Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:44:26.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimation of Heavy Atom Content and Distribution in Chlorite Using Corrected X-Ray Powder Diffraction Intensities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Jeffrey R. Walker*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
Michele M. Hluchy
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
Robert C. Reynolds Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
*
1Present address: Geology Department, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The heavy atom content and distribution in chlorite were estimated using the relative intensities of basal X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) peaks. For these peaks to be meaningful, however, corrections had to be made for the effects of sample thickness, sample length, and preferred orientation of the mineral grains, all of which are 2θ dependent. The effects of sample thickness were corrected for by a simple formula. The effects of sample length were accounted for by using rectangular samples and by ensuring that the sample intersected the X-ray beam through the range of diffraction angles of interest. Preferred orientation of mineral grains were either measured directly or estimated. Estimated values were quicker and easier to obtain and were within 5% of measured values. A comparison of the compositional parameters of chlorite estimated before correcting for these sample effects with those estimated after the corrections had been applied indicate that the uncorrected values differed from the corrected values by as much as 55% of the latter values. Mounts of a single sample prepared by different filter-membrane peel and porous-plate techniques yielded widely different compositions until the measurements were corrected for sample effects. Analyses in triplicate indicated that the XRD intensity ratio 003/001 is preferred for calculating heavy atom distributions and abundances in chlorite because of the relative strength of the 001 peak.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1988, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Brown, G., Brindley, G. W., Brindley, G. W. and Brown, G., 1984 X-ray diffraction procedures for clay mineral identification Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and Their X-ray Identification London Mineralogical Society 305360.Google Scholar
Drever, J. I., 1973 The preparation of oriented clay mineral specimens for X-ray diffraction analysis by a filter-membrane peel technique Amer. Mineral. 50 741751.Google Scholar
Johnsson, M. J. and Reynolds, R. C., 1986 Clay mineralogy of shale-limestone rhythmites in the Scaglia Rossa (Turonian-Eocene), Italian Apennines J. Sed. Pet. 56 501509.Google Scholar
Kinter, E. B. and Diamond, S., 1956 A new method for preparation and treatment of oriented-aggregate specimens of soil clays for X-ray diffraction analysis Soil Science 81 111120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petruk, W., 1964 Determination of the heavy atom content in chlorite by means of X-ray diffractometer Amer. Mineral. 49 6171.Google Scholar
Pollastro, R. M. (1982) A recommended procedure for the preparation of oriented clay-mineral specimens for X-ray diffraction analysis: Modifications of Drever’s filter-membrane peel technique: U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 82–71, 10 pp.Google Scholar
Reynolds, R. C. Jr., 1980 Quantitative analysis of kaolinite, illite, and mixed-layered illite-smectite by X-ray diffraction methods Prog. Abstracts, 29th Ann. Clay Conf Texas Waco 83.Google Scholar
Reynolds, R. C. Jr., 1986 The Lorentz factor and preferred orientation in oriented clay aggregates Clays & Clay Minerals 34 359367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, J. R., 1987 Structural and compositional aspects of low-grade metamorphic chlorite Ph.D. dissertation Hanover, New Hampshire Dartmouth College.Google Scholar