Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:19:36.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of rein tension of the rider's dominant and non-dominant hand and the influence of the horse's laterality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2010

Sandra Kuhnke ,
Lucy Dumbell ,
Matthias Gauly ,
Jenni L. Johnson ,
Kirsty McDonald  and
Uta König von Borstel
Sandra Kuhnke*
Affiliation:
Hartpury College, Hartpury, GloucestershireGL19 3BE, UK
Lucy Dumbell
Affiliation:
Hartpury College, Hartpury, GloucestershireGL19 3BE, UK
Matthias Gauly
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Goettingen, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, 37075Goettingen, Germany
Jenni L. Johnson
Affiliation:
Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Worcester, WorcesterWR2 6AJ, UK
Kirsty McDonald
Affiliation:
Hartpury College, Hartpury, GloucestershireGL19 3BE, UK
Uta König von Borstel
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Goettingen, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, 37075Goettingen, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of the horse's laterality on the symmetry of rein tension in right-handed riders. Eleven right-handed riders rode both a right-lateralized (RL) and a left-lateralized (LL) horse. Rein tension was measured during three circles of walk, trot and canter and four walk–halt transitions in each direction. Tensions were recorded continuously using a rein tension meter. The LL horse was ridden with significantly stronger mean tension in the left rein than in the right rein (1.5 vs. 1.4 kg; P = 0.0352). Significantly more tension was applied to the outside rein in a clockwise (1.4 vs. 1.2 kg; P = 0.0202), but not in a counterclockwise, direction (1.3 vs. 1.2 kg; P = 0.49). Less minimum tension (0.06 vs. 0.29 kg) and greater maximum (6.4 vs. 3.9 kg) and range of tension (6.3 vs. 3.6 kg) occurred in the left rein of the RL horse (P < 0.0001) and the right rein of the LL horse (0.37 vs. 0.08 kg, 4.8 vs. 7.4 kg, 4.3 vs. 7.3 kg respectively; P < 0.0001). The results of the present study indicate that the different utilization of both reins is likely to be influenced by the laterality of both horse and rider. These findings may have important implications for equine training, since consistency of reinforcement is an important factor for equine learning success.

Keywords

horseridingrein tensionlateralityhorse–rider interactionlearning theory
Type
Research Paper
Information
Comparative Exercise Physiology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 57 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Hammond, G (2002). Correlates of human handedness in primary motor cortex: a review and hypothesis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 26: 285–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Volkmann, J, Schnitzler, A, Witte, OW and Freund, H-J (1998) Handedness and asymmetry of hand representation in human motor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 79: 2149–2154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Friedli, WG, Fuhr, P and Wiget, W (1987). Detection threshold for percutaneous electrical stimuli: asymmetry with respect to handedness. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 50: 870–876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Sathiamoorthy, A and Sathiamoorthy, SS (1990). Limb dominance and motor conduction velocity of median and ulnar nerves. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 34: 51–53.Google ScholarPubMed
5Fugl-Meyer, AR, Eriksson, A, Sjostrom, M and Soderstrom, G (1982). Is muscle structure influenced by genetical or functional factors? A study of three forearm muscles. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 114: 277–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Adam, A, De Luca, CJ and Erim, Z (1998). Hand dominance and motor unit firing behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology 80: 1373–1382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Diederichsen, LP, Nørregaard, J, Dyhre-Poulsen, P, Winther, A, Tufekovic, G, Bandholm, T, et al. (2007). The effect of handedness on electromyographic activity of human shoulder muscles during movement. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 17: 410–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Bagesteiro, LB and Sainburg, RL (2002). Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. Journal of Neurophysiology 88: 2408–2421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Farina, D and Merletti, R (2003). A novel approach for estimating muscle fiber conduction velocity by spatial and temporal filtering of surface EMG signals. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 50(12): 1340–1351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Mathiassen, SE, Winkel, J and Hägg, GM (1995). Normalisation of surface EMG from the upper trapezius muscle in ergonomic studies – a review. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 4: 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Steele, J (2000). Handedness in past human populations: skeletal markers. Laterality 5(3): 193–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Weber, EH, Ross, HE and Murray, DJ (1978). E.H. Weber on the Tactile Senses. Ross, HE, Murray, DJ (eds and translators), 2nd edn; Erlbaum (UK) Taylor and Francis on behalf of The Experimental Psychology Society, London.Google Scholar
13Flanagan, J (1996). Action-perception coupling in judgments of hand-held loads. In: Wing AM, and Flanagan, HP Jr (eds) Hand and Brain: Neurophysiology and Psychology of Hand Movement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 415–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Flanagan, JR and Wing, AM (1997). Effects of surface texture and grip force on the discrimination of hand-held loads. Perception and Psychophysics 59: 111–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15McGreevy, P and Rogers, LJ (2005). Motor and sensory laterality in thoroughbred horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92: 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16McGreevy, PD and Thomson, PC (2006). Differences in motor laterality between breeds of performance horse. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 99(1–2): 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Murphy, J and Arkins, S (2008). Facial hair whorls (trichoglyphs) and the incidence of motor laterality in the horse. Behavioural Processes 79: 7–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Austin, NP and Rogers, LJ (2007). Asymmetry of flight and escape turning responses in horses. Laterality 12(5): 464–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Larose, C, Rogers, LJ, Richard-Yris, M-A and Hausberger, M (2006). Laterality of horses associated with emotionality in novel situations. Laterality 11: 355–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20De Boyer Des Roches, A, Richard-Yris, MA, Henry, S, Ezzaouïa, M and Hausberger, M (2008). Laterality and emotions: visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) differs with objects' emotional value. Physiology & Behavior 94: 487–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Van Heel, MCV, Kroekenstoel, AM, Van Dierendonck, MC, Van Weeren, PR and Back, W (2006). Uneven feet in a foal may develop as a consequence of lateral grazing behaviour induced by conformational traits. Equine Veterinary Journal 38(7): 646–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Murphy, J, Sutherland, A and Arkins, S (2005). Idiosyncratic motor laterality in the horse. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 91: 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Williams, DE and Norris, BJ (2007). Laterality in stride pattern preferences in racehorses. Animal Behaviour 74: 941–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Klimke, R (1985). Basic Training of the Young Horse. London: J.A. Allen.Google Scholar
25Miesner, S, Putz, M and Plewa, M (2000). Richtlinien für Reiten und Fahren, Band 1, Grundausbildung für Reiter und Pferd [Guidelines for riding and driving. Vol. 1, Basic training for horse and rider]. 27th edn. Warendorf, Germany: FN Verlag, pp. 70–113.Google Scholar
26Clayton, HM (1990). Kinematics of equine jumping. Equine Athlete 3: 17–20.Google Scholar
27Powers, PNR and Harrison, AJ (2000). How can the rider help show jumpers to have better performances. In: Lindner, A (ed.) The Elite Show Jumper. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Pers, pp. 79–90.Google Scholar
28Hinnemann, J and van Baalen, C (2004). The Simplicity of Dressage. London: J.A. Allen, pp. 88–92.Google Scholar
29Dyson, S, Murray, R, Branch, M and Harding, E (2003). The sacroiliac joints: evaluation using nuclear scintigraphy. Part 2: lame horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 35: 233–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Stashak, TS (1995). Horseowner's Guide to Lameness. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
31Davies, HMS (1996). The effects of different exercise conditions on metacarpal bone strains in thoroughbred racehorses. Pferdeheilkunde 12(4): 666–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Deuel, NR and Lawrence, LM (1987). Laterality in the gallop gait of horses. Journal of Biomechanics 20: 645–649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Peloso, JG, Mundy, GD and Cohen, ND (1996). Prevalence of, and factors associated with, musculoskeletal racing injuries of thoroughbreds. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 204(4): 620–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Pugh, TJ and Bolin, D (2004). Overuse injuries in equestrian athletes. Current Sports Medicine Reports 3: 297–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Terada, K, Clayton, HM and Kato, K (2006). Stabilization of wrist position during horseback riding at trot. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology 3(4): 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Podhajsky, A (1967). The Complete Training of Horse and Rider. London: The Sportsman's Press.Google Scholar
37Clayton, HM, Singleton, WH, Lanovaz, JL and Cloud, GL (2003). Measurement of rein tension during horseback riding using strain gage transducers. Experimental Techniques 27: 34–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Clayton, HM, Singleton, WH, Lanovaz, JL and Cloud, GL (2005). Strain gauge measurement of rein tension during riding: a pilot study. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology 2: 203–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Preuschoft, H, Witte, H, Recknagel, S, Bar, H, Lesch, C and Wuthrich, M (1999). The effects of various head-gears on horses. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 106: 169–175.Google ScholarPubMed
40Warren-Smith, AK, Curtis, RA and McGreevy, PD (2005). A low cost device for measuring the tensions exerted on domestic horses by riders and handlers. In: McGreevy, PD, McLean, AN, Warren-Smith, AK, Goodwin, D and Waran, N (eds) Proceedings of the First International Equitation Science Symposium, 26–27 August, Melbourne, Australia. Melbourne: Australian Equine Behaviour Centre, pp. 44–55.Google Scholar
41Warren-Smith, AK, Curtis, RA, Greetham, L and McGreevy, PD (2007). Rein contact between horse and handler during specific equitation movements. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 108: 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42Westerhausen, R, Walter, C, Kreuder, F, Wittling, RA, Schweiger, E and Wittling, W (2003). The influence of handedness and gender on the microstructure of the human corpus callosum: a diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience Letters 351: 99–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Curt, F, Mesbah, M, Lellouch, J and Dellatolas, G (1997). Handedness scale: how many and which items? Laterality 2(2): 137–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44McManus, IC, Porac, C, Bryden, MP and Boucher, R (1999). Eye-dominance, writing hand, and throwing hand. Laterality 4(2): 173–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Deutsche Reiterliche Vereinigung FN, (ed.) (2008). Leistungsprüfungsordnung LPO. Warendorf, Germany: FN Verlag.Google Scholar
46Müseler, W (1983). Riding Logic. Millwood, NY: Arco Publishing, pp. 34–48.Google Scholar
47McGreevy, PD (2007). The advent of equitation science. The Veterinary Journal 174: 492–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Roepstorff, L, Egenvall, A, Rhodin, M, Byström, A, Johnston, C, Van Weeren, PR, et al. (2009). Kinetics and kinematics of the horse comparing left and right rising trot. Equine Veterinary Journal 41(3): 292–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49Symes, D and Ellis, R (2009). A preliminary study into rider asymmetry within equitation. The Veterinary Journal 181: 34–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50De Cocq, P, Prinsen, H, Springer, NCN, Van Weeren, PR, Schreuder, M, Muller, M, et al. (2009). The effect of rising and sitting trot on back movements and head–neck position of the horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 41(5): 423–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51McLean, AN (2003). The Truth about Horses. Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
52McGreevy, P (2004). Equine Behavior: A Guide for Veterin-arians and Equine Scientists. Edinburgh, UK: W.B. Saunders.Google Scholar
53Murphy, J and Arkins, S (2007). Equine learning behaviour. Behavioural Processes 76: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed