Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T20:24:23.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reactivity of Basal Surfaces, Steps and Edges of Muscovite: An AFM Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Z. Z. Zhang
Affiliation:
National Research Council, % U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 960 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
G. W. Bailey
Affiliation:
Ecosystems Research Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The reactivity of basal surfaces, steps and edges of muscovite was studied by imaging surface precipitates of PbCl2 using atomic force microscopy (AFM). We reacted PbCl2 solution with freshly cleaved muscovite surfaces and found that PbCl2 precipitates were formed on the basal surfaces, steps and edges. It was observed that PbCl2 precipitated preferentially along the steps compared to the basal surfaces and that PbCl2 precipitates at multiple-layer edges were needle-shaped and oriented in different directions. One of the muscovite samples we cleaved had muscovite fragments sitting on the freshly cleaved surfaces. These fragments resulted from previously formed cracks. Thus, we were able to compare the reactivity of the weathered surfaces with that of freshly cleaved surfaces. It was found that PbCl2 was not precipitated along the edges of previously cracked muscovite fragments. These results clearly demonstrated that the edges of freshly cleaved muscovite are the most reactive surface sites, whereas the edges of weathered muscovite are not as reactive. We believe that the surface reactivity of the edges of freshly cleaved muscovite is likely due to terminal or Al-OH1/2− groups on these crystalline surfaces, which favor adsorption of Pb2+ ions and the subsequent nucleation and precipitation reactions. We also investigated the effect of drying rate on the morphology of the surface precipitates. Fast drying resulted in a nearly complete covered surface with a leaflike morphology, whereas slow drying resulted in more isolated surface clusters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1998, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Allison, J.D. Brown, D.S. and Novo-Gradac, K.J., 1991 MINTEQA2/PRODEFA2, A geochemical assessment model for environmental systems: Version 3.0 user manual Athens, GA US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Binnig, G. Quate, C.F. and Gerber, C., 1986 Atomic force microscope Phys Rev Lett 56 930933 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binnig, G., 1992 Force microscopy Ultramicroscopy 42–44 715 10.1016/0304-3991(92)90240-K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleam, W.F. and McBride, M.B., 1985 Cluster formation versus isolated-site adsorption. A study of Mn(II) and Mg(II) adsorption on boehmite and goethite J Colloid Interface Sci 103 124132 10.1016/0021-9797(85)90083-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosbach, D. and Rammersee, W., 1994 In situ investigation of growth and dissolution on the (010) surface of gypsum by scanning force microscopy Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58 843849 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90509-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodde, A. and Neddermeyer, H., 1992 Nucleation and growth of Fe on Cu (111) in the monolayer range Ultramicroscopy 42–44 556561 10.1016/0304-3991(92)90323-C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotton, F.A. and Wilkinson, G., 1988 Advanced inorganic chemistry New York J. Wiley 1455.Google Scholar
Davis, J.A. Hem, J.D. and Sposito, G., 1989 The surface chemistry of aluminum oxides and hydroxides The environmental chemistry of aluminum 185219.Google Scholar
Dibble, W.E. Jr and Tiller, W.A., 1981 Non-equilibrium water/rock interactions. I. Model for interface-controlled reactions Geochim Cosmochim Acta 45 7992 10.1016/0016-7037(81)90265-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, P.M. and Hochella, M.F. Jr, 1993 Calcite precipitation mechanisms and inhibition by orthosphate: In situ observations by scanning force microscopy Geochim Cosmochim Acta 57 705714 10.1016/0016-7037(93)90381-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fendorf, S.E. Sparks, D.L. Fendorf, M. and Gronsky, R., 1992 Surface precipitation reactions on oxide surfaces J Colloid Interface Sci 148 295298 10.1016/0021-9797(92)90141-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fendorf, S.E. Li, G. and Gunter, M.E., 1996 Micromorphologies and stabilities of chromium (III) surface precipitates elucidated by scanning force microscopy Soil Sci Soc Am J 60 99106 10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000010017x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henisch, H.K., 1988 Crystals in gels and Liesegang rings New York Cambridge Univ Pr 197 10.1017/CBO9780511525223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochella, M.F. Jr, Hoch-ella, M.F. Jr and White, A.F., 1990 Atomic structure, microtopography, composition, and reactivity of mineral surfaces Mineral-water interface geochemistry Washington, DC Mineral Soc Am 87132 10.1515/9781501509131-007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochella, M.F. Jr Eggleston, C.M. Elings, V.B. Parks, G.A. Brown, G.E. Jr Wu, C.M. and Kjoller, K., 1989 Mineralogy in two dimensions: Scanning tunneling microscopy of semiconducting minerals with implications for geochemical reactivity Am Mineral 74 12331246.Google Scholar
Hohl, H. and Stumm, W., 1976 Interaction of Pb2+ with hydrous γ-Al2O3 J Colloid Interface Sci 55 281288 10.1016/0021-9797(76)90035-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M.L. and Bear, F.E., 1964 Chemical composition of soils Chemistry of the soil New York Reinhold 71141.Google Scholar
Jean, G.E. and Bancroft, G.M., 1985 An XPS and SEM study of gold deposition at low temperatures on sulphide mineral surfaces: Concentration of gold by adsorption/reduction Geochim Cosmochim Acta 49 979987 10.1016/0016-7037(85)90312-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, G. and Rammersee, W., 1996 Dissolution rates and activation energy for dissolution of brucite (001): A new method based on the microtopography of crystal surfaces Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60 50555062 10.1016/S0016-7037(96)00309-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junta, J.L. and Hochella, M.F. Jr, 1994 Manganese (II) oxidation at mineral surfaces: A microscopic and spectroscopic study Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58 49854999 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90226-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasaga, A.C., Lasaga, A.C. and Kirkpatrick, R.J., 1981 The atomistic basis of kinetics: Deficits in minerals Kinetics of geochemical processes Washington, DC Mineral Soc Am 261320 10.1515/9781501508233-011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.Y. and Jackson, M.L., 1977 Surface charge density determination of micaceous minerals by 235U fission particle track method Clays Clay Miner 25 295301 10.1346/CCMN.1977.0250407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Day, P.A. Brown, G.E. Jr and Parks, G.A., 1994 X-ray absorption spectroscopy of cobalt (II) multinuclear surface complexes and surface precipitates on kaolinite J Colloid Interface Sci 165 269289 10.1006/jcis.1994.1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohnesorge, F. and Binnig, G., 1993 True atomic resolution by atomic force microscopy through repulsive and attractive forces Science 260 14511456 10.1126/science.260.5113.1451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radoslovich, E.W., 1975 Micas in macroscopic forms Soil components 2 2757 10.1007/978-3-642-65917-1_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidegger, A.M. Lamble, G.M. and Sparks, D.L., 1996 Investigation of Ni sorption on pyrophyllite: An XAFS study Environ Sci Technol 30 548554 10.1021/es950293+.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stumm, W. and Morgan, J.J., 1995 Aquatic chemistry: Chemical equilibria and rates in natural waters New York J. Wiley 1022.Google Scholar
Weast, R.C. and Astle, M editors, 1982 CRC handbook of chemistry and physics Boca Raton FL: CRC Pr.Google Scholar
Weiser, H.B., 1935 Inorganic colloid chemistry The hydrous oxides and hydroxides 2 429.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z.Z. and Bailey, G.W., 1997 Precipitation/dissolution of lead compounds on surfaces of muscovite: An AFM study Agronomy abstract 195.Google Scholar