Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:45:14.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Runge-Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin Method with a Simple and Compact Hermite WENO Limiter on Unstructured Meshes

Part of: Partial differential equations, initial value and time-dependent initial-boundary value problems Hyperbolic equations and systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2017

Jun Zhu ,
Xinghui Zhong ,
Chi-Wang Shu  and
Jianxian Qiu
Jun Zhu*
Affiliation:
College of Science, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, P.R. China
Xinghui Zhong*
Affiliation:
Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
Chi-Wang Shu*
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
Jianxian Qiu*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences and Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Mathematical Modeling and High-Performance Scientific Computation, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, P.R. China
*
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:[email protected] (J. Zhu), [email protected] (X. Zhong), [email protected] (C.-W. Shu), [email protected] (J. Qiu)
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:[email protected] (J. Zhu), [email protected] (X. Zhong), [email protected] (C.-W. Shu), [email protected] (J. Qiu)
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:[email protected] (J. Zhu), [email protected] (X. Zhong), [email protected] (C.-W. Shu), [email protected] (J. Qiu)
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:[email protected] (J. Zhu), [email protected] (X. Zhong), [email protected] (C.-W. Shu), [email protected] (J. Qiu)
Get access

Abstract

In this paper we generalize a new type of compact Hermite weighted essentially non-oscillatory (HWENO) limiter for the Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin (RKDG) method, which was recently developed in [38] for structured meshes, to two dimensional unstructured meshes. The main idea of this HWENO limiter is to reconstruct the new polynomial by the usage of the entire polynomials of the DG solution from the target cell and its neighboring cells in a least squares fashion [11] while maintaining the conservative property, then use the classical WENO methodology to form a convex combination of these reconstructed polynomials based on the smoothness indicators and associated nonlinear weights. The main advantage of this new HWENO limiter is the robustness for very strong shocks and simplicity in implementation especially for the unstructured meshes considered in this paper, since only information from the target cell and its immediate neighbors is needed. Numerical results for both scalar and system equations are provided to test and verify the good performance of this new limiter.

Keywords

Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methodHWENO limiterunstructured mesh

MSC classification

Secondary: 65M60: Finite elements, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods, finite methods 35L65: Conservation laws
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , March 2017 , pp. 623 - 649
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Balsara, D.S. and Shu, C.-W., Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy, Journal of Computational Physics, 160 (2000), 405–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Bassi, F. and Rebay, S., High-order accurate discontinuous finite element solution of the 2D Euler equations, Journal of Computational Physics, 138 (1997), 251–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Biswas, R., Devine, K.D. and Flaherty, J., Parallel, adaptive finite element methods for conservation laws, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 14 (1994), 255–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Burbeau, A., Sagaut, P. and Bruneau, C.H., A problem-independent limiter for high-order Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods, Journal of Computational Physics, 169 (2001), 111–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Cockburn, B., Discontinuous Galerkin methods for convection-dominated problems, in Barth, T. and Deconinck, H., editors, High-Order Methods for Computational Physics, Volume 9 of Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Springer, Berlin, 1999, 69–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Cockburn, B., Hou, S. and Shu, C.-W., The Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws IV: the multidimensional case, Mathematics of Computation, 54 (1990), 545–581.Google Scholar
[7] Cockburn, B., Lin, S.-Y. and Shu, C.-W., TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws III: one dimensional systems, Journal of Computational Physics, 84 (1989), 90–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Cockburn, B. and Shu, C.-W., TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws II: general framework, Mathematics of Computation, 52 (1989), 411–435.Google Scholar
[9] Cockburn, B. and Shu, C.-W., The Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for conservation laws V: multidimensional systems, Journal of Computational Physics, 141 (1998), 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Cockburn, B. and Shu, C.-W., Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for convection-dominated problems, Journal of Scientific Computing, 16 (2001), 173–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Dumbser, M., Balsara, D.S., Toro, E.F. and Munz, C.D., A unified framework for the construction of one-step finite-volume and discontinuous Galerkin schemes on unstructured meshes, Journal of Computational Physics, 227 (2008), 8209–8253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Dumbser, M. and Käser, M., Arbitrary high order non-oscillatory finite volume schemes on unstructured meshes for linear hyperbolic systems, Journal of Computational Physics, 221 (2007), 693–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Dumbser, M., Zanotti, O., Loubère, R. and Diot, S., A posteriori subcell limiting of the discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Computational Physics, 278 (2014), 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Friedrichs, O., Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for the interpolation of mean values on unstructured grids, Journal of Computational Physics, 144 (1998), 194–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Hesthaven, J. and Warburton, T., Nodal Discontinuous Galerkin Methods, Springer, New York, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Hu, C. and Shu, C.-W., Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes on triangular meshes, Journal of Computational Physics, 150 (1999), 97–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Jiang, G. and Shu, C.-W., Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 126 (1996), 202–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Korobeinikov, V.P., Problems of Point-Blast Theory, American Institute of Physics, 1991.Google Scholar
[19] Krivodonova, L. and Berger, M., High-order implementation of solid wall boundary conditions in curved geometries, Journal of Computational Physics, 211 (2006), 492–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Krivodonova, L., Xin, J., Remacle, J.-F., Chevaugeon, N. and Flaherty, J.E., Shock detection and limiting with discontinuous Galerkin methods for hyperbolic conservation laws, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 48 (2004), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Li, B., Discontinuous Finite Elements in Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer, Birkhauser, Basel, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] Linde, T. and Roe, P.L., Robust Euler codes, in: 13th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA Paper-97-2098.Google Scholar
[23] Liu, X., Osher, S. and Chan, T., Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 115 (1994), 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24] Luo, H., Baum, J.D. and Lohner, R., A Hermite WENO-based limiter for discontinuous Galerkin method on unstructured grids, Journal of Computational Physics, 225 (2007), 686–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25] Luo, H., Baum, J.D. and Lohner, R., On the computation of steady-state compressible flows using a discontinuous Galerkin method, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 73 (2008), 597–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26] Qiu, J. and Shu, C.-W., Hermite WENO schemes and their application as limiters for Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method: one dimensional case, Journal of Computational Physics, 193 (2003), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27] Qiu, J. and Shu, C.-W., Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method using WENO limiters, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 26 (2005), 907–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28] Qiu, J. and Shu, C.-W., A comparison of troubled-cell indicators for Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods using weighted essentially nonoscillatory limiters, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 27 (2005), 995–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29] Qiu, J. and Shu, C.-W., Hermite WENO schemes and their application as limiters for Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method II: two dimensional case, Computers and Fluids, 34 (2005), 642–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30] Sedov, L.I., Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics, Academic Press, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
[31] Shu, C.-W., Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, In Advanced Numerical Approximation of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations, Cockburn, B., Johnson, C., Shu, C.-W. and Tadmor, E. (Editor: Quarteroni, A.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, volume 1697, Springer, 1998, 325–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32] Shu, C.-W., Discontinuous Galerkin methods: general approach and stability, in Numerical Solutions of Partial Differential Equations, Bertoluzza, S., Falletta, S., Russo, G. and Shu, C.-W., Advanced Courses in Mathematics CRM Barcelona, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2009, 149–201.Google Scholar
[33] Shu, C.-W. and Osher, S., Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 77 (1988), 439–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[34] Woodward, P. and Colella, P., The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks, Journal of Computational Physics, 54 (1984), 115–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[35] Zhong, X. and Shu, C.-W., A simple weighted essentially nonoscillatory limiter for Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods, Journal of Computational Physics, 232 (2013), 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[36] Zhu, J., Qiu, J., Shu, C.-W. and Dumbser, M., Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method using WENO limiters II: Unstructured meshes, Journal of Computational Physics, 227 (2008), 4330–4353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[37] Zhu, J., Zhong, X., Shu, C.-W. and Qiu, J., Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method using a new type of WENO limiters on unstructured meshes, Journal of Computational Physics, 248 (2013), 200–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[38] Zhu, J., Zhong, X., Shu, C.-W. and Qiu, J.: Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method with a simple and compact Hermite WENO limiter, Communications in Computational Physics, 19 (2016), 944–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar