Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-29T06:41:53.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Exchangeable Cations on Hydraulic Conductivity of a Marine Clay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

S. Narasimha Rao  and
Paul K. Mathew
S. Narasimha Rao
Affiliation:
Ocean Engineering Centre, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras-600 036, India
Paul K. Mathew
Affiliation:
Ocean Engineering Centre, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras-600 036, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A laboratory study of the hydraulic conductivity (HC) of a marine clay with monovalent, divalent and trivalent cations revealed large differences in HC. The exchangeable cations employed in this study are Na, K, NH4, Mg, Ca and Al in order of increasing valency. An interpretation of the results derived from consolidation tests suggests that HC is significantly affected by the valency and size of the adsorbed cations. An increase in the valency of the adsorbed cations leads to quicker rates of consolidation and higher HC, while, for a constant valency an increase in the hydrated radius of the adsorbed cations results in a lower rate of consolidation and HC. The reduction in HC was related to the dispersion and deflocculation of clay. Lower valency and higher hydrated radii of the exchangeable cations enable the double layer repulsive forces to predominate, thereby increase dispersion and deflocculation.

Keywords

ConsolidationDispersionExchangeable cationHydraulic conductivity
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , August 1995 , pp. 433 - 437
Copyright
Copyright © 1995, The Clay Minerals Society

References

ASTM. 1991. Index to the powder diffraction file. Published by Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.Google Scholar
ASTM D 2435-80. 1989. Standard test method for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soils. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04–08, 283–287.Google Scholar
ASTM D 422-63. 1989. Standard test method for particle size analysis of soils. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04–08, 83–92.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S., Swindale, L. D., and El-Swaify, S. A. 1969. Effect of adsorbed cations on physical properties of tropical black earths. 1. Plastic limit, percentage stable aggregate and hydraulic conductivity. J. Soil Sci. 21: 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budhu, M., F. Giese, R. Jr., Campbell, G., and Baumgrass, L. 1991. The permeability of soils with organic fluids. Can. Geotech. J. 28: 140–147.Google Scholar
Carroll, D., and Starkey, H. C. 1958. Effect of sea-water on clay minerals: Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals, Washington, D.C., 80–101.Google Scholar
Cecconi, A., Salazar, A., and Martelli, M. 1963. The effect of different cations on the structural stability of some soils. Agrochimica 7: 185–204.Google Scholar
Ferrell, R. E. Jr., and Price, C. A. 1978. An experimental study of cadmium ion exchangeability. Clays & Clay Miner. 26: 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenkel, H., Goertzen, J. O., and Rhoades, J. D. 1978. Effects of clay type and content, exchangeable sodium percentage, and electrolyte concentration on clay dispersion and soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42: 32–39.Google Scholar
Grim, R. E., 1953. Clay Mineralogy. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L., 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India, 82–89.Google Scholar
Kielland, J., 1937. Journal of American Chemical Society 59: 1675.Google Scholar
Lambe, T. W., 1954. The permeability of fine grained soils. Special Technical Publication. American Society for Testing Materials 163: 123–126.Google Scholar
Mesri, G., and Olson, R. E. 1971. Mechanisms controlling the permeability of clays. Clays & Clay Miner. 19: 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, A. S., and Lin, C. S. 1954. Permeability of kaolinite. Industry and Engineering Chemistry 46: 38–45.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. K., 1993. Fundamentals of Soil Behavior. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 118.Google Scholar
Mohan, D., and Bhandari, R. K. 1977. Analysis of some Indian marine clays. International Symposium on Soft Clay, Bangkok, Vol. 1, 55–74.Google Scholar
Newland, P. L., and Allely, B. H. 1960. A study of the consolidation characteristics of a clay. Geotechnique 10: 62–74.Google Scholar
Pupisky, H., and Shainberg, I. 1979. Salt effects on the hydraulic coductivity of a sandy soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43: 429–433.Google Scholar
Quigley, R. M., and Thompson, C. D. 1966. The fabric of anisotropically consolidated sensitive marine clay. Can. Geotech. J. 3: 61–73.Google Scholar
Quirk, J. P., and Schofield, R. K. 1955. The effect of electrolyte concentration on soil permeability. J. Soil Sci. 6: 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranganatham, B. V., 1961. Soil structure and consolidation characteristics of black cotton clay. Geotechnique 11: 333–338.Google Scholar
Ravina, I., 1973. The mechanical and physical behavior of Ca clay soil and K clay soil. Berlin Ecol. Stud. 4: 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, R. K., 1949. Effect of pH on electric charges carried by clay particles. J. Soil Sci. 1: 1–8.Google Scholar
Shainberg, I., Keren, R., Alperovitch, N., and Goldstein, D. 1987. Effects of exchangeable potassium on hydraulic conductivity of smectite-sand mixture. Clays & Clay Miner. 35: 305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shainberg, I., Rhoades, J. D., and Prather, R. J. 1981. Effect of low electrolyte concentration on clay dispersion and hydraulic coductivity of a sodic soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45: 273–277.Google Scholar
van Olphen, H., 1962. An Introduction to Clay Colloid Chemistry. New York: Interscience, 92–110.Google Scholar
Vogel. 1978. Vogel's Text Book of Quantitive Inorganic Analysis: 4th Edition. Longman: English Language Book Society, 730–731.Google Scholar
Wada, K., and Beppu, Y. 1989. Effect of aluminium treatment on permeability and cation status of smectitic clay. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53: 402–406.Google Scholar