Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T19:48:20.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative Bioavailability of Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension and Extended-Release Mixed Amphetamine Salts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2021

Antonio Pardo
Affiliation:
Tris Pharma, Inc., Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA
Mohammed Bouhajib
Affiliation:
Pharma Medica Research Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, CA, USA
Eman Rafla
Affiliation:
Tris Pharma, Inc., Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA
Thomas R. King
Affiliation:
Tris Pharma, Inc., Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA
Judith C. Kando
Affiliation:
Tris Pharma, Inc., Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Purpose

This open-label, single-dose, randomized, two-period, two-treatment, two-sequence, crossover study evaluated the comparative bioavailability between amphetamine extended-release oral suspension (treatment A: AMPH EROS, Dyanavel XR 2.5 mg/mL, 18.8 mg amphetamine base per 7.5 mL) and extended-release mixed amphetamine salts (treatment B: ER MAS, Adderall XR 30 mg capsules, equivalent to 18.8 mg amphetamine base per capsule) after a single dose in healthy adult subjects, under fasted conditions.

Methods

The crossover design allowed for intra-subject PK comparisons. Relative comparable bioavailability was determined by a statistical comparison of the AUC and Cmax parameters for both d- and l-amphetamine, where the geometric mean ratios for AUC and Cmax were within the 90% confidence limits (80.0%–125.0%) to determine comparable bioavailability between test products. Subjects in sequence 1 received treatment A followed by B; subjects in sequence 2 received treatment B followed by treatment A. PK samples were obtained at 0 (pre-dose) through 60 hours post-dose. The safety assessment was based on reported frequency and severity of adverse events.

Results

Thirty (30) subjects were enrolled and 28 completed. The mean age of subjects was 35 years, with a mean BMI of 25.9 kg/m2. Most subjects were Male (63.3%) and Black (56.7%). The geometric mean ratios for Cmax and all AUC measurements were within the 80–125% bound indicating comparable bioavailability between both test products. Both test products were generally well-tolerated with no serious AEs reported.

Conclusions

The bioavailability of a single 7.5 mL dose of AMPH EROS 2.5 mg/mL was comparable to a single 30 mg capsule dose of ER MAS. AMPH EROS (both d- and l-amphetamine) showed equivalent peak and overall exposure to ER MAS under fasted conditions.

Funding

Tris Pharma, Inc.

Type
Abstracts
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Footnotes

Presenting Author: Thomas R. King