Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:28:28.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diffusion of H2O and I in Expandable Mica and Montmorillonite Gels: Contribution of Bound H2O

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Yoshito Nakashima*
Affiliation:
Exploration Geophysics Research Group, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Central 7, Higashi 1-1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8567, Japan
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Self-diffusion coefficients of H2O molecules in water-rich gels of Na-rich expandable mica synthesized using natural talc were measured by pulsed-gradient spin-echo 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and the dependence on mica fraction (0.00–43.8 wt.%) and temperature (30.0–60.9°C) was examined. On the basis of the NMR results, the self-diffusion coefficient of H2O, Dwater, in the gel can be expressed by ln(Dwater/D0water) = 1.64[exp( −0.0588w) - 1], where D0water is the self-diffusivity of bulk water at temperature and w is the weight fraction of the mica (wt.%). The activation energy of H2O diffusivity in mica gel is nearly equal to that in bulk water. These findings indicate that the normalized diffusivity, Dwater/D0water, is independent of temperature. The diffusivity of I, Diodine, in the gels was examined by X-ray computed tomography (CT) at 22°C, and the influence of the mica fraction (0.00–24.8 wt.%) was studied to determine the contribution of bound H2O. The X-ray CT results show that the normalized I diffusivity, Diodine/D0iodine, obeys the above-mentioned phenomenological curve where D0iodine is the I diffusivity in bulk water. I is non-sorbing, and thus its diffusion is restricted only by the geometrical complexity of the pore structure of gels. Therefore, the effect of bound H2O molecules on average H2O diffusivity is negligible for w <24.8 wt.%. Diffusivity is governed by free or unbound H2O molecules diffusing in the geometrically complex and tortuous pore structure of mica-mineral grains. This is a result of the large population of unbound H2O far from the grain surface compared to the small population of bound H2O near the grain surface. The diffusion of I ions in montmorillonite gels was examined by X-ray CT for w <16.7 wt.% montmorillonite. The normalized iodine diffusivity, (Diodine/D0iodine) obtained is in reasonably close agreement with the literature data for the normalized diffusivity of H2O and is similar to the master curve of expandable mica. Therefore, bound H2O molecules near negatively charged clay surfaces do not play a major role in the H2O diffusivity for water-rich montmorillonite gels.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2002, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Callaghan, P.T., (1991) Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy Oxford, UK Oxford University Press 492 pp.Google Scholar
Cebula, D.J. Thomas, R.K. and White, J.W., (1981) Diffusion of water in Li montmorillonite studied by quasielastic neutron scattering Clays and Clay Minerals 29 241248 10.1346/CCMN.1981.0290401.Google Scholar
Chang, F-RC Skipper, N.T. and Sposito, G., (1995) Computer simulation of interlayer molecular structure in sodium montmorillonite hydrates Langmuir 11 27342741 10.1021/la00007a064.Google Scholar
Crank, J., (1975) The Mathematics of Diffusion Oxford, UK Oxford University Press 414 pp.Google Scholar
Denison, C. Carlson, W.D. and Ketcham, R.A., (1997) Three-dimensional quantitative textural analysis of metamorphic rocks using high-resolution computed X-ray tomography: Part I. methods and techniques Journal of Metamorphic Geology 15 2944 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1997.00006.x.Google Scholar
Duliu, O.G., (1999) Computer axial tomography in geosciences: an overview Earth Science Reviews 48 265281 10.1016/S0012-8252(99)00056-2.Google Scholar
Duval, F.P. Porion, P. and Damme, H.V., (1999) Microscale and macroscale diffusion of water in colloidal gels. A pulsed field gradient and NMR imaging investigation Journal of Physical Chemistry B 103 57305735 10.1021/jp9909210.Google Scholar
Fripiat, J.J. Letellier, M. and Levitz, P., (1984) Interaction of water with clay surfaces Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A311 287299 10.1098/rsta.1984.0029.Google Scholar
Furusawa, T., (1997) Synthesis and utilization of clay minerals Journal of Clay Science Society of Japan 37 112117 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Ichikawa, Y. Kawamura, K. Nakano, M. Kitayama, K. and Kawamura, H., (1999) Unified molecular dynamics and homogenization analysis for bentonite behavior: Current results and future possibilities Engineering Geology 54 2131 10.1016/S0013-7952(99)00058-7.Google Scholar
Johnson, C.S. Jr, Grant, D.M. and Harris, R.K., (1996) Diffusion measurements by magnetic field gradient method Encyclopedia of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance New York John Wiley & Sons 1626 1644.Google Scholar
Kita, H. Iwai, T. and Nakashima, S., (1989) Diffusion coefficient measurement of an ion in pore water of granite and tuff Journal of Japan Society of Engineering Geology 30 2632 10.5110/jjseg.30.84 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Kleinberg, R.L. and Vinegar, H.J., (1996) NMR properties of reservoir fluids The Log Analyst 37 20 32.Google Scholar
Krynicki, K. Green, C.D. and Sawyer, D.W., (1979) Pressure and temperature dependence of self-diffusion in water Faraday Discussions of the Chemical Society 66 199208 10.1039/dc9786600199.Google Scholar
Latour, L.L. Kleinberg, R.L. Mitra, P.P. and Sotak, C.H., (1995) Pore-size distributions and tortuosity in heterogeneous porous media Journal of Magnetic Resonance A112 8391 10.1006/jmra.1995.1012.Google Scholar
Lerman, A., (1979) Geochemical Processes: Water and Sediment Environments New York Wiley 481 pp.Google Scholar
MacGillavry, C.H. and Rieck, G.D., (1962) International Tables for X-ray Crystallography (Vol. III, Physical and Chemical Tables) Birmingham, UK The Kynoch Press 362 pp.Google Scholar
Madsen, F.T., (1998) Clay mineralogical investigations related to nuclear waste disposal Clay Minerals 33 109129 10.1180/000985598545318.Google Scholar
McBride, M.B., (1994) Mobility of small molecules in interlayers of hectorite gels: ESR study with an uncharged spin probe Clays and Clay Minerals 42 455461 10.1346/CCMN.1994.0420412.Google Scholar
Mills, R., (1973) Self-diffusion in normal and heavy water in the range 1–45° Journal of Physical Chemistry 77 685688 10.1021/j100624a025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monma, T. Kudo, M. and Masuko, T., (1997) Flow behaviors of smectite/water suspensions in terms of particle-coagulated structures Journal of Clay Science Society of Japan 37 4757 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Nakashima, S., (1995) Diffusivity of ions in pore water as a quantitative basis for rock deformation rate estimates Tectonophysics 245 185203 10.1016/0040-1951(94)00234-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakashima, Y., (2000) The use of X-ray CT to measure diffusion coefficients of heavy ions in water-saturated porous media Engineering Geology 56 1117 10.1016/S0013-7952(99)00130-1.Google Scholar
Nakashima, Y., (2000) Effects of clay fraction and temperature on the H2O self-diffusivity in hectorite gel: A pulsed-field-gradient spin-echo nuclear magnetic resonance study Clays and Clay Minerals 48 603609 10.1346/CCMN.2000.0480602.Google Scholar
Nakashima, Y., (2001) Pulsed field gradient proton NMR study of the self-diffusion of H2O in montmorillonite gel: Effects of temperature and water fraction American Mineralogist 86 132138 10.2138/am-2001-0114.Google Scholar
Nakashima, Y., (2001) Pulsed-gradient spin-echo NMR study of the H2O self-diffusivity in clay gels Magnetic Resonance Imaging 19 579 10.1016/S0730-725X(01)00336-8.Google Scholar
Nakashima, Y., Hirai, H., Koishikawa, A. and Ohtani, T. (1997) Three-dimensional imaging of arrays of fluid inclusions in fluorite by high-resolution X-ray CT. Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie, Monatshefte, December, 559568.Google Scholar
Nakashima, Y. Mitsumori, F. Nakashima, S. and Takahashi, M., (1999) Measurement of self-diffusion coefficients of water in smectite by stimulated echo 1H nuclear magnetic resonance imaging Applied Clay Science 14 5968 10.1016/S0169-1317(98)00049-0.Google Scholar
Ohtani, T. Nakano, T. Nakashima, Y. and Muraoka, H., (2001) Three-dimensional shape analysis of miarolitic cavities and enclaves in granite by an X-ray computed tomography Journal of Structural Geology 23 17411751 10.1016/S0191-8141(01)00033-5.Google Scholar
Olson, E.A. Han, K.S. and Pisano, D.J., (1981) CT reprojection polychromaticity correction for three attenuators IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 28 36283640 10.1109/TNS.1981.4331811.Google Scholar
Stejskal, E.O. and Tanner, J.E., (1965) Spin diffusion measurements: Spin echos in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient Journal of Chemical Physics 42 288292 10.1063/1.1695690.Google Scholar
Tateyama, H. Nishimura, S. Tsunematsu, K. Jinnai, K. Adachi, Y. and Kimura, M., (1992) Synthesis of expandable fluorine mica from talc Clays and Clay Minerals 40 180185 10.1346/CCMN.1992.0400207.Google Scholar
Tuck, J.J. Hall, P.L. and Hayes, M.H., (1985) Quasi-elastic neutron-scattering studies of intercalated molecules in charge-deficient layer silicates: Part 2 — High resolution measurements of the diffusion of water in montmorillonite and vermiculite Journal of the Chemical Society Faraday Transactions 1 81 833846 10.1039/f19858100833.Google Scholar
van Geet, M. Swennen, R. and Wevers, M., (2000) Quantitative analysis of reservoir rocks by microfocus X-ray computerized tomography Sedimentary Geology 132 2536 10.1016/S0037-0738(99)00127-X.Google Scholar
Wellington, S.L. and Vinegar, H.J. (1987) X-ray Computerized Tomography. Journal of Petroleum Technology, August, 885898.Google Scholar
Yu, J.W. and Neretnieks, I., (1997) Diffusion and sorption properties of radionuclides in compacted bentonite SKB Technical Report (Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.) 97–12 1 98.Google Scholar