Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:20:22.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An All-Speed Asymptotic-Preserving Method for the Isentropic Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2015

Jeffrey Haack ,
Shi Jin  and
Jian‐Guo Liu
Jeffrey Haack*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53706, USA Department of Mathematics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
Shi Jin*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53706, USA
Jian‐Guo Liu*
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics and Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
*
Corresponding author.Email:[email protected]
Email:[email protected]
Email:jian‐[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The computation of compressible flows becomes more challenging when the Mach number has different orders of magnitude. When the Mach number is of order one, modern shock capturing methods are able to capture shocks and other complex structures with high numerical resolutions. However, if the Mach number is small, the acoustic waves lead to stiffness in time and excessively large numerical viscosity, thus demanding much smaller time step and mesh size than normally needed for incompressible flow simulation. In this paper, we develop an all-speed asymptotic preserving (AP) numerical scheme for the compressible isentropic Euler and Navier-Stokes equations that is uniformly stable and accurate for all Mach numbers. Our idea is to split the system into two parts: one involves a slow, nonlinear and conservative hyperbolic system adequate for the use of modern shock capturing methods and the other a linear hyperbolic system which contains the stiff acoustic dynamics, to be solved implicitly. This implicit part is reformulated into a standard pressure Poisson projection system and thus possesses sufficient structure for efficient fast Fourier transform solution techniques. In the zero Mach number limit, the scheme automatically becomes a projection method-like incompressible solver. We present numerical results in one and two dimensions in both compressible and incompressible regimes.

Keywords

35Q3565M0865M9976M1276N99Low Mach number limitasymptotic preserving schemesincompressible limitprojection schemeisentropic Euler equation
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 955 - 980
Copyright
Copyright © Global Science Press Limited 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Abarbanel, S., Duth, P. and Gottlieb, D., Splitting methods for low Mach number Euler and Navier-Stokes equations, Comput. Fluids, 17 (1989), 1–12.Google Scholar
[2]Bradford, B., The fast staggered transform, composite symmetries and compact symmetric algorithms, IBM J. Res. Develop, 38 (1994), 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Chorin, A., Numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations, Math. Comput., 22 (1968), 745–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Chorin, A., A numerical method for solving incompressible viscous flow problems, J. Comput. Phys., 2 (1967), 12–26.Google Scholar
[5]Colella, P. and Pao, K., A projection method for low speed flows, J. Comput. Phys., 149 (1999), 245–269.Google Scholar
[6]Crispel, P., Degond, P. and Vignal, M.-H., An asymptotic preserving scheme for the two-fluid Euler-Poisson model in the quasineutral limit, J. Comput. Phys., 223 (2007), 208–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Degond, P., Jin, S. and Liu, J.-G., Mach-number uniform asymptotic-preserving gauge schemes for compressible flows, Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics, Academia Sinica, New Series, 2(4) (2007), 851–892.Google Scholar
[8]Degond, P. and Tang, M., All speed scheme for the low Mach number limit of the isentropic Euler equation, Commun. Comput. Phys., 10 (2011), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Degond, P., Liu, J.-G. and Vignal, M.-H., Analysis of an asymptotic preserving scheme for the Euler-Poisson system in the quasineutral limit, SIAM J. Num. Anal., 46 (2008), 1298–1322.Google Scholar
[10] W. E and Liu, J.-G., Vorticity boundary condition and related issues for finite difference schemes, J. Comput. Phys., 124 (1996), 368–382.Google Scholar
[11]Gatti-Bono, C. and Colella, P., An analastic allspeed projection method for gravitationally stratified flows, J. Comput. Phys., 216 (2006), 589–615.Google Scholar
[12]Golse, F., Jin, S. and Levermore, C. D., The convergence of numerical transfer schemes in diffusive regimes I: the discrete-ordinate method, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 36 (1999), 1333–1369.Google Scholar
[13]Guillard, H. and Viozat, C., On the behaviour of upwind schemes in the low Mach number limit, Comput. Fluids, 28 (1998), 63–86.Google Scholar
[14]Gustaffson, B. and Stoor, H., Navier-Stokes equations for almost incompressible flow, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 28 (1991), 441–454.Google Scholar
[15]Harlow, F. H. and Amsden, A., A numerical fluid dynamics calculation method for all flow speeds, J. Comput. Phys., 8 (1971), 179–213.Google Scholar
[16]Harlow, F. H. and Welch, J. E., Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with free surface, Phys. Fluid, 8 (1965), 2182–2189.Google Scholar
[17]Jin, S., Efficient asymptotic-preserving (AP) schemes for some multiscale kinetic equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 21 (1999), 441–454.Google Scholar
[18]Jin, S., Asymptotic preserving (AP) schemes for multiscale kinetic and hyperbolic equations: a review. Lecture Notes for Summer School on “Methods and Models of Kinetic Theory” (M&MKT), Porto Ercole (Grosseto, Italy), June 2010. To appear in Rivista di Matematica della Universita di Parma.Google Scholar
[19]Jin, S. and Levermore, C. D., The discrete-ordinate method in diffusive regime, Trans. Theory. Stat. Phys., 20 (1991), 413–439.Google Scholar
[20]Kadioglu, S. Y. and Sussman, M., Adaptive solution tecniques for simulating underwater explosions and implosions, J. Comput. Phys., 227 (2008), 2083–2104.Google Scholar
[21]Kadioglu, S. Y., Sussman, M., Osher, S., Wright, J. P. and Kang, M., A second order primitive preconditioner for solving all speed multi-phase flows, J. Comput. Phys., 209 (2005), 477–503.Google Scholar
[22]Kadioglu, S. Y., Klein, R. and Minion, M. L., A fourth order auxilary variable projection method for zero‒Mach number gas dynamics, J. Comput. Phys., 277 (2008), 2012–2043.Google Scholar
[23]Klainerman, S. and Majda, A., Singular limits of quasilinear hyperbolic systems with large parametersand the incompressible limit of compressible fluids, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 34 (1981), 481–524.Google Scholar
[24]Klein, R., Semi-implicit extension of a Godunov-type scheme based on low Mach number asymptotics I: one dimensional flow, J. Comput. Phys., 121 (1995), 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Kurganov, A. and Tadmor, E., New high-resolution central schemes for nonlinear conservation laws and convection-diffusion equations, J. Comput. Phys., 160 (2000), 241–282.Google Scholar
[26]Larsen, E. W. and Morel, J. E., Asymptotic solutions of numerical transport problems in optically thick, diffusive regimes II, J. Comput. Phys., 83 (1989), 212–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Lax, P. D. and Liu, X.-D., Solution of two-dimensional Riemann problems of gas dynamics by positive schemes, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 19 (1998), 319–340.Google Scholar
[28]Liu, J.-G., Liu, J. and Pego, R. L., Stable and accurate pressure approximation for unsteady incompressible viscous flow, J. Comput. Phys., 229 (2010), 3428–3453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29]Swarztrauber, P., Fast Poisson solvers, in Studies in Numerical Analysis, ed. G. Golub, AMS, 1984.Google Scholar
[30]Temam, R., Sur l’approximation de la solution des equations de Navier-Stokes par la méthode des fractionnarires II, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal., 33 (1969), 377–385.Google Scholar
[31]Turkel, E., Preconditioned methods for solving the incompressible and low speed compressible equations, J. Comput. Phys., 72 (1987), 189–209.Google Scholar