Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:08:05.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Approximating Cayley Diagrams Versus Cayley Graphs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2012

ÁDÁM TIMÁR
ÁDÁM TIMÁR*
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Mathematik, Universität Wien, Nordbergstrasse 15, 1090 Wien, Austria (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We construct a sequence of finite graphs that weakly converge to a Cayley graph, but there is no labelling of the edges that would converge to the corresponding Cayley diagram. A similar construction is used to give graph sequences that converge to the same limit, and such that a Hamiltonian cycle in one of them has a limit that is not approximable by any subgraph of the other. We give an example where this holds, but convergence is meant in a stronger sense. This is related to whether having a Hamiltonian cycle is a testable graph property.

Keywords

Primary 68R1020F65
Type
Paper
Information
Combinatorics, Probability and Computing , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , July 2012 , pp. 635 - 641
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Abért, M. and Szegedy, B. (2009) Residually finite groups, graph limits and dynamics. Banff reports, available at www.birs.ca/workshops/2009/09frg147/report09frg147.pdf.Google Scholar
[2]Aldous, D. and Lyons, R. (2007) Processes on unimodular random networks. Electr. Commun. Prob. 12 1454–1508.Google Scholar
[3]Aldous, D. and Steele, J. M. (2004) The objective method: Probabilistic combinatorial optimization and local weak convergence. In Probability on Discrete Structures (Kesten, H., ed.), Vol. 110 of Encyclopaedia Math. Sci., Springer, pp. 1–72.Google Scholar
[4]Bollobás, B. (1981) The independence ratio of regular graphs. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 83 433–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]de la Harpe, P. (2000) Topics in Geometric Group Theory, Chicago Lectures in Mathematics Series, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
[6]Elek, G. (2010) Parameter testing in bounded degree graphs of subexponential growth. Random Struct. Alg. 37 248–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Elek, G. and Lippner, G. (2010) Borel oracles: An analytic approach to constant time algorithms. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 138 2939–2947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Elek, G. and Szabó, E. (2005) Hyperlinearity, essentially free actions and L2-invariants: The sofic property. Math. Ann. 332 421–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Lovász, L. (2009) Very large graphs. In Current Developments in Mathematics 2008, International Press of Boston, pp. 67–128.Google Scholar
[10]Pestov, V. G. (2008) Hyperlinear and sofic groups: A brief guide. Bull. Symbolic Logic 14 449–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar