Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:00:20.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Method Using Growth Dynamics to Quantify Microbial Contamination of Kaolinite Slurries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Christopher W. Smith ,
Christopher M. Babb ,
Sara J. Snapp ,
Glenda B. Kohlhagen  and
Andrei L. Barkovskii
Christopher W. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Georgia College and State University, Milledgeville, GA 31061, USA
Christopher M. Babb
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Georgia College and State University, Milledgeville, GA 31061, USA
Sara J. Snapp
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Georgia College and State University, Milledgeville, GA 31061, USA
Glenda B. Kohlhagen
Affiliation:
IMERYS Pigments for Paper, 618 Kaolin Rd. Sandersville, GA 31082, USA
Andrei L. Barkovskii*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Georgia College and State University, Milledgeville, GA 31061, USA
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The early and sensitive detection of microbial contamination of kaolinite slurries is needed for timely treatment to prevent spoilage. The sensitivity, reproducibility, and time required by current methods, such as the dip-slide method, do not meet this challenge. A more sensitive, reproducible, and efficient method is required. The objective of the present study was to develop and validate such a method. The new method is based on the measured growth kinetics of indigenous kaolinite-slurry microorganisms. The microorganisms from kaolinite slurries with different contamination levels were eluted and quantified as colony-forming units (CFUs). Known quantities of E. coli (ATCC 11775) were inoculated into sterilized kaolinite slurries to relate kaolinite-slurry CFUs to true microbial concentrations. The inoculated slurries were subsequently incubated, re-extracted, and microbial concentrations quantified. The ratio of the known inoculated E. coli concentration to the measured concentration was expressed as the recovery efficiency coefficient. Indigenous microbial communities were serially diluted, incubated, and the growth kinetics measured and related to CFUs. Using the new method, greater optical densities (OD) and visible microbial growth were measured for greater dilutions of kaolinite slurries with large microbial-cell concentrations. Growth conditions were optimized to maximize the correlation between contamination level, microbial growth kinetics, and OD value. A Standard Bacterial Unit (SBU) scale with five levels of microbial contamination was designed for kaolinite slurries using the experimental results. The SBU scale was validated using a blind test of 50 unknown slurry samples with various contamination levels provided by the Imerys Company. The validation tests revealed that the new method using the SBU scale was more time efficient, sensitive, and reproducible than the dip-slide method.

Keywords

ContaminationDip-slide MethodSBU MethodKaoliniteMicrobial Growth Kinetics
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 61 , Issue 6 , December 2013 , pp. 517 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 2013

