Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:21:28.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Runge-Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin Method with a Simple and Compact Hermite WENO Limiter

Part of: Hyperbolic equations and systems Partial differential equations, initial value and time-dependent initial-boundary value problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Jun Zhu ,
Xinghui Zhong ,
Chi-Wang Shu  and
Jianxian Qiu
Jun Zhu
Affiliation:
College of Science, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, P.R. China
Xinghui Zhong
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
Chi-Wang Shu
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI02912, USA
Jianxian Qiu*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences and Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Mathematical Modeling and High-Performance Scientific Computation, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, P.R. China
*
*Corresponding author.Email addresses:[email protected] (J. Zhu), [email protected] (X. Zhong), [email protected] (C.-W. Shu), [email protected] (J. Qiu)
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new type of weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) limiter, which belongs to the class of Hermite WENO (HWENO) limiters, for the Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin (RKDG) methods solving hyperbolic conservation laws. This new HWENO limiter is a modification of the simple WENO limiter proposed recently by Zhong and Shu [29]. Both limiters use information of the DG solutions only from the target cell and its immediate neighboring cells, thus maintaining the original compactness of the DG scheme. The goal of both limiters is to obtain high order accuracy and non-oscillatory properties simultaneously. The main novelty of the new HWENO limiter in this paper is to reconstruct the polynomial on the target cell in a least square fashion [8] while the simple WENO limiter [29] is to use the entire polynomial of the original DG solutions in the neighboring cells with an addition of a constant for conservation. The modification in this paper improves the robustness in the computation of problems with strong shocks or contact discontinuities, without changing the compact stencil of the DG scheme. Numerical results for both one and two dimensional equations including Euler equations of compressible gas dynamics are provided to illustrate the viability of this modified limiter.

Keywords

Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methodHWENO limiterconservation law

MSC classification

Secondary: 65M60: Finite elements, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods, finite methods 35L65: Conservation laws
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , April 2016 , pp. 944 - 969
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Balsara, D. S. and Shu, C.-W., Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy, Journal of Computational Physics, 160 (2000), 405–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Biswas, R., Devine, K.D. and Flaherty, J., Parallel, adaptive finite element methods for conservation laws, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 14 (1994), 255–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Burbeau, A., Sagaut, P. and Bruneau, C.H., A problem-independent limiter for high-order Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods, Journal of Computational Physics, 169 (2001), 111–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Cockburn, B., Hou, S. and Shu, C.-W., The Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws IV: the multidimensional case, Mathematics of Computation, 54 (1990), 545–581.Google Scholar
[5]Cockburn, B., Lin, S.-Y. and Shu, C.-W., TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws III: one dimensional systems, Journal of Computational Physics, 84 (1989), 90–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Cockburn, B. and Shu, C.-W., TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws II: general framework, Mathematics of Computation, 52 (1989), 411–435.Google Scholar
[7]Cockburn, B. and Shu, C.-W., The Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for conservation laws V: multidimensional systems, Journal of Computational Physics, 141 (1998), 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Dumbser, M., Balsara, D.S., Toro, E.F. and Munz, C.D., A unified framework for the construction of one-step finite-volume and discontinuous Galerkin schemes on unstructured meshes, Journal of Computational Physics, 227 (2008), 8209–8253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Dumbser, M. and Käser, M., Arbitrary high order non-oscillatory finite volume schemes on unstructured meshes for linear hyperbolic systems, Journal of Computational Physics, 221 (2007), 693–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Dumbser, M., Zanotti, O., Loubère, R. and Diot, S., A posteriori subcell limiting of the discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Computational Physics, 278 (2014), 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Friedrichs, O., Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for the interpolation of mean values on unstructured grids, Journal of Computational Physics, 144 (1998), 194–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Hu, C. and Shu, C.-W., Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes on triangular meshes, Journal of Computational Physics, 150 (1999), 97–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Jiang, G. and Shu, C.-W., Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 126 (1996), 202–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Korobeinikov, V.P., Problems of Point-Blast Theory, American Institute of Physics, 1991.Google Scholar
[15]Krivodonova, L., Xin, J., Remacle, J.-F., Chevaugeon, N. and Flaherty, J.E., Shock detection and limiting with discontinuous Galerkin methods for hyperbolic conservation laws, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 48 (2004), 323–338.Google Scholar
[16]Linde, T., Roe, P.L., Robust Euler codes, in: 13th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA Paper-97-2098.Google Scholar
[17]Liu, X., Osher, S. and Chan, T., Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 115 (1994), 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Luo, H., Baum, J.D. and Lohner, R., A Hermite WENO-based limiter for discontinuous Galerkin method on unstructured grids, Journal of Computational Physics, 225 (2007), 686–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Qiu, J. and Shu, C.-W., Hermite WENO schemes and their application as limitersfor Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method: one dimensional case, Journal of Computational Physics, 193 (2003), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Qiu, J. and Shu, C.-W., Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method using WENO limiters, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 26 (2005), 907–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Qiu, J. and Shu, C.-W., A comparison of troubled-cell indicators for Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods using weighted essentially nonoscillatory limiters, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 27 (2005), 995–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Qiu, J. and Shu, C.-W., Hermite WENO schemes and their application as limitersfor Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method II: two dimensional case, Computers and Fluids, 34 (2005), 642–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Sedov, L.I., Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics, Academic Press, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
[24]Shu, C.-W., Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, In Advanced Numerical Approximation of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations, Cockburn, B., Johnson, C., Shu, C.-W. and Tadmor, E. (Editor: Quarteroni, A.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, volume 1697, Springer, 1998, 325–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Shu, C.-W. and Osher, S., Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 77 (1988), 439–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Shu, C.-W. and Osher, S., Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes II, Journal of Computational Physics, 83 (1989), 32–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Wang, C., Zhang, X., Shu, C.-W. and Ning, J., Robust high order discontinuous Galerkin schemes for two-dimensional gaseous detonations, Journal of Computational Physics, 231 (2012), 653–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28]Woodward, P. and Colella, P., The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks, Journal of Computational Physics, 54 (1984), 115–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29]Zhong, X. and Shu, C.-W., A simple weighted essentially nonoscillatory limiter for Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods, Journal of Computational Physics, 232 (2013), 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30]Zhu, J., Qiu, J., Shu, C.-W. and Dumbser, M., Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method using WENO limiters II: Unstructured meshes, Journal of Computational Physics, 227 (2008), 4330–4353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31]Zhu, J., Zhong, X., Shu, C.-W. and Qiu, J.X., Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method using a new type of WENO limiters on unstructured meshes, Journal of Computational Physics, 248 (2013), 200–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar