Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:02:46.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lagrangian Mesh Model with Regridding for Planar Poiseuille Flow

Part of: Physiological, cellular and medical topics Partial differential equations, initial value and time-dependent initial-boundary value problems Special subfields of solid mechanics Numerical methods Biological fluid mechanics Coupling of solid mechanics with other effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2017

Jingxuan Zhuo ,
Ricardo Cortez  and
Robert Dillon
Jingxuan Zhuo*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Washington State University, USA
Ricardo Cortez*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Tulane University, USA
Robert Dillon*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Washington State University, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:[email protected] (J. Zhuo), [email protected] (R. Cortez), [email protected] (R. Dillon)
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:[email protected] (J. Zhuo), [email protected] (R. Cortez), [email protected] (R. Dillon)
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:[email protected] (J. Zhuo), [email protected] (R. Cortez), [email protected] (R. Dillon)
Get access

Abstract

Many biological settings involve complex fluids that have non-Newtonian mechanical responses that arise from suspended microstructures. In contrast, Newtonian fluids are liquids or mixtures of a simple molecular structure that exhibit a linear relationship between the shear stress and the rate of deformation. In modeling complex fluids, the extra stress from the non-Newtonian contribution must be included in the governing equations.

In this study we compare Lagrangian mesh and Oldroyd-B formulations of fluid-structure interaction in an immersed boundary framework. The start-up phase of planar Poiseuille flow between two parallel plates is used as a test case for the fluid models. For Newtonian and Oldroyd-B fluids there exist analytical solutions which are used in the comparison of simulation and theoretical results. The Lagrangian mesh results are compared with Oldroyd-B using comparable parameters. A regridding algorithm is introduced for the Lagrangian mesh model. We show that the Lagrangian mesh model simulations with regridding produce results in close agreement with the Oldfoyd-B model.

Keywords

Lagrangian mesh modelOldroyd-Bimmersed boundary methodviscoelastic fluidregridding methods

MSC classification

Secondary: 74F10: Fluid-solid interactions (including aero- and hydro-elasticity, porosity, etc.) 76Z05: Physiological flows 65M06: Finite difference methods 92C10: Biomechanics 74S20: Finite difference methods 74L15: Biomechanical solid mechanics
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , July 2017 , pp. 112 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Alpkvist, E., and Klapper, I. Description of mechanical response including detachment using a novel particle method of biofilm/flow interaction. Wat. Sci. Tech. 55 (2007), 265–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[2] Bottino, D. C. Modeling viscoelastic networks and cell deformation in the context of the immersed boundary method. J. Comput. Phys. 147 (1998), 86–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Chrispell, J., and Fauci, L. Peristaltic pumping of solid particles immersed in a viscoelastic fluid. Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena 6 (2011), 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Chrispell, J. C., Cortez, R., Khismatullin, D. B., and Fauci, L. J. Shape oscillations of a droplet in an oldroyd-b fluid. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 240, 20 (2011), 1593–1601. Special Issue: Fluid Dynamics: From Theory to Experiment.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Dasgupta, M., Liu, B., Fu, H. C., Berhanu, M., Breuer, K. S., Powers, T. R., and Kudrolli, A. Speed of a swimming sheet in newtonian and viscoelastic fluids. Phys. Rev. E 87 (Jan 2013), 013015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[6] Dillon, R., and Othmer, H. G. A mathematical model for outgrowth and spatial patterning of the vertebrate limb bud. J. Theor. Biol. 197, 3 (1999), 295–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Dillon, R., and Zhuo, J. Using the immersed boundary method to model complex fluidsstructure interaction in sperm motility. DCDS-Series B 15, 2 (2011), 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Du, J., Guy, R. D., and Fogelson, A. L. An immersed boundary method for two-fluid mixtures. J. Comput. Phys. 262 (2014), 231–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[9] Duarte, A. S. R., Miranda, A. I. P., and Oliveira, P. J. Numerical and analytical modeling of unsteady viscoelastic flows: The start-up and pulsating test case problems. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 154 (2008), 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Eytan, O., and Elad, D. Analysis of intra-uterine fluid motion induced by uterine contractions. Bull. Math. Biol. 61 (1999), 221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[11] Fauci, L. Peristaltic pumping of solid particles. Comput. Fluids 21 (1992), 583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Grove, R. R., and Chrispell, J. Immersed Boundary Modeling of Journal Bearings in a Viscoelastic Fluid. PhD thesis, Indiana University OF Pennsylvania, 2013.Google Scholar
[13] Joseph, D. D. Fluid Dynamics of Viscoelastic Liquids. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Larson, R. G. The Structure and Rheology of Complex Fluids. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.Google Scholar
[15] Li, M., and Brasseur, J. Non-steady peristaltic transport in finite-length tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 248 (1993), 129151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Oldroyd, J. On the formulation of rheological equations of state. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 200, 1063 (1950), 523–541.Google Scholar
[17] Peskin, C. S. The immersed boundary method. Acta Numer. 11 (2002), 479–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Teran, J., Fauci, L., and Shelley, M. Peristaltic pumping and irreversibility of a stokesian viscoelastic fluid. Phys. Fluids 20 (2008), 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Teran, J., Fauci, L., and Shelley, M. Viscoelastic fluid response can increase the speed and efficiency of a free swimmer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 3 (2010), 038101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Villone, M., Davino, G., Hulsen, M., Greco, F., and Maffettone, P. Particle motion in square channel flow of a viscoelastic liquid: Migration vs. secondary flows. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 195, (2013), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Waters, N. D., and King, M. J. Unsteady flow of an elastico-viscous liquid. Rheol. Acta 9 (1970), 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] White, F. M. Fluid Mechanics. McGraw-Hill, 1999.Google Scholar
[23] Wróbel, J. K., Cortez, R., and Fauci, L. Modeling viscoelastic networks in stokes flow. Phys. Fluids 26, 11 (2014).Google Scholar
[24] Wróbel, J. K., Lynch, S., Barrett, A., Fauci, L., and Cortez, R. Enhanced flagellar swimming through a compliant viscoelastic network in stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 792, 4 (2016), 775–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar