Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Illite age analysis (IAA) is a classical method for extracting diagenetic and detrital ages from mixed ages measured by K-Ar. This approach is based on measuring the masses of diagenetic and detrital illitic components in a few different grain-size fractions of one rock sample and measuring the mixed ages of these fractions. The 1Md illitic polytype is usually considered to be diagenetic, while 2M1 is considered detrital. A plot of the function: exp(λt)−1 (where t is time and λ is the decay constant) vs. weight percent of the detrital fraction is constructed. On the basis of linear extrapolation to end-member fractions, the diagenetic and the detrital age is obtained. This approach does not take into account various K contents in different polytypes (%Kdetrital and %Kdiagenetic). In order to do that, the detrital mass fraction (wt.%detrital) should be recalculated into the percentage of detrital K (%Id(K)):
Analytical constraint of the K content of different polytypes is very difficult, so a new approach to this problem has been developed. In the present study, the plot of 40Ar*/40K vs. %Id(K) for a precisely determined ratio of 40Kdetrital/40Kdiagenetic was observed to be linear. On the basis of this observation, a computer program, MODELAGE, was written in the Java programming language using as input a few measured detrital illite mass fractions along with the mixed K-Ar ages of the relevant grain fractions. It then calculates the end-member ages and the 40Kdetrital/40Kdiagenetic ratio using genetic algorithms.
The errors in diagenetic and detrital illite mass-fraction determination mean that the 40Kdetrital/40Kdiagenetic ratio and the end-member ages can be evaluated only with some uncertainty. The best results are obtained if the measured mass fractions represent a relatively broad range. Constraining one of the unknowns (particularly the 40Kdetrital/40Kdiagenetic ratio) improves the results significantly.
Evaluation of data obtained from the literature using the proposed approach leads to the conclusion that the 40Kdetrital/40Kdiagenetic ratio is often >1.00, and some of 1Md illite polytype materials may be of detrital origin. If this is not the case, if a broad range of mass fractions is covered, and if the differences between end-member ages are relatively small, IAA analysis still gives appropriate results, even if the true 40Kdetrital/40Kdiagenetic ratio is different from 1.00.