Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:12:16.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Contact SPH Method with High-Order Limiters for Simulation of Inviscid Compressible Flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2015

Xueying Zhang*
Affiliation:
College of Science, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, P.R. China
Haiyan Tian*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA
Leihsin Kuo*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA
Wen Chen*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Mechanics, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, P.R. China
*
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, we study a class of contact smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) by introducing Riemann solvers and using high-order limiters. In particular, a promising concept of WENO interpolation as limiter is presented in the reconstruction process. The physical values relating interactional particles used as the initial values of the Riemann problem can be reconstructed by the Taylor series expansion. The contact solvers of the Riemann problem at contact points are incorporated in SPH approximations. In order to keep the fluid density at the wall rows to be consistent with that of the inner fluid wall boundaries, several lines of dummy particles are placed outside of the solid walls, which are assigned according to the initial configuration. At last, the method is applied to compressible flows with sharp discontinuities such as the collision of two strong shocks and the interaction of two blast waves and so on. The numerical results indicate that the method is capable of handling sharp discontinuity and efficiently reducing unphysical oscillations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Global Science Press Limited 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Wiezckowski, Z., The material point method in large strain engineering problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 193 (2004), 44174438.Google Scholar
[2]Liu, W. K., Jun, S., Li, S.et al., Reproducing kernel particle methods for structural dynamics. Int. Numer. Methods Eng., 38 (1995), 16551679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Monaghan, J. J., On the problem of penetration in particle methods, J. Comput. Phys., 82 (1989), 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Shu, C., Ding, H., Chen, H. Q., Wang, T. G., An upwind local RBF-DQ method for simulation of inviscid compressible flows, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 194 (2005), 20012017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Chen, C. S., Lee, S., Huang, C. S., The method of particular solutions using Chebyshev polynomial based function, International Journal of Computational Methods, 4 (2007), 1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Campbell, J., Vignjevic, R., Libersky, L., A contact algorithm for smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 184 (2000), 4965.Google Scholar
[7]Monaghan, J. J., Simulating free surfaceflows with SPH, J. Comput. Phys., 110 (1994),399406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Monaghan, J. J., SPH and Riemann solvers, J. Comput. Phys., 136 (1997), 298307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Inutsuka, S., Reformulation of smoothed particle hydrodynamics with Riemann solver, J. Comput. Phys., 179 (2002), 238267.Google Scholar
[10]Parshikov, A. N., Medin, S. A., Loukashenko, I. I.et al., Improvements in SPH method by means of interparticle contact algorithm and analysis of perforation tests at moderate projectile velocities, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 24 (2000), 779796.Google Scholar
[11]Parshikov, A. N., Medin, S. A., Smoothed particle hydrodynamics using interparticle contact algorithms, J. Comput. Phys., 180 (2002), 358382.Google Scholar
[12]Cha, S. H., Whitworth, A. P., Implementation and tests of Godunov-type particle hydrodynamics, Mon. Not. Royal Astron. Soc., 340 (2003), 7390.Google Scholar
[13]Ferrari, A., Dumbser, M., Toro, E. F., Armanini, A., A new stable and consistent version of the SPH method in Lagrangian coordinates, SPHERIC-Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics European Research Interest Community, 2nd International Workshop, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, 2318 May, 2007.Google Scholar
[14]Sigalotti, L. D., Loópez, H., Donoso, A., A shock-capturing SPH scheme based on adaptive kernel estimation, J. Comput. Phys., 212 (2006), 124149.Google Scholar
[15]Sigalotti, L. D., Loãpez, H., Trujillo, L., An adaptive SPH method for strong shocks, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (2009), 58885907.Google Scholar
[16]Morris, J. P., Fox, P. J., Zhu, Y., Modeling low Reynolds number incompressible flows using SPH, J. Comput. Phys., 136 (1997), 214226.Google Scholar
[17]Monaghan, J. J., Smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 30 (1992), 543574.Google Scholar
[18]Colagrossi, A., Landrini, M., Numerical simulation of interfacial flows by smoothed particle hydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys., 191 (2003), 448475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Dalrymple, R. A., Rogers, B. D., Numerical modeling of water waves with the SPH method, Coast. Eng., 53 (2006), 141147.Google Scholar
[20]Shu, C. W., Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, in: Cockburn, B., Johnson, C., Shu, C. W., Tadmor, E., Quarteroni, A. (Eds.), Advanced Numerical Approximation of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1697, Springer, New York, 1998, 325432.Google Scholar
[21]Toro, E. F., Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Introduction, Third Edition, Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
[22]Liu, G. R., Liu, M. B., Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: A Meshfree Particle Method, World Scientific, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar