Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T11:20:15.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clay Mineral Diagenesis in Core KM-3 of Searles Lake, California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

R. L. Hay ,
S. G. Guldman ,
J. C. Matthews ,
R. H. Lander ,
M. E. Duffin  and
T. K. Kyser
R. L. Hay
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Illinois, 1301 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801
S. G. Guldman
Affiliation:
Environmental Science Associates, 760 Harrison Street, San Francisco, California 94107
J. C. Matthews
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Illinois, 1301 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801
R. H. Lander
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Illinois, 1301 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801
M. E. Duffin
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Illinois, 1301 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801
T. K. Kyser
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada S7N 0W0
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Core KM-3 at Searles Lake, California, comprises 693.4 m of lacustrine sediments deposited over the past 3.2 m.y. The lake water evolved from moderately saline, slightly alkaline, and dominated by Na, Ca, Cl, SO4, and HCO3 + CO3 to a highly alkaline brine dominated by Na and CO, ions. Sediments are chiefly muds and evaporites. Montmorillonite and illite are the principal detrital clay minerals supplied to Searles Lake at present and probably during the late Pliocene and Pleistocene.

The drill core is divided into three diagenetic zones on the basis of clay-mineral reactions. The upper zone (0-291.1 m) contains authigenic Fe-illite, Mg-smectite, K-feldspar, and analcime, which average 60–70% of the <2-μm silicate fraction of mud samples. The principal silicate reactants are detrital montmorillonite and kaolinite, which have been largely consumed. The middle zone (291.1–541.6 m) also contains authigenic Fe-illite, Mg-smectite, K-feldspar, and analcime, but they form only 20 to 30% of the <2-μm silicate fraction, and considerable detrital montmorillonite and kaolinite remain unaltered. In muds of the lower zone (541.6–693.4 m), a small amount of clinoptilolite is the only authigenic silicate mineral identified, although authigenic montmorillonite probably coexists here as well. Vitric ash is the silicate reactant, and detrital clay minerals apparently remain unaltered in the lower zone.

Diagenetic zoning reflects the pore-water chemistry, in which pH may have been the most important parameter. Sediments of the upper zone were deposited in highly alkaline lakes of variable salinity, and sinking brines with a pH of 9.0–10.0 have saturated all sediments. Sediments of the middle zone were deposited in lakes of moderate to high salinity. The pH was overall lower than in the upper zone, although it probably exceeded 9.0, at least locally, during silicate diagenesis. Moderate salinity and a slightly alkaline pH (~ 7.5–8.0) are inferred for both the lake and pore water of the lower zone.

Oxygen-isotope values of authigenic Fe-illite, Mg-smectite, and K-feldspar, and phillipsite in the upper diagenetic zone reflect a high degree of evaporative concentration and presumably of salinity. Equilibrium water values calculated for 22°C from the oxygen-isotopic composition of authigenic phyllosilicates range from −3.5 to +1.9%, averaging −1.2% (SMOW). Higher salinities are suggested for K-feldspar, for which water values range from +1.8 to +4.8%, averaging +3.4‰ The water value for phillipsite is +0.3‰ By comparison, rainfall at Searles Lake has an average δ18O value of about −9.8%, and a brine sample has a value of +4.0‰

Mud samples of the middle and upper diagenetic zones tend to be rich in Fe-illite or Mg-smectite, but not in both, indicating that the two minerals are favored to some extent by different environments. Fe-illite seems to be generally favored by oxidizing conditions and probably by a playa environment, and Mg-smectite seems to be favored by reducing conditions and an open-water environment. One strati-graphic unit of the upper zone does not fit this pattern and contains abundant Fe-illite in sediments of a deep perennial lake.

