Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:29:02.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crystal-Chemical Changes of Mixed-Layer Kaolinite-Smectite with Progressive Kaolinization, as Investigated by TEM-AEM and HRTEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Javier Cuadros ,
Fernando Nieto  and
Teresa Wing-Dudek
Javier Cuadros*
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
Fernando Nieto
Affiliation:
Departamento de Mineralogía y Petrología and IACT, Universidad de Granada-CSIC, 18002 Granada, Spain
Teresa Wing-Dudek
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
*
* E-mail address of corresponding author: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The mechanism for the kaolinization of smectite is extremely complex. The purpose of this study was to explore this mechanism by providing more microscopic information about kaolinite-smectite (K-S) intermediate phases. Crystal-chemical changes were investigated and integrated in a model of the transformation mechanism. Eight K-S samples from three localities, derived from volcanic ash beds, were studied using transmission and analytical electron microscopy (TEM, AEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM). The study completes a previous investigation, using several analytical techniques. The samples cover the range of K-S composition available from the previously studied sample set. Analysis by TEM indicated the preservation of particle morphology throughout the process. Most K-S particles had anhedral, smectite-like morphology, and only the most kaolinitic specimen revealed the coexistence of anhedral and euhedral, hexagonal particles. Analytical electron microscopy showed large chemical variations within samples, corresponding to various degrees of smectite kaolinization. Comparison of chemical results (Si/Al) and d060 values (proxy for octahedral composition) with the extent of kaolinization from thermogravimetry (TG) indicates that chemical changes in the octahedral sheet occur mainly when the proportion of kaolinite is 40–70%. The results above are consistent with kaolinization occurring via layer-by-layer transformation through the progressive loss of individual tetrahedral sheets in smectite layers and subsequent chemical changes in the octahedral sheet. Such a mechanism would produce the results observed in this study: (1) most particles preserve their original morphology; (2) significant variation in terms of the extent of transformation of particles within samples, and (3) formation of crystal structures intermediate between those of smectite and kaolinite, with parts of the tetrahedral sheets missing (kaolinite-like patches). Such structures become least stable at kaolinite ∼50%, when the perimeter of the kaolinite-like patches is largest and chemical changes in the octahedral sheet can occur more easily. Kaolinite layers could not be resolved by HRTEM in most cases and showed lattice fringes corresponding to superstructures. A model was established to quantify kaolinite and smectite layers in the HRTEM images with results which matched TG-derived values.

Keywords

HRTEMKaolinite-smectiteSolid-state TransformationTEM-AEM
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 57 , Issue 6 , December 2009 , pp. 742 - 750
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 2009

References

Amouric, M. and Olives, J., 1998 Transformation mechanisms and interstratification in conversion of smectite to kaolinite: an HRTEM study Clays and Clay Minerals 46 521–527 10.1346/CCMN.1998.0460505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahn, J. and Peacor, D., 1989 Illite/smectite from Gulf Coast shales: A reappraisal of transmission electron microscope images Clays and Clay Minerals 37 542–546 10.1346/CCMN.1989.0370606.Google Scholar
Bailey, S.W., Brindley, G.W. Brown, G., 1980 Structures of layer silicates Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and their X-ray Identification London Mineralogical Society 2–124.Google Scholar
Cliff, G. and Lorimer, G.W., 1975 The quantitative analysis of thin specimens Journal of Microscopy 103 203–207 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1975.tb03895.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuadros, J. and Dudek, T., 2006 FTIR investigation of the evolution of the octahedral sheet of kaolinite-smectite with progressive kaolinization Clays and Clay Minerals 54 1–11 10.1346/CCMN.2006.0540101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuadros, J. and Wing-Dudek, T., 2007 MAS NMR investigation of kaolinite-smectite structure using 6Li and 29Si with Mn exchange Clay Minerals 42 181–186 10.1180/claymin.2007.042.2.04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drief, A. and Nieto, F., 2000 Chemical composition of smectites formed in clastic sediments. Implications for the smectite-illite transformation Clay Minerals 35 665–678 10.1180/000985500547124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudek, T. Cuadros, J. and Fiore, S., 2006 Interstratified kaolinite-smectite: Nature of the layers and mechanism of smectite kaolinization American Mineralogist 91 159–170 10.2138/am.2006.1897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudek, T. Cuadros, J. and Huertas, J., 2007 Structure of mixed-layer kaolinite-smectite and smectite-to-kaolinite transformation mechanism from synthesis experiments American Mineralogist 92 179–192 10.2138/am.2007.2218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsass, F. Beaumont, A. Pernes, M. Jaunet, A.-M. and Tessier, D., 1998 Changes in layer organization of Na- and Ca-exchanged smectite materials during solvent exchanges for embedment in resin The Canadian Mineralogist 36 1475–1483.Google Scholar
Guthrie, G. and Veblen, D., 1989 High-resolution transmission electron microscopy of mixed-layer illite/smectite: Computer simulations Clays and Clay Minerals 37 1–11 10.1346/CCMN.1989.0370101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, G. and Veblen, D., 1990 Interpreting one-dimensional high-resolution transmission electron micrographs of sheet silicates by computer simulation American Mineralogist 75 276–288.Google Scholar
Güven, N. and Bailey, S.W., 1988 Smectite Hydrous Phyllosilicates Washington DC, USA Mineralogical Society of America 497–559 10.1515/9781501508998-018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieto, F. Ortega-Huertas, M. Peacor, D. and Arostegui, J., 1996 Evolution of illite/smectite from early diagenesis through incipient metamorphism in sediments of the Basque-Cantabrian Basin Clays and Clay Minerals 44 304–323 10.1346/CCMN.1996.0440302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, P.C. and Huertas, F.J., 2009 The temporal evolution of pedogenic Fe-smectite to Fe-kaolin via interstratified kaolin-smectite in a moist tropical soil chronosequence Geoderma 151 1–15 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.03.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurr, A.R., 1969 A low viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy Journal of Ultrastructural Research 26 31–43 10.1016/S0022-5320(69)90033-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Środoń, J. Andreoli, C. Elsass, F. and Robert, M., 1990 Direct high-resolution transmission electron microscopic measurements of expandability of mixed-layer illite/smectite in bentonite rock Clays and Clay Minerals 38 373–379 10.1346/CCMN.1990.0380406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tessier, D., 1984 Etude experimentale de l’organisation des materiaux argileux Paris Univ. Paris VII.Google Scholar
Van Der Pluijm, B.A. Lee, J.H. and Peacor, D.R., 1988 Analytical electron microscopy and the problem of potassium diffusion Clays and Clay Minerals 36 498–504 10.1346/CCMN.1988.0360603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar