Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:51:59.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic Rheological Properties of Sodium Pyrophosphate-Modified Bentonite Suspensions for Liquefaction Mitigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Jisuk Yoon  and
Chadi El Mohtar
Jisuk Yoon*
Affiliation:
Fugro Consultants, Inc., 6100 Hillcroft, Houston, TX 77081, USA
Chadi El Mohtar
Affiliation:
Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-0280, USA
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The delivery of plastic fines such as bentonite into loose saturated granular soil deposits is an effective method for mitigating the liquefaction phenomenon. While the bentonite should be injected into the deposits in the form of a concentrated suspension, such application is limited in practice because of the low mobility of the suspension. The initial mobility of the bentonite suspension should be managed in order to increase the penetration depth. On the other hand, the suspension needs to maintain its thixotropic nature to improve the resistance of the treated soils under cyclic loading over time. The objective of the present study was to investigate the dynamic rheological properties of the bentonite suspensions modified with an ionic additive, sodium pyrophosphate (SPP), to evaluate a possible application of the modified suspensions in mitigation of liquefaction. In the present study, the storage and loss modulus of SPP-modified bentonite suspensions were measured using a strain-sweep (oscillatory shear) technique. Bentonite suspensions with clay contents of 5, 7.5, 10, and 12 wt.% (by total weight of suspension) were tested at various SPP concentrations (0 to 4 wt.% by weight of dry bentonite). The time-dependent behavior of the suspensions was evaluated with a critical storage modulus at various resting times (0 to 480 h). The results showed that the initial critical storage modulus decreased significantly with increasing SPP concentrations, but the reduced critical storage modulus increased gradually with resting times. This initial reduction in critical storage modulus is attributed to a reduction of the inter-aggregated 3-D networks due to the presence of SPP; the amount of 3-D network formed in a suspension governs the critical storage modulus. With time, the networks are formed gradually, resulting in recovery of critical storage modulus. The normalized modulus was degraded more slowly in the modified suspensions than in the unmodified suspensions, which is a desirable property of the suspensions for mitigation of liquefaction.

Keywords

Bentonite SuspensionLiquefaction MitigationPermeation GroutingSodium PyrophosphateThixotropy
Type
Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 61 , Issue 4 , August 2013 , pp. 319 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 2013

References

Abend, S. and Lagaly, G., 2000 Sol-gel transitions of sodium montmorillonite dispersions Applied Clay Science 16 201–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelsson, M. and Gustafson, G., 2007 Grouting with high water-cement ratios — literature and laboratory study Sweden Chalmers University of Technology.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.P., 2008 Investigation of time-dependent rheological behavior of sodium pyrophosphate-bentonite suspensions Indiana, USA Purdue University, West Lafayette.Google Scholar
de Kretser, R.G. and Boger, D.V., 2001 A structural model for the time-dependent mineral suspensions Rheologica Acta 40 582–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Mohtar, C.S. Clarke, J.P. Bobet, A. Santagata, M. Drnevich, V. and Johnston, C., 2008.Cyclic response of a sand with thixotropic pore fluid Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV (GSP 181)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Mohtar, C. Bobet, A. Santagata, M. Drnevich, V. and Johnston, C., 2013 Liquefaction mitigation using bentonite suspensions Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental. Engineering 139 1369–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, P.M. and Mitchell, J.L., 2002 Influence of colloidal silica grout on liquefaction potential and cyclic undrained behavior of loose sand Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 22 1017–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geier, D.L., 2004 Rheological investigation of bentonite based suspensions for geotechnical applications USA Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.Google Scholar
Goh, R. Leong, Y.K. and Lehane, B., 2011 Bentonite slurries-zeta potential, yield stress, adsorbed additive and time-dependent behaviour Rheologica Acta 1 1–10.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, J.L. and Martin-Vivaldi, J.L., 1963.Rheology of bentonite suspensions as drilling mudsGoogle Scholar
Haldavnekar, V. Bobet, A. Santagata, M. and Drnevich, V., 2003 Soil treatment with a thixotropic fluid: an autoadaptive design for liquefaction prevention Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering and 3rd Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering II 553–560.Google Scholar
Kelessidis, V. C. Tsamantaki, C. and Dalamarinis, P., 2007 Effect of pH and electrolyte on the rheology of aqueous Wyoming bentonite dispersions Applied Clay Science 38 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, S.L., 1996 Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering New Jersey, USA Prentice-Hall, Inc..Google Scholar
Leong, Y.K., 1988 Rheology of modified and unmodified Victorian brown coal suspensions Australia Melbourne University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Luckham, P.F. and Rossi, S., 1999 The colloidal and rheological properties of bentonite suspensions Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 82 43–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, J.F., 1939 The effect of iron on some physico-chemical properties of bentonite suspensions Soil Science Society of America Journal 3 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, F.T. and Müller-Vonmoos, M., 1989 The swelling behavior of clays Applied Clay Science 4 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J.K., 1993 Fundamentals of Soil Behavior 2nd New York John Wiley & Sons Inc..Google Scholar
Morris, G.E. and Zbik, M.S., 2009 Smectite suspension structural behavior International Journal of Mineral Processing 93 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Q.D. and Boger, D.V., 1985 Thixotropic behaviour of concentrated bauxite residue suspensions Rheologica Acta 24 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrish, K., 1954 The swelling of montmorillonite Discussions of the Faraday Society 18 120–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, D. and Lagaly, G., 2001 Influence of anions on the rheological properties of clay mineral dispersions Applied Clay Science 19 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polito, C.P. and Martin, J.R. II, 2003 A reconciliation of the effects of non-plastic fines on the liquefaction resistance of sands reported in the literature Earthquake Spectra 19 635–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tchillingarian, G., 1952 Study of the dispersing agents Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 22 229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Olphen, H., 1977 An Introduction to Clay Colloid Chemistry New York Wiley.Google Scholar
Weiss, A. and Frank, R., 1961 Uber den Bau der Gerüste in thixotropen Gelen Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 16 141–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, J., 2011 Application of pore fluid engineering for improving the hydraulic performance of granular soils USA University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Yoon, J.S. and El Mohtar, C. S., 2012 Time-dependent rheological behavior of modified bentonite suspensions Proceedings of GeoCongress 2012 1195–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar