Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:18:41.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dimensional Psychopathology and Vulnerability to Psychosis: Envisaging the Third Generation of Prodromal/Ultra High-Risk Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letter
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

References

1. McGorry, PD, Nelson, B, Amminger, GP, et al. Intervention in individuals at ultra high risk for psychosis: a review and future directions. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009; 70(9): 12061212.Google Scholar
2. McGorry, PD, Killackey, E, Yung, A. Early intervention in psychosis: concepts, evidence and future directions. World Psychiatry. 2009; 7(3): 148156.Google Scholar
3. Cannon, TD, Cornblatt, B, McGorry, P. The empirical status of the ultra high-risk (prodromal) research paradigm. Schizophr Bull. 2007; 33(3): 661664.Google Scholar
4. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.Google Scholar
5. International Classification of Diseases. 10th ed. Geneva, Switzerland; World Health Organization: 1992.Google Scholar
6. Meyer, SE, Bearden, CE, Lux, SR, et al. The psychosis prodrome in adolescent patients viewed through the lens of DSM-IV. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2005; 15(3): 434451.Google Scholar
7. Raballo, A, Larøi, F. Clinical staging: a new scenario for the treatment of psychosis. Lancet. 2009; 374 (9687): 365367.Google Scholar
8. Haroun, N, Dunn, L, Haroun, A, et al. Risk and protection in prodromal schizophrenia: ethical implications for clinical practice and future research. Schizophr Bull. 2006; 32(1): 166178.Google Scholar
9. Olsen, KA, Rosenbaum, B. Prospective investigations of the prodromal state of schizophrenia: assessment instruments. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006; 113(4): 273282.Google Scholar