Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:55:55.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Creating a Giant Component

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2006

TOM BOHMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15123, USA (e-mail: [email protected], [email protected])
DAVID KRAVITZ
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15123, USA (e-mail: [email protected], [email protected])

Abstract

Let $c$ be a constant and $(e_1,f_1), (e_2,f_2), \dots, (e_{cn},f_{cn})$ be a sequence of ordered pairs of edges on vertex set $[n]$ chosen uniformly and independently at random. Let $A$ be an algorithm for the on-line choice of one edge from each presented pair, and for $i= 1,\hellip,cn$ let $G_A(i)$ be the graph on vertex set $[n]$ consisting of the first $i$ edges chosen by $A$. We prove that all algorithms in a certain class have a critical value $c_A$ for the emergence of a giant component in $G_A(cn) (ie$, if $c \gt c_A$, then with high probability the largest component in $G_A(cn)$ has $o(n)$ vertices, and if $c > c_A$ then with high probability there is a component of size $\Omega(n)$ in $G_A(cn))$. We show that a particular algorithm in this class with high probability produces a giant component before $0.385 n$ steps in the process ($ie$, we exhibit an algorithm that creates a giant component relatively quickly). The fact that another specific algorithm that is in this class has a critical value resolves a conjecture of Spencer.

In addition, we establish a lower bound on the time of emergence of a giant component in any process produced by an on-line algorithm and show that there is a phase transition for the off-line version of the problem of creating a giant component.

Type
Paper
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Results similar to Theorems 1.5 and 1.6 were obtained independently by Flaxman, Gamarnik and Sorkin [10].