Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:10:56.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Log selfsimilarity of continuous soil Particle-size distributions estimated using random multiplicative cascades

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Miguel Ángel Martín  and
Carlos García-Gutiérrez
Miguel Ángel Martín*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics to Agriculture Engineering, E.T.S.I Agrónomos, Technical University of Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
Carlos García-Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics to Agriculture Engineering, E.T.S.I Agrónomos, Technical University of Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
* E-mail address of corresponding author: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Particle-size distribution (PSD) is a fundamental soil property usually reported as discrete clay, silt, and sand percentages. Models and methods to effectively generate a continuous PSD from such poor descriptions using another property would be extremely useful to predict and understand in fragmented distributions, which are ubiquitous in nature. Power laws for soil PSDs imply scale invariance (or selfsimilarity), a property which has proven useful in PSD description. This work is based on two novel ideas in modeling PSDs: (1) the concept of selfsimilarity in PSDs; and (2) mathematical tools to calculate fractal distributions for specific soil PSDs using few actual texture data. Based on these ideas, a random, multiplicative cascade model was developed that relies on a regularity of scale invariance called ‘log-selfsimilarity.’ The model allows the estimation of intermediate particle size values from common texture data. Using equivalent inputs, this new modeling approach was checked using soil data and shown to provide greatly improved results in comparison to the selfsimilar model for soil PSD data. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov D-statistic for the log-selfsimilar model was smaller than the selfsimilar model in 92.94% of cases. The average error was 0.74 times that of the selfsimilar model. The proposed method allows measurement of a heterogeneity index, H, defined using Hölder exponents, which facilitates quantitative characterization of soil textural classes. The average H value ranged from 0.381 for silt texture to 0.838 for sandy loam texture, with a variance of <0.034 for all textural classes. The index can also be used to distinguish textures within the same textural class. These results strongly suggest that the model and its parameters might be useful in estimating other soil physical properties and in developing new soil PSD pedotransfer functions. This modeling approach, along with its potential applications, might be extended to fine-grained mineral and material studies.

Keywords

FractalsFragmentationIterated Function SystemsLog-selfsimilarityParticle-size DistributionRandom CascadesSoil
Type
Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , June 2008 , pp. 389 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © 2008, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Anderson, A.N. McBratney, A.B. and Crawford, J.W., 1998 Applications of fractals to soil studies Advances in Agronomy 63 1–76.Google Scholar
Arya, L.M. and Paris, J.F., 1981 A physicoempirical model to predict the soil moisture characteristic from particle-size distribution and bulk density data Soil Science Society of America Journal 45 1023–1030 10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500060004x.10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500060004xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caniego, F.J. Martín, M.A. and San José, F., 2001 Singularity features of pore-size soil distribution: singularity strength analysis and entropy spectrum Fractals 9 305–316 10.1142/S0218348X0100066X.10.1142/S0218348X0100066XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhabra, A. and Jensen, R.V., 1989 Direct determination of the α singularity spectrum Physical Review Letters 62 1327–1330 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1327.10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeGroot, M.H. and Schervish, M.J., 2002 Probability and Statistics 3rd New York Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Everstz, C.J.G. Mandelbrot, B.B., Peitgen, H. Jürgens, H. Saupe, D., 1992 Multifractal measures Chaos and Fractals Berlin Springer 921–953.Google Scholar
Falconer, K.J., 1994 The multifractal spectrum of statistically self-similar measures Journal of Theoretical Probability 7 681–702 10.1007/BF02213576.10.1007/BF02213576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, K.J., 1997 Techniques in Fractal Geometry Chichester, UK Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Haverkamp, R. and Parlange, J.Y., 1986 Predicting the water-retention curve from particle-size distribution: I. Sandy soils without organic matter Soil Science 142 325–339 10.1097/00010694-198612000-00001.10.1097/00010694-198612000-00001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolmogorov, A.N., 1992 On the logarithmic normal distribution of particle sizes under grinding Selected Works of A.N. Kolmogorov II 281–284.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B.B., 1982 The Fractal Geometry of Nature New York W. H. Freeman & Co..Google Scholar
Martin, M.A. and Taguas, F.J., 1998 Fractal modelling, characterization and simulation of particle-size distributions in soil Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 454 1457–1468 10.1098/rspa.1998.0216.10.1098/rspa.1998.0216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín, M.A. Rey, J.M. and Taguas, F.J., 2001 An entropy-based parametrization of soil texture via fractal modelling of particle-size distribution Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 457 937–947 10.1098/rspa.2000.0699.10.1098/rspa.2000.0699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M.A. Pachepsky, Y.A. Rey, J.M. Taguas, J. and Rawls, W.J., 2005 Balanced entropy index to characterize soil texture for soil water retention estimation Soil Science 170 759–766 10.1097/01.ss.0000190507.10804.47.10.1097/01.ss.0000190507.10804.47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montero, E. and Martín, M.A., 2003 Hölder spectrum of dry grain volume-size distributions in soil Geoderma 112 197–204 10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00306-3.10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00306-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taxonomy, S.o.i.l. (1975) A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. Agriculture handbook No. 436, Soil Survey Staff, Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Taguas, F.J., 1995 Modelización fractal de la distribución del tamaño de las partículas en el suelo Spain Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.Google Scholar
Taguas, F.J. Martín, M.A. and Perfect, E., 1999 Simulation and testing of self-similar structures for soil particle-size distributions using iterated function systems Geoderma 88 191–203 10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00104-9.10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00104-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turcotte, D.L., 1986 Fractals and fragmentation Journal of Geophysical Research 91 1921–1926 10.1029/JB091iB02p01921.10.1029/JB091iB02p01921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turcotte, D.L., 1992 Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, S.W. and Wheatcraft, S.W., 1989 Application of fractal mathematics to soil water retention estimation Soil Science Society of America Journal 53 987–996 10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300040001x.10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300040001xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, S.W. and Wheatcraft, S.W., 1992 Fractal scaling of soil particle-size distributions: analysis and limitations Soil Science Society of America Journal 56 362–369 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600020005x.10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600020005xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrscay, E.R., Peitgen, H.-O. Henriques, J.M. Penedo, L.F., 1991 Moment and collage methods for the inverse problem of fractal construction with iterated function systems Fractals in the Fundamental and Applied Sciences The Netherlands North Holland 443–461.Google Scholar
Wu, Q. Borkovec, M. and Sticher, H., 1993 On partice-size distributions in soils Soil Science Society of America Journal 57 883–890 10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700040001x.10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700040001xCrossRefGoogle Scholar