Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:38:25.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

144 A Clinical Practice Assessment In Tardive Dyskinesia: Are Physicians Up-to-Date?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2018

Jovana Lubarda
Affiliation:
Medscape Education, New York, NY
Stacey Hughes
Affiliation:
Medscape Education, New York, NY
Christoph U. Correll
Affiliation:
Professor of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York; Investigator, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research; Medical Director, Recognition and Prevention Program, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Study Objectives

To assess physicians’ current knowledge, skills, competence, and practice barriers regarding tardive dyskinesia (TD) and assess continuing medical education (CME) needs.

Assessment Methods

A 29-question clinical practice assessment survey instrument consisting of multiple-choice knowledge and case-based questions was administered online to gather abaseline “snapshot” of knowledge, skills, attitudes, and competence on TD epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, current guideline-based management, and emerging management strategies

The survey launched online on a website dedicated to continuous professional development on July 25, 2016, and was made available to healthcare providers without monetary compensation or charge. Data were collected through August 28, 2016

Confidentiality was maintained and responses were de-identified and aggregated prior to analyses

Results

Data were collected for the 1157 psychiatrists and 177 neurologists who responded to all survey questions during the study period. The findings were:

  • Epidemiology: 62% of psychiatrists and 68% of neurologists were aware that TD affects approximately 20% of patients treated with neuroleptic agents

  • Risk factors: 63% of psychiatrists and 67% of neurologists were aware of risk factors for TD, such as older age

  • Diagnosis: 93% of psychiatrists and 71% of neurologists were aware that Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) can be used to support diagnosis of TD

  • Guidelines: 21% of psychiatrists and 11% of neurologists were aware of the American Psychiatric Association guidelines for monitoring of TD, and 56% of psychiatrists and 42% of neurologists were aware of the American Academy of Neurology guidelines on treatment of TD

New/emerging treatments: 24% of psychiatrists and 34% of neurologists were aware of the mechanisms of action of new/emerging treatments for TD, and 54% and 44%, respectively, were aware of the clinical data for valbenazine

Conclusions

This educational research yielded important insights into clinical practice gaps in TD, indicating that both psychiatrists and neurologists would benefit from continuing medical education on epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, guideline-based care, and information on how to incorporate new/emerging treatments for TD into practice.

Funding Acknowledgements

The educational activity and outcomes measurement were funded through an independent educational grant from Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

Type
Abstracts
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018