Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:07:13.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical Simulation of Compressible Vortical Flows Using a Conservative Unstructured-Grid Adaptive Scheme†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2015

Giuseppe Forestieri ,
Alberto Guardone ,
Dario Isola ,
Filippo Marulli  and
Giuseppe Quaranta
Giuseppe Forestieri
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa, 34, 20156 Milano, Italy
Alberto Guardone*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa, 34, 20156 Milano, Italy
Dario Isola
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa, 34, 20156 Milano, Italy
Filippo Marulli
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa, 34, 20156 Milano, Italy
Giuseppe Quaranta
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa, 34, 20156 Milano, Italy
*
Corresponding author.Email:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A two-dimensional numerical scheme for the compressible Euler equations is presented and applied here to the simulation of exemplary compressible vortical flows. The proposed approach allows to perform computations on unstructured moving grids with adaptation, which is required to capture complex features of the flow-field. Grid adaptation is driven by suitable error indicators based on the Mach number and by element-quality constraints as well. At the new time level, the computational grid is obtained by a suitable combination of grid smoothing, edge-swapping, grid refinement and de-refinement. The grid modifications—including topology modification due to edge-swapping or the insertion/deletion of a new grid node—are interpreted at the flow solver level as continuous (in time) deformations of suitably-defined node-centered finite volumes. The solution over the new grid is obtained without explicitly resorting to interpolation techniques, since the definition of suitable interface velocities allows one to determine the new solution by simple integration of the Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian formulation of the flow equations. Numerical simulations of the steady oblique-shock problem, of the steady transonic flow and of the start-up unsteady flow around the NACA 0012 airfoil are presented to assess the scheme capabilities to describe these flows accurately.

Keywords

52B1065D18Moving grid methodconservative interpolation
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 866 - 884
Copyright
Copyright © Global Science Press Limited 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Presented at the 2nd European Seminar on Coupled Problems June 28–July 2, 2010, Pilsen, Czech Republic.

References

[1]Baker, T. J.. Mesh adaptation strategies for problems in fluid dynamics. Finite Elements Analysis and Design, 25:243–273, 1997.Google Scholar
[2]Castro-Diaz, M. J., Hect, F., Mohammad, B., and Pironneau, O.. Anisotropic unstructured mesh adaptation for flow simulations. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids., 25:475–491, 1997.Google Scholar
[3]Donea, J.. An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element method for transient fluid– structure interactions. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng., 33:689–723, 1982.Google Scholar
[4]Donea, J., Huerta, A., –Ph, J.. Ponthot, and Rodríguez–Ferran, A.. Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian methods. In Stein, R., E. de Borst, and Hughes, T.J.R., editors, The Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, volume 1, chapter 14, pages 413–437. Wiley, 2004.Google Scholar
[5]Godlewski, E. and Raviart, P. A.. Numerical Approximation of Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
[6]Warren, G. P., Anderson, W. K., Thomas, J. T., and Krist, S. L.. Grid convergence for adaptive methods. In AIAA 10th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 1991. AIAA Paper 91–1592.Google Scholar
[7]Habashi, H. G., Dompierre, J., Bourgault, Y., Ait-Ali-Yahia, D., Fortin, M., and Vallet, M. G.. Anisotropic mesh adaptation: towards user-indipendent, mesh indipendent and solver-indipendent CFD. Part I: General principles. Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 32(6):725–744, 2000.Google Scholar
[8]Isola, D., Guardone, A., and Quaranta, G.. Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian formulation for grids with variable topology. In Onñ, E.;ate Papadrakakis, M.Schrefler, B., editor, Proceedings of the III Int. Conf. on Computational Methods for Coupled Problems in Science and Engineering ECCOMAS COUPLED PROBLEMS 2009. CIMNE, Barcelona, 2009.Google Scholar
[9]Isola, D., Guardone, A., and Quaranta, G.. An ALE scheme without interpolation for moving domain with adaptive grids. In 40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, 2010.Google Scholar
[10]LeVeque, R. J.. Finite Volume Methods for Conservation Laws and Hyperbolic Systems. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
[11]Lohner, R.. Mesh adaptation in fluid mechanics. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 50:819– 847, 1995.Google Scholar
[12]Gessow, A. and Meyer, G. C.. Aerodynamics of the helicopter. Frederick Ungar Publishing, 1952.Google Scholar
[13]Peraire, J., Vadhati, M., Morgan, K., and Zienkiewicz, O. C.. Adaptive remeshing for compressible flow computations. J.Comput. Phys., 72:449–466, 1987.Google Scholar
[14]Pirzadeh, S.. Unstructured viscous grid genereration by the advancing layers method. AIAA J., 32(8):1735–1737, 1994.Google Scholar
[15]Quaranta, G., Isola, D., and Guardone, A.. Numerical simulation of the opening of aerodynamic control surfaces with two-dimensional unstructured adaptive meshes. In 5th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics - ECCOMAS CFD 2010, 2010.Google Scholar
[16]Roe, P. L.. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys., 43:357–372, 1981.Google Scholar
[17]Selmin, V.. The node-centred finite volume approach: bridge between finite differences and finite elements. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng., 102:107–138, 1993.Google Scholar
[18]Spalart, P. R.. Airplane trailing vortices. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 30:107–138, 1998.Google Scholar
[19]Sweby, P. K.. High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 21:985–1011, 1984.Google Scholar
[20]Thompson, J. F.. Numerical Grid Generation: Foundations and Applications. Elsevier Science Publishing, 1985.Google Scholar
[21]van Leer, B.. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme II. Monotoniticy and conservation combined in a second order scheme. J. Comput. Phys., 14:361–370, 1974.Google Scholar
[22]Venkatakrishnan, V. and Mavriplis, D. J.. Implicit method for the computation of unsteady flows on unstructured grids. J. Comput. Phys., 127:380–397, 1996.Google Scholar
[23]Fossati, M., Guardone, A., and Vigevano, L.. A node-pair finite element/finite volume mesh adaptation technique for compressible flows. In 40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, 2010.Google Scholar
[24]Weatherill, N. P., Hassan, O., Marchant, M., and Marcum, D.. Adaptive inviscid solutions for aerospace geometries on efficiently generated unstructured tetrahedral meshes. AIAA Paper 93–3390, 1993.Google Scholar
[25]Webster, B. E., Shepard, M. S., Rhusak, Z., and Flaherty, J. E.. Automated adaptive time discontinuous finite element method for unsteady compressible airfoil. AIAA J., 32:748–757, 1994.Google Scholar
[26]Xia, G., Li, D., and Merkle, C. L.. Anisotropic grid adaptation on unstructured meshes. In 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2001. AIAA Paper 2001–0443.Google Scholar