References

Allison, D.G. and Sutherland, I.W., 1987 The role of exopolysaccharides in adhesion of freshwater bacteria Journal of General Microbiology 133 1319–1327.Google Scholar
Andrews, W.H. and Presnell, M.W., 1972 Rapid recovery of Escherichia coli from estuarine water Applied Microbiology 23 521–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkovskii, A.L. and Fukui, H., 2004 A simple method for differential isolation of freely dispersed and particle-associated peat microorganisms Journal of Microbiological Methods 56 93–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bundy, W.M., 1990 Diverse Industrial Applications of Kaolin Clay Mineral Society, Special Publication 1 43–47.Google Scholar
Chenu, C., 1993 Clay- or sand-polysaccharide associations as models for the interface between micro-organisms and soil: water related properties and microstructure Geoderma 56 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, S.M. Bruns, J.C. and Kogel, J.E., 1996.U.S. Patent No. 5,496,398Google Scholar
Ehlers, K. Bünemann, E.K. Oberson, A. Frossard, E. Frostegård, Yuejian, M. and Bakken, L.R., 2008 Extraction of soil bacteria from a Ferralsol Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40 1940–1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frostegård, Courtois, S. Ramisse, V. Clerc, S. Bernillon, D. Le Gall, F. Jeannin, P. Nesme, X. and Simonet, P., 1999 Quantification of bias related to the extraction of DNA directly from soils Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65 5409–5420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, G. and Lagaly, G., 1980 Interaction of clay minerals with adenosine-5-phosphates Clay Minerals 28 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, W.G. and Ashworth, D.W., 2002 Microbiological problems in mineral slurries - control options in 2001 Special Publication Royal Society of Chemistry 282 123–132.Google Scholar
Herrington, T.M. Clarke, A.Q. and Watts, J.C., 1992 The surface charge of kaolin Colloids and Surfaces 68 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkinson, D. and Oades, J.M., 1979 A method for measuring adenosine triphosphate in soil Soil Biology and Biochemistry 11 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulkarni, S., 2005.Interactions between feather-degrading bacteria and an avian host: zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)Google Scholar
Lorenz, M.G. and Wackernagel, W., 1994 Bacterial gene transfer by natural genetic transformation in the environment Microbiological Reviews 58 563–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maron, P.A. Schimann, H. Ranjard, L. Brothier, E. Domenach, A.M. Lensi, R. and Nazaret, S., 2006 Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative recovery of bacterial communities from different soil types by density gradient centrifugation European Journal of Soil Biology 42 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, H.H., 1991 Overview - clay mineral applications Applied Clay Science 5 379–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, H.H., 2000 Traditional and new applications for kaolin, smectite, and palygorskite: a general overview Applied Clay Science 17 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandi, B.K. Goswami, A. and Purkait, M.K., 2009 Adsorption characteristics of brilliant green dye on kaolin Journal of Hazardous Materials 161 387–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyakairu, G.W.A. Koeberl, C. and Kurzweil, H., 2001 The Buwambo kaolin deposit in central Uganda: Mineralogical and chemical composition Geochemical Journal 35 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogram, A.V. Mathot, M.L. Harsh, J.B. Boyle, J. and Pettigrew, C.A., 1994 Effects of DNA polymer length on its adsorption to soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60 393–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osipov, G.A. and Turova, E.S., 1997 Studying species composition of microbial communities with the use of gas chromatographymass spectrometry: microbial community of kaolin. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 20 437–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paget, E. Monrozier, L.J. and Simonet, P., 1992 Adsorption of DNA on clay minerals: protection against DNasel and influence on gene transfer. FEMS Microbiology Letters 97 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pangburn, S.J. Hall, M.S. and Leach, F.R., 1994 Improvements in the extraction of bacterial ATP from soil with field application. Journal of Microbiological Methods 20 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papp, L. Balázs, M. Tombácz, E. Babcsán, N. Kesserü, P. Kiss, I. and Szvetnik, A., 2012 PCR-DGGE analysis of the bacterial composition of a kaolin slurry showing altered rheology. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 28 1843–1848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabenstein, A. Koch, T. Remesch, M. Brinksmeier, E. and Kuever, J., 2009 Microbial degradation of water-miscible metal working fluids. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 63 1023–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabuza, U. Sostar-Turk, S. and Fijan, S., 2012 Efficiency of four sampling methods used to detect two common nosocomial pathogens on textiles. Textile Research Journal 82 2099–2105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheraga, M. Meskill, M. and Litchfield, C. D., 1979 Analysis of methods for the quantitative recovery of bacteria sorbed onto marine sediments American Society for Testing and Materials 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sennett, P. and Brown, S.A., 1991.U.S. Patent No. 5,006,574.Google Scholar
Shelobolina, E.S. Pickering, S.M. Jr and Lovley, D.R., 2005 Fe-cycle bacteria from industrial clays mined in Georgia, USA. Clays and Clay Minerals 53 580–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tijhuis, L. Van Loosdrecht, M.C. and Heijnen, J.J., 2004 A thermodynamically based correlation for maintenance Gibbs energy requirements in aerobic and anaerobic chemotrophic growth. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 42 509–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Loosdrecht, M.C. Lyklema, J. Norde, W. Schraa, G. and Zehnder, A.J., 1987 Electrophoretic mobility and hydro-phobicity as a measure to predict the initial steps of bacterial adhesion. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 53 1898–1901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Olphen, H. and Fripiat, J.J., 1979.Data Handbook for Clay Materials and other Non-metallic Minerals.Google Scholar
Webster, J.J. Hampton, G.J. and Leach, F.R., 1984 ATP in soil: a new extractant and extraction procedure. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 16 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z.Y. Lin, W.X. Yang, Y.H. Chen, H. and Chen, X.J., 2011 Effects of consecutively monocultured Rehmannia glutinosa L. on diversity of fungal community in rhizo-spheric soil Agricultural Sciences in China 10 1374–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J. Bruns, M.A. and Tiedje, J.M., 1996 DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62 316–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed