Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:18:25.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fe Substitution for Al in Glauconite with Increasing Diagenesis in the First Wilcox Sandstone (Lower Eocene), Livingston Parish, Louisiana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Michael E. Strickler  and
Ray E. Ferrell Jr.
Michael E. Strickler
Affiliation:
Basin Research Institute and The Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803
Ray E. Ferrell Jr.
Affiliation:
Basin Research Institute and The Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Glauconites in early ankerite concretions, ferroan calcite-cemented sandstones, and uncemented sandstones in the first Wilcox sandstone of the Lockhart Crossing field, Livingston Parish, Louisiana, show a progressive substitution of Fe for octahedral Al with increasing diagenesis. An octahedral Fe content of 0.50 atoms was calculated from glauconite located in early ankeritic concretions. Octahedral Fe averaged 0.60 and 0.90 atoms in later ferroan calcite-cemented sandstone and uncemented sandstone, respectively. Corresponding octahedral Al averages were 1.16, 1.03, and 0.67, respectively. A systematic increase in average interlayer K from 0.49 to 0.54 to 0.61 was also observed, with apparent increases in diagenesis. All element determinations were made with an electron microprobe and recast on an anion equivalent basis to structural formulae based on the O10(OH)2 unit. The clay preserved in the early ankerite concretions was found to be an illite/smectite containing about 20% expandable layers, and the mineral in the glauconite pellets from uncemented areas of the sandstone, an ordered glauconite. “Minus cement” porosities of the sandstone indicate that glauconitization may have taken place at burial depths greater than 0.6 to 1.8 km, but the mechanism for the incorporation of Fe3+ in the glauconite at that depth is not apparent.

Keywords

Ankerite cementDiagenesisGlauconiteIllite/smectiteIronPotassium
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , February 1990 , pp. 69 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © 1990, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Bailey, S. W., 1980 Summary of recommendations of AIPEA Nomenclature Committee Clay Miner. 15 85 – 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bence, A. E. and Albee, A. L., 1968 Empirical correction factors for the electron microanalysis of silicates and oxides J. Geol. 76 382 – 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentor, Y. K. and Kastner, M., 1965 Notes on the mineralogy and origin of glauconite J. Sed. Petrol. 35 155 – 166.Google Scholar
Bodine, M. W., 1987 CLAYFORM: A FORTRAN 77 computer program apportioning the constituents in the chemical analysis of a clay or other silicate mineral into a structural formula Computers and Geosciences 13 77 – 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boles, J. R. and Franks, S. G., 1979 Clay diagenesis in Wilcox sandstones of southwest Texas: Implication of smectite diagenesis on sandstone cementation J. Sed. Petrol. 49 55 – 70.Google Scholar
Bond, G. C. and Kominz, M. A., 1984 Construction of tectonic subsidence curves for the early Paleozoic miogeocline, southern Canadian Rocky Mountains: Implications for subsidence mechanisms, age of breakup, and crustal thinning Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 95 155 – 173.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, H. A., Bevan, J. C., Brown, K. M., Johnson, L. R. and Farmer, V. C., 1978 Glauconite and celadonite: Two separate mineral species Mineral. Mag. 42 373 – 378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burst, J. F., 1958 “Glauconite” pellets: Their mineral nature and application to stratigraphic interpretation Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 42 310 – 327.Google Scholar
Burst, J. F., 1958 Mineral heterogeneity in “glauconite” pellets Amer. Mineral. 43 481 – 497.Google Scholar
Cimbalnikova, A., 1971 Chemical variability and structural heterogeneity of glauconites Amer. Mineral. 56 1385 – 1392.Google Scholar
Galloway, W. E., 1968 Depositional systems of the Lower Wilcox Group, north-central Gulf Coast basin Trans. Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Soc. 18 275 – 289.Google Scholar
Hower, J., 1961 Some factors concerning the nature and origin of glauconite Amer. Mineral. 46 313 – 334.Google Scholar
Hower, J., Eslinger, E. V., Hower, M. E. and Perry, E. A., 1976 Mechanism of burial metamorphism of argillaceous sediment: I. Mineralogical and chemical evidence Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 87 725 – 737.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. and Renard, A. F., 1891 Report of Deep-Sea Deposits Based on the Specimens Collected During the Voyage of H.M.S. ‘Challenger’ in the Years 1872–1876 London H.M.S.O..Google Scholar
Odin, G. S., 1975 De glauconiarum constitutione, origine, aetateque Paris Univ. Paris.Google Scholar
Odin, G. S. and Matter, A., 1981 De glauconiarum origine: Sedimentology 28 611 – 641.Google Scholar
Odom, I. E., 1976 Microstructure, mineralogy and chemistry of Cambrian glauconite pellets and glauconite, central U.S.A. Clays & Clay Minerals 24 232 – 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odom, I. E. and Bailey, S. W., 1984 Glauconite and celadonite minerals Micas, Reviews in Mineralogy 13 Washington, D.C. Mineralogical Soc. Amer. 545 – 572.Google Scholar
Reynolds, R. C., Brindley, G. W. and Brown, G., 1980 Interstratified clay minerals Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and Their X-ray Identification London Mineralogical Society 249 – 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Self, G. A., Breard, S. Q., Rael, H. P., Stein, J. A., Thayer, P. A., Traugott, M. O. and Easom, W. D., 1986 Lockhart Crossing field: New Wilcox trend in southeastern Louisiana Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 70 501 – 515.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. R. and Hower, J., 1975 The mineralogy of glauconite Clays & Clay Minerals 23 289 – 300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twenhofel, W. H., 1936 The greensands ofWisconsin Econ. Geol. 31 472 – 487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, C. E. and Pollard, L. D., 1973 The Chemistry of Clay Minerals Amsterdam Elsevier.Google Scholar