Keywords

AnalcimeDiagenesisFe-illiteK-feldsparMg-smectiteMontmorilloniteOxygen isotopesPhillipsiteSearles Lake
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 84 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © 1991, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Bailey, S. W., 1980 Summary of recommendations of AIPEA nomenclature committee on clay minerals Amer. Mineral. 65 1 – 7.Google Scholar
Baldar, N. A. and Whittig, L. E., 1968 Occurrence and synthesis of soil zeolites Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 32 235 – 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, P., 1986 Quantitative analysis of sedimentary minerals by powder X-ray diffraction Powder Diffraction 1 37 – 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohlke, J. D., Alt, J. C. and Muehlenbachs, K., 1984 Oxygen isotope-water relations in altered deep-sea basalts Can. J. Earth Sci. 21 67 – 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, R.N. and Mayeda, T. K., 1963 The use of bromine pentafluoride in the extraction of oxides and silicates for isotopic analysis Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 27 43 – 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, H., 1961 Isotopic variations in natural waters Science 133 1702 – 1703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donahoe, R. J., Liou, J. G. and Guldman, S., 1984 Synthesis and characterization of zeolites in the system Na2O-K2O-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O Clays & Clay Minerals 32 433 – 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drever, J.I., 1973 The preparation of oriented clay mineral specimens for X-ray diffraction analysis by a filter-membrane peel technique Amer. Mineral. 58 553 – 554.Google Scholar
Droste, J. B., 1961 Clay minerals in sediments of Owens, China, Searles, Panamint, Bristol, Cadiz, and Danby lake basins, California Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 72 1713 – 1722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droste, J. B., 1961 Clay minerals in the playa sediments of the Mojave Desert, California Calif. Div. Mines Spec. Rep. 69 7 – 19.Google Scholar
Eberl, D. D., Środoń, J., Northrop, H. R., Davis, J. A. and Hayes, K. F., 1986 Potassium fixation in smectite by wetting and drying Geochemical Processes at Mineral Surfaces Washington, D.C. Amer. Chem. Soc 296 – 326.Google Scholar
Eslinger, E. V. and Savin, S. M., 1973 Mineralogy and oxygen-isotope geochemistry of the hydrothermally altered rock of the Ohaki-Broadlands, New Zealand geothermal area Amer. J. Sci. 273 240 – 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, I., Smith, G. I. and Hardcastle, K. G., 1976 Studies of Quaternary saline lakes—II. Isotopic and compositional changes during desiccation of the brines in Owens Lake, California, 1969-1971 Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 40 501 – 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, I., Smith, G. I. and Matsuo, S., 1982 Economic implications of the deuterium anomaly in the brine and salts in Searles Lake, California Econ. Geology 77 694 – 702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gac, J. Y., Al-Droubi, A., Fritz, B. and Tardy, T., 1977 Geochemical behavior of silica and magnesium during the evaporation of waters in Lake Chad Chem. Geol. 19 215 – 228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guldman, S. G., 1984 Silicate diagenesis in core KM-3 from Searles (dry) Lake, California Berkeley, California University of California.Google Scholar
Hallberg, G. R., Lucas, J. R. and Goodmen, C. M. (1978) Semi-quantitative analysis of clay mineralogy: in Standard Procedures for Evaluation of Quaternary Materials in Iowa, Hallberg, G. R., ed., Iowa Geol. Surv. Tech. Inf. Series No. 8, 109 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, R. L. and Guldman, S. G., 1987 Diagenetic alteration of silicic ash in Searles Lake, California Clays & Clay Minerals 35 449 – 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, R. L. and Moiola, R. J., 1963 Authigenic silicate minerals in Searles Lake, California Sedimentology 2 312 – 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hower, J., Hurley, P. M., Pinson, W. H. and Fairbairn, H. W., 1963 The dependence of K-Ar age on the mineralogy of various particle size ranges Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 27 405 – 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izett, G. A., 1981 Volcanic ash beds: recorders of Upper Cenozoic silicic pyroclastic volcanism in the Western United States J. Geophys. Res. 86 10.Google Scholar
Jones, B. F., 1986 Clay mineral diagenesis in lacustrine sediments Studies in Diagenesis 1578 291 – 300.Google Scholar
Jones, B. F. and Weir, A. H., 1983 Clay minerals of Lake Abert, an alkaline saline lake Clays & Clay Minerals 31 161 – 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odin, G. S. and Odin, G. S., 1988 Glaucony from the Gulf of Guinea Green Marine Clays Amsterdam Elsevier 225 – 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neil, J. R. and Taylor, H. P. Jr., 1967 The oxygen iso-tope and cation exchange chemistry of feldspars Amer. Mineral. 52 1414 – 1437.Google Scholar
Parry, W. T. and Reeves, C. C. Jr., 1966 Lacustrine glauconitic mica from pluvial Lake Mound, Lynn and Terry Counties, Texas Amer. Mineral. 51 229 – 235.Google Scholar
Savin, S. M. and Epstein, S., 1970 The oxygen and hydrogen isotopic geochemistry of ocean sediments and shales Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 34 43 – 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savin, S. M. and Lee, M., 1988 Isotopic studies of phyl-losilicates Hydrous Phillosilicates 19 189 – 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, R. A. and Fitzpatrick, J. J., 1989 Phillipsite from silicic tuffs in saline, alkaline-lake deposits Clays & Clay Minerals 37 243 – 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. I. (1979) Subsurface stratigraphy and geochemistry of Searles Lake late Quaternary evaporites, Searles Lake, California: U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1043, 130 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, G. I., 1984 Paleohydrologic regimes in the southwestern Great Basin, 0–3.2 my ago, compared with other long records of “global” climate Quat. Res. 22 1 – 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. I., Barczak, V. J., Moulton, G. F. and Liddicoat, J. C. (1983) Core KM-3, a surface-to-bedrock record of late Cenozoic sedimentation in Searles Valley, California: U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1256, 24 pp.Google Scholar
Środoń, J. and Eberl, D. D., 1984 Illite Micas 13 495 – 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tardy, Y., Cheverry, C. and Fritz, B., 1974 Néoformation d’une argile magnésienne dans les dépressions interdunaires du Lac Tchad—Application aux domaines de stabilité des phyllosilicates alumineux, magnésiennes et ferriferes Comptes Rendu. Acad. Sci. Francais 278 1999 – 2002.Google Scholar
Winograd, I. J., Szabo, B. J., Coplen, T. B., Riggs, A. C. and Kolesar, P. T., 1985 Two-million-year record of deuterium depletion in Great Basin ground water Science 227 519 – 522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, H.-W. and Savin, S.M., 1977 The mechanism of burial metamorphism of argillaceous sediments: 3. Oxygen isotopic evidence Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 88 1321 – 1330.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuretich, R. F. and Cerling, T.E., 1983 Hydrogeochemistry of Lake Turkana, Kenya: mass balance and mineral reactions in an alkaline lake Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 47 1099 – 1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar