Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:37:54.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Penalty Optimization Algorithm for Eigenmode Optimization Problem Using Sensitivity Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2015

Zhengfang Zhang ,
Weifeng Chen  and
Xiaoliang Cheng
Zhengfang Zhang*
Affiliation:
College of Science, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, P.R. China
Weifeng Chen
Affiliation:
School of Information, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, P.R. China
Xiaoliang Cheng
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, P.R. China
*
Corresponding author.Email:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This paper investigates the eigenmode optimization problem governed by the scalar Helmholtz equation in continuum system in which the computed eigenmode approaches the prescribed eigenmode in the whole domain. The first variation for the eigenmode optimization problem is evaluated by the quadratic penalty method, the adjoint variable method, and the formula based on sensitivity analysis. A penalty optimization algorithm is proposed, in which the density evolution is accomplished by introducing an artificial time term and solving an additional ordinary differential equation. The validity of the presented algorithm is confirmed by numerical results of the first and second eigenmode optimizations in 1D and 2D problems.

Keywords

35Q6049R0565F1565F1890C31Sensitivity analysiseigenmode optimization problemfinite element methodpenalty method
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , March 2014 , pp. 776 - 796
Copyright
Copyright © Global Science Press Limited 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Allaire, G., Aubry, S., and Jouve, F., Eigenfrequency optimization in optimal design, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 190 (2001), pp. 3565–3579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bendsøe, M. P. and Kikuchi, N., Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 71 (1988), pp. 197–224.Google Scholar
[3]Brenner, S., Li, F., and Sung, L., A locally divergence-free interior penalty method for two-dimensional curl-curl problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 46 (2008), pp. 1190–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Burger, M., Hackl, B., and Ring, W., Incorporating topological derivatives into level set methods, J. Comput. Phys., 194 (2004), pp. 344–362.Google Scholar
[5]Cot, L., Raymond, J., and Vancostenoble, J., Exact controllability of an aeroacoustic model with a Neumann and a Dirichlet boundary control, SIAM J. Control. Optim., 48 (2009), pp. 1489–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Cox, S. and McLaughlin, J., Extremal eigenvalue problems for composite membranes, I, Appl. Math. Opt., 22 (1990), pp. 153–167.Google Scholar
[7]Cox, S. and Uhlig, P., Where best to hold a drum fast, SIAM J. Optim., 9 (1999), pp. 948–964.Google Scholar
[8]Díaaz, A. and Kikuchi, N., Solutions to shape and topology eigenvalue optimization problems using a homogenization method, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 35 (1992), pp. 1487–1502.Google Scholar
[9]Du, J. and Olhoff, N., Topological design of freely vibrating continuum structures for maximum values of simple and multiple eigenfrequencies and frequency gaps, Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 34 (2007), pp. 91–110.Google Scholar
[10]Fox, R. L. and Kapoor, M. P., Rates of change of eigenvalues and eigenvectors, AIAA J., 6 (1968), pp. 2426–2429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Giaquinta, M. and Hildebrandt, S., Calculus of Variations I, Springer, Berlin, 2004.Google Scholar
[12]Gottlieb, S. and Shu, C., Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes, Math. Comput., 67 (1998), pp. 73–85.Google Scholar
[13]Gottlieb, S., Shu, C., and Tadmor, E., Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods, SIAM Rev., 43 (2001), pp. 89–112.Google Scholar
[14]Gould, S., Variational Methods for Eigenvalue Problems: An Introduction to the Methods of Rayleigh, Ritz, Weinstein, and Aronszajn, Dover Publications, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
[15]Haber, E., A multilevel, level-set method for optimizing eigenvalues in shape design problems, J. Comput. Phys., 198 (2004), pp. 518–534.Google Scholar
[16]He, W., Bindel, D., and Govindjee, S., Topology optimization in micromechanical resonator design, Optim. Eng., 13 (2012), pp. 271–292.Google Scholar
[17]Inzarulfaisham, A. and Azegami, H., Solution to boundary shape optimization problem of linear elastic continua with prescribed natural vibration mode shapes, Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 27 (2004), pp. 210–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Jensen, J. S. and Pedersen, N. L., On maximal eigenfrequency separation in two-material structures: the 1d and 2d scalar cases, J. Sound Vib., 289 (2006), pp. 967–986.Google Scholar
[19]Kim, T. and Kim, Y., Mac-based mode-tracking in structural topology optimization, Comput. Struct., 74 (2000), pp. 375–383.Google Scholar
[20]Li, H. and Tai, X., Piecewise constant level set method for interface problems, Int. Series Numer. Math., 154 (2007), pp. 307–316.Google Scholar
[21]Maeda, Y., Nishiwaki, S., Izui, K., Yoshimura, M., Matsui, K., and Terada, K., Structural topology optimization of vibrating structures with specified eigenfrequencies and eigenmode shapes, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 67 (2006), pp. 597–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Nelson, R. B., Simplified calculation of eigenvector derivatives, AIAA J., 14 (1976), pp. 1201–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Nishiwaki, S., Saitou, K., Min, S., and Kikuchi, N., Topological design considering flexibility under periodic loads, Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 19 (2000), pp. 4–16.Google Scholar
[24]Nocedal, J. and Wright, S., Numerical Optimization, Springer, New York, 1999.Google Scholar
[25]Olhoff, N., Maximizing higher order eigenfrequencies of beams with constraints on the design geometry, J. Struct. Mech., 5 (1977), pp. 107–134.Google Scholar
[26]Olhoff, N. and Rozvany, G., Optimal grillage layout for given natural frequency, J. Eng. Mech. Div., 108 (1982), pp. 971–975.Google Scholar
[27]Osher, S. and Fedkiw, R., Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces, Springer, New York, 2002.Google Scholar
[28]Osher, S. and Santosa, F., Level set methods for optimization problems involving geometry and constraints: I. Frequencies of a two-density inhomogeneous drum, J. Comput. Phys., 171 (2001), pp. 272–288.Google Scholar
[29]Osher, S. and Sethian, J., Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations, J. Comput. Phys., 79 (1988), pp. 12–49.Google Scholar
[30]Pedersen, N., Maximization of eigenvalues using topology optimization, Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 20 (2000), pp. 2–11.Google Scholar
[31]Rudin, L., Osher, S., and Fatemi, E., Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms, Phys. D, 60 (1992), pp. 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32]Salahi, M. and Ganji, M., A generalized newton-penalty algorithm for large scale ill-conditioned quadratic problems, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comp., 4 (2009), pp. 273–278.Google Scholar
[33]Schiavone, P. and Ru, C., Solvability of boundary value problems in a theory of plane-strain elasticity with boundary reinforcement, Int. J. Eng. Sci., 47 (2009), pp. 1331–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[34]Tai, X. and Li, H., A piecewise constant level set method for elliptic inverse problems, Appl. Numer. Math., 57 (2007), pp. 686–696.Google Scholar
[35]Takezawa, A. and Kitamura, M., Sensitivity analysis and optimization of vibration modes in continuum systems, J. Sound Vib., 332 (2013), pp. 1553–1566.Google Scholar
[36]Tcherniak, D., Topology optimization of resonating structures using SIMP method, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 54 (2002), pp. 1605–1622.Google Scholar
[37] The Mathworks Inc., Matlab User’s Guide, Version 7, The Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, 2004.Google Scholar
[38]Wang, B. P., Improved approximate methods for computing eigenvector derivatives in structural dynamics, AIAA J., 29 (1991), pp. 1018–1020.Google Scholar
[39]Zhang, Z. and Cheng, X., A boundary piecewise constant level set method for boundary control of eigenvalue optimization problems, J. Comput. Phys., 230 (2011), pp. 458–473.Google Scholar
[40]Zhang, Z., Liang, K., and Cheng, X., A monotonic algorithm for eigenvalue optimization in shape design problems of multi-density inhomogeneous materials, Commun. Comput. Phys., 8 (2010), pp. 565–584.Google Scholar
[41]Zhang, Z., Liang, K., and Cheng, X., Greedy algorithms for eigenvalue optimization problems in shape design of two-density inhomogeneous materials, Int. J. Comput. Math., 88 (2011), pp. 183–195.Google Scholar
[42]Zhao, H., Chan, T., Merriman, B., and Osher, S., A variational level set approach to multiphase motion, J. Comput. Phys., 127 (1996), pp. 179–195.Google Scholar