Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:55:41.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fluoroscopic study of oral behaviours in response to the presence of a bit and the effects of rein tension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2010

Jane M Manfredi ,
Diana Rosenstein ,
Joel L Lanovaz ,
Sandra Nauwelaerts  and
Hilary M Clayton
Jane M Manfredi
Affiliation:
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI48824-1314, USA
Diana Rosenstein
Affiliation:
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI48824-1314, USA
Joel L Lanovaz
Affiliation:
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI48824-1314, USA
Sandra Nauwelaerts
Affiliation:
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI48824-1314, USA
Hilary M Clayton*
Affiliation:
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI48824-1314, USA
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This study investigated intra-oral behaviours in horses wearing different bits with and without rein tension. Six riding horses wore a bridle and three bits: jointed snaffle, KK Ultra and Myler comfort snaffle. Lateral fluoroscopic images (30 Hz) were recorded for 20 s for each bit with loose reins and with 25 ± 5 N bilateral rein tension. The videos were analysed to determine time spent in the following behaviours: mouth quiet, gently mouthing the bit, retracting the tongue, bulging the dorsum of the tongue over the bit, lifting the bit and other behaviours that were performed infrequently. Repeated-measures ANOVA indicated that behaviours did not differ between bits, so bit type was not predictive of behaviour, but there were significant effects of horse and rein tension. Horses spent less time quiet and more time mouthing the bit, retracting the tongue and bulging the tongue over the bit when tension was applied.

Keywords

horsebitoral cavityfluoroscopyrider communication
Type
Research Paper
Information
Comparative Exercise Physiology , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , November 2009 , pp. 143 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Anon. (2009). Rules for Dressage Events. Lausanne: Fédération Équestre Internationale.Google Scholar
2 Cook, WR (1999). Pathophysiology of bit control. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 19: 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Tell, A, Egenvall, A, Torbjörn, L and Wattle, O (2008). The prevalence of oral ulceration in Swedish horses when ridden with bit and bridle and when unridden. Veterinary Journal 178: 405–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Johnson, TJ (2002). Surgical removal of mandibular periostitis (bone spurs) caused by bit damage. Proceedings of the American Association of Equine Practitioners 48: 458–462.Google Scholar
5 Clayton, HM and Lee, RL (1984). A fluoroscopic study of the position and action of the jointed snaffle bit in the horse's mouth. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 4: 193–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Clayton, HM (1985). A fluoroscopic study of the position and action of different bits in the horse's mouth. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 5: 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Manfredi, J, Clayton, HM and Rosenstein, D (2005). Radiographic study of bit position within the horse's oral cavity. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology 2: 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Knox-Thompson, E and Dickens, S (1990). Pony Club Manual No. 2. Auckland, NZ: Ray Richards.Google Scholar
9 Clayton, HM, Singleton, WH, Lanovaz, JL and Cloud, GL (2003). Measurement of rein tension during horseback riding using strain gage transducers. Experimental Techniques 27: 34–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Huynh, H and Mandeville, GK (1979). Validity conditions in repeated measures designs. Psychological Bulletin 86: 964–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Kapitzke, G (2004). The Bit and the Reins. Munich: Trafalgar Square Publishing.Google Scholar
12 Manfredi, J, Clayton, HM and Derksen, F (2005). Swallowing frequency in cantering horses: effects of different bits and bridles. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology 2: 241–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Myler, D, Myler, R and Myler, B (2000). A Whole Bit Better. Oswego, OR: Toklat Originals.Google Scholar
14 Clayton, HM, Singleton, WH, Lanovaz, JL and Cloud, GL (2005). Strain gauge measurement of rein tension during riding: a pilot study. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology 2: 203–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Preuschoft, H, Witte, H, Recknagel, S, Bar, H, Lesch, C and Wuthrich, M (1999). The effects of various head-gears on horses. Deutsche tierarztliche Wochenschrift 106: 169–175.Google ScholarPubMed
16 Singleton, WH (2001). Rein tension during horse-back riding activities. MS Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
17 Engelke, E and Gasse, H (2003). An anatomical study of the rostral part of the equine oral cavity with respect to position and size of a snaffle bit. Equine Veterinary Education 15: 200–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Dyce, KM, Sack, WO and Wensing, CJG (2002). Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy. 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company.Google Scholar
19 van Lancker, S, van den Broek, W and Simoens, P (2007). Incidence and morphology of bone irregularities of the equine interdental spaces (bars of the mouth). Equine Veterinary Education 19: 103–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Anthony, D and Brown, D (1991). The origins of horseback riding. Antiquity 65: 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar