Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T19:29:14.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acoustic Scattering Cross Sections of Smart Obstacles: A Case Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2015

Lorella Fatone ,
Maria Cristina Recchioni  and
Francesco Zirilli
Lorella Fatone*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Universitàdi Camerino, Via Madonna delle Carceri 9, 62032 Camerino (MC), Italy
Maria Cristina Recchioni*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Sociali “D. Serrani”, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Piazza Martelli 8, 60121 Ancona, Italy
Francesco Zirilli*
Affiliation:
CERI-Centro di Ricerca “Previsione Prevenzione e Controllo dei Rischi Geologici”, Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, Piazza Umberto Pilozzi 9, 00038 Valmontone (RM), Italy
*
Email:[email protected]
Email:[email protected]
Corresponding author.Email:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Acoustic scattering cross sections of smart furtive obstacles are studied and discussed. A smart furtive obstacle is an obstacle that, when hit by an incoming field, avoids detection through the use of a pressure current acting on its boundary. A highly parallelizable algorithm for computing the acoustic scattering cross section of smart obstacles is developed. As a case study, this algorithm is applied to the (acoustic) scattering cross section of a “smart” (furtive) simplified version of the NASA space shuttle when hit by incoming time-harmonic plane waves, the wavelengths of which are small compared to the characteristic dimensions of the shuttle. The solution to this numerically challenging scattering problem requires the solution of systems of linear equations with many unknowns and equations. Due to the sparsity of these systems of equations, they can be stored and solved using affordable computing resources. A cross section analysis of the simplified NASA space shuttle highlights three findings: i) the smart furtive obstacle reduces the magnitude of its cross section compared to the cross section of a corresponding “passive” obstacle; ii) several wave propagation directions fail to satisfactorily respond to the smart strategy of the obstacle; iii) satisfactory furtive effects along all directions may only be obtained by using a pressure current of considerable magnitude. Numerical experiments and virtual reality applications can be found at the website: http://www.ceri.uniromal.it/ceri/zirilli/w7.

Keywords

49j2049MxxAcoustic obstacle scatteringsmart obstaclesacoustic cross sectionopen loop controloperator expansion methodwavelet expansion
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 672 - 694
Copyright
Copyright © Global Science Press Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Chambers, B., A smart radar absorber, J. Smart. Mater. Struct., 8 (1999), 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Chambers, B. and Ford, K. L., A smart microwave absorber, IEE Electr. Lett., 36 (2000), 50–52.Google Scholar
[3]Chambers, B. and Tennant, A., General analysis of the phase-switched screen part1: the single layer case, Proceedings IEE part F-Radar Sonar Navigation, 149 (2002), 243–247.Google Scholar
[4]Chambers, B. and Tennant, A., Influence of switching waveform characteristics on the performance of a single layer phase-switched, IEEE T. Electromagn. C., 44 (2002), 434–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Fatone, L., Pacelli, G., Recchioni, M. C. and Zirilli, F., Optimal-control methods to study two new classes of smart obstacles in time-dependent acoustic scattering, J. Eng. Math., 56 (2006), 385–413.Google Scholar
[6]Fatone, L., Rao, G., Recchioni, M. C. and Zirilli, F., High performance algorithms based on a new wavelet expansion for time dependent acoustic obstacle scattering, Commun. Comput. Phys., 2 (2007), 1139–1173.Google Scholar
[7]Fatone, L., Recchioni, M. C. and Zirilli, F., A numerical method to solve an acoustic inverse scattering problem involving ghost obstacles, J. Inverse. Ill-Posed. Prob., 15 (2007), 57–82.Google Scholar
[8]Fatone, L., Recchioni, M. C. and Zirilli, F., A method to solve an acoustic inverse scattering problem involving smart obstacles, Waves. Random. Complex., 16 (2006), 433–455.Google Scholar
[9]Fatone, L., Recchioni, M. C. and Zirilli, F., A masking problem in time dependent acoustic obstacle scattering, Acoust. Res. Lett. Onl., 5(2) (2004), 25–30.Google Scholar
[10]Fatone, L., Recchioni, M. C. and Zirilli, F., Furtivity and masking problems in time dependent electromagnetic obstacle scattering, J. Opt. Theory. Appl., 121 (2004), 223–257.Google Scholar
[11]Fatone, L., Recchioni, M. C. and Zirilli, F., A parallel numerical method tosolve high frequency ghost obstacle acoustic scattering problems, J. Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc., 23 (2008), 220–232.Google Scholar
[12]Foster, I., Kesselman, C. and Tuecke, S., The anatomy of the grid, Int. J. Supercomput. Appl., 15(3) (2001), 200–222.Google Scholar
[13]Mariani, F., Recchioni, M. C. and Zirilli, F., The use of the Pontryagin maximum principle in a furtivity problem in time-dependent acoustic obstacle scattering, Waves. Random. Complex., 11 (2001), 549–575.Google Scholar
[14]Migliori, S., Bracco, G., Fatone, L., Recchioni, M. C. and Zirilli, F., A parallel code for time dependent acoustic scattering involving passive or smart obstacles, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl., 25(1) (2011), 70–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Ramm, A. G., Invisible obstacles, Ann. Pol. Math., 90 (2007), 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar