to as “Kolis” in the early 1900s. See Maharashtra State Archives, Public Diary 63 of 1773 (see also note 24), as well as sources cited by Edwardes and Murphy.

57 Roy, Shibani, Koli Culture: A Profile of the Culture of Talpad Vistar (New Delhi: Cosmo, 1983)Google Scholar; Punekar, Vinaja, Son Kolis of Bombay (Bombay: Popular Book Depot, 1959)Google Scholar.

58 R. X. Murphy, Esq., “Remarks on the History of some of the Oldest Races now Settled on Bombay,” Transactions of the Bombay Geographical Society, 1838.

59 For help with the translation and original Marathi text, I thank Dean Accardi, Kedar Kullkarni, and Shatrunjay Mall.

60 Ghosh, “Between Global Flows,” 505.

61 Madagavakara, Govinda Narayana, Mumbaichee Varnan, Ranganathan, Murali, trans. (London: Anthem Press, 2008), 62–63Google Scholar.

62 For the critique of this periodization, see Thapar, Romila, “Imagined Religious Communities? Ancient History and the Modern Search for a Hindu Identity,” Modern Asian Studies 23, 2 (1989): 209–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and “Ideology and the Interpretation of Early Indian History,” Social Science Information 20, 2 (1981): 239–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Narayana, Govind Narayan's Mumbai, 62.

64 J. Gerson da (Joseph Gerson) Cunha, The Origin of Bombay (Bombay: Society's Library, 1900), 41Google Scholar.

65 Risley, H. H., “The Study of Ethnology in India.” Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 20 (1891): 235–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

66 Thapar, Romila, “The Theory of Aryan Race and India: History and Politics,” Social Scientist 24, 1/3 (1996): 3–29Google Scholar.

67 Trautmann, Thomas R., Aryans and British India (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), 194CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Carter, Paul, The Road to Botany Bay: An Exploration of Landscape and History (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69 Edwardes, Stephen M., The Rise of Bombay: A Retrospect, repr. from Census of India Series, vol. 10 of 1901 (Times of India Press, 1902)Google Scholar.

70 Ibid., 226–27.

71 Edwardes, Stephen M., The Population of the City of Bombay: A Few Remarks Concerning Its Origin and Growth, repr. from “The Indian Antiquary,” vol. 55 (Bombay: British India Press, Mazagaon, 1926), 209–15Google Scholar, 235–38.

72 Albuquerque, Teresa, Urbs Prima in Indis: An Epoch in the History of Bombay, 1840–1865 (New Delhi: Promilla, 1985), xiiiGoogle Scholar.

73 Subramanian, Ajantha, Shorelines: Space and Rights in South India (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009), 6–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 Goswami, Manu, Producing India: From Colonial Economy to National Space (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Chicago Studies in Practices of Meaning, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

75 Beverley, Eric, “Colonial Urbanism and South Asian Cities,” Social History 36, 4 (2011): 482–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Leonard, John G., “Urban Government under the Raj: A Case Study of Municipal Administration in Nineteenth-Century South India,” Modern Asian Studies 7, 2 (1973): 227–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

76 Hazareesingh, Sandip, The Colonial City and the Challenge of Modernity: Urban Hegemonies and Civic Contestations in Bombay (Hyderabad: Orient Longman, 2007)Google Scholar.

77 Haynes, Douglas E., Rhetoric and Ritual in Colonial India: The Shaping of a Public Culture in Surat City, 1852–1928 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991)Google Scholar.

78 Seal, Anil, The Emergence of Indian Nationalism: Competition and Collaboration in the Later Nineteenth Century, Political Change in Modern South Asia, vol. 1 (London: Cambridge University Press, 1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

79 Government of Bombay, General, vol. 29, compilation 194, pt. 1, 1905, Maharashtra State Archives, quoted in Kidambi, Prashant, The Making of an Indian Metropolis: Colonial Governance and Public Culture in Bombay, 1890–1920 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), 80Google Scholar.

80 Kidambi, Making of an Indian Metropolis, 81.

81 In the modern era halalkhor came to mean one for whom everything is “halal” and thus consumable. This may be an inversion of its early modern meaning.

82 Municipal Commissioner's Report, City of Bombay, 1872: 54.

83 “Colaba Development (Eastern Section) Preliminary Report,” by Mirams in Poona, British Library, London, ORW [I do not know the acronym's referent] 1996 B6, 1916.

84 Ibid., 3.

85 Ibid., 3–4.

86 Ibid., 4–5.

87 Ibid., 8.

88 Wood, Ellen Meiksins, The Origin of Capitalism (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

89 Ortner, Sherry, “Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 26, 1 (1984): 126–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 143. For a response to Ortner's overview, see Appadurai, Arjun, “Theory in Anthropology: Center and Periphery,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 28, 2 (1986): 356–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90 David E. Ludden, Early Capitalism, 216.

91 Brenner, Neil and Schmid, Christian, “The ‘Urban Age’ in Question,” International Journal of Urban & Regional Research 38, 3 (2013): 731–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

92 Koli, N. D., “Fishworkers’ Demands,” Economic and Political Weekly 36, 1 (6–12 Jan. 2001): 80Google Scholar.

93 Ghosh, “Between Global Flows,” 513.

94 United Nations Human Settlements Programme, The Challenge of Slums: Global Report on Human Settlements, 2003 (London: Earthscan Publications, 2003)Google Scholar.

95 Weinstein, Liza, “‘One-Man Handled’: Fragmented Power and Political Entrepreneurship in Globalizing Mumbai,” in Shatkin, Gavin, ed., Contesting the Indian City: Global Visions and the Politics of the Local (London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014)Google Scholar.

96 Weinstein, Liza, The Durable Slum: Dharavi and the Right to Stay Put in Globalizing Mumbai (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014), 155Google Scholar.

97 Baviskar, A., “Adivasi Encounters with Hindu Nationalism in MP,” Economic and Political Weekly 40, 48 (26 Dec. 2005): 5105–13Google Scholar.

98 Foucault, Michel, The Birth of Biopolitics—Lectures at the Collège (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 65Google Scholar.

99 Weinstein, Durable Slum.

100 Hegde, Sandeep, “Son Kolis—The Aboriginal Inhabitants of Bombay (Now Mumbai) in Transition,” International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 62 (2015): 140–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.