Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:45:58.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrophoretic Behavior of Imogolite under Alkaline Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Jutaro Karube
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Ibaraki University, 3998 Ami-machi, Ibaraki-ken, 300-03 Japan
Katsuya Nakaishi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Ibaraki University, 3998 Ami-machi, Ibaraki-ken, 300-03 Japan
Hideo Sugimoto*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Ibaraki University, 3998 Ami-machi, Ibaraki-ken, 300-03 Japan
Masami Fujihira*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Ibaraki University, 3998 Ami-machi, Ibaraki-ken, 300-03 Japan
*
1Present address: Technical Research Institute of Obayashi Corp., 4-640 Shimokiyoto, Kiyose-shi, Tokyo 204, Japan
2Research Institute of Mitsui Harbour and Urban Construction Inc., 3-2-11 Nishishinjyuku, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo 160, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Electrophoretic mobility of imogolite has been reported as positive (migration toward the negative electrode) below pH 9, and zero above pH 9. However, when mobility of dilute imogolite suspensions (5 × 10−3 kg/m3) was measured, it was found to be negative above pH 9. The reason that imogolite does not behave as a negative colloid when the clay concentration is not very dilute is because the imogolite forms floccules large enough to prevent migration. Imogolite has a PZNC at about pH 6, and has a PZC at pH 8.5–9.0 showing a relatively low absolute mobility under alkaline conditions compared to that under acid conditions. The fact that imogolite behaves like this is understandable given the location of negative charge appearing on the inside surface of the thin fibrous tube, according to the structural model of imogolite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1992, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Cradwick, P D G Farmer, V. C., Russell, J. D., Masson, C. R., Wada, K. and Yoshinaga, N., 1972 Imogolite, a hydrated aluminium silicate of tubular structure Nature Physical Sci. 240 187189 10.1038/physci240187a0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsh, J. B. and Xu, Shine, 1990 Microelectrophoresis applied to the surface chemistry of clay minerals Advances in Soil Sci. 14 131165 10.1007/978-1-4612-3356-5_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horikawa, Y., 1975 Electrophoretic phenomena of aqueous suspensions of allophane and imogolite Clay Science 4 255263.Google Scholar
Horikawa, Y., 1975 Electrokinetic behavior of allophane-imogolite mixtures in alkaline media Clay Science 4 265269.Google Scholar
Inoue, T. and Wada, K., 1971 Reactions between humified clover extract and imogolite as a model of humus-clay interaction: Part 1 Clay Science 4 6170.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L., 1956 Soil Chemical Analysis—Advanced Course 7176.Google Scholar
Karube, J., Sugimoto, H. and Nakaishi, K., 1990 Charge characteristics and electrophoretic mobility of allophane and imogolite Nogyodoboku Abstract of Annual Meeting 322323.Google Scholar
Mehra, O. P., Jackson, M. L. and Swineford, A., 1960 Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite-citrate system buffered with sodium bicarbonate Clays & Clay Minerals New York Pergamon Press 317327.Google Scholar
Sposito, G., 1984 The Surface Chemistry of Soils New York Oxford University Press 81.Google Scholar
Wada, K. and Greenland, D. J., 1970 Selective dissolution and differential infrared spectroscopy for characterization of “amorphous” constituents in soil clays Clay Miner. 8 241254 10.1180/claymin.1970.008.3.02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wada, K., Dixon, J. B. and Weed, S. B., 1989 Allophane and imogolite Minerals in Soil Environments 10511087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar