Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:28:25.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of the Dynamic Cultivation System for Microorganisms — A New Way to Culture the Unculturables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

René Kaden*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Dag Hammarskjöldsväg 17, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden
Eve Menger-Krug
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Functional Interfaces (IFG), Herrmann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76131, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
Katja Emmerich
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Functional Interfaces (IFG), Herrmann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76131, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
Kerstin Petrick
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Functional Interfaces (IFG), Herrmann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76131, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
Peter Krolla-Sidenstein
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Functional Interfaces (IFG), Herrmann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76131, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To date, ~1% of all bacteria that occur in environmental ecosystems such as soil, sedimentary rocks, and groundwater have been described. Comprehensive explanation of ecological interactions on a microscale level is thus almost impossible. The Dynamic Cultivation System (DCS) was developed in order to detect more microbial taxa than with common cultivation approaches, as well as previously undescribed bacterial species. The DCS is a quick and easy in situ method for the cultivation of numerous bacterial taxa in support of the description of microbial colonized ecosystems. To investigate the bacterial populations within a clay-maturation process after mining the raw material, the DCS was used to increase the microbial biomass for further molecular analysis. Two different methods were applied to extract the bacteria from the DCS and these were compared in terms of efficiency at detection of large numbers of different taxa and in terms of applicability to the detection of previously undescribed species in raw clays. A collection of different undescribed species was detected with sequencing. While direct picking of bacterial colonies leads to the detection of different genera, species mainly of the genus Arthobacter were proved in the phosphate-buffered saline-suspended biomass. Thus, a combination of the approaches mentioned above is recommended to increase the number of detectable species. The DCS will help to describe better the microbial content of ecosystems, especially soils that contain charged particles.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 2014

References

Altschul, S.F. Gish, W. Miller, W. Myers, E.W. and Lipman, D.J., 1990 Basic local alignment search tool Journal of Molecular Biology 215 403410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bar-Yosef, B. Rogers, R. Wolfram, J. and Richman, E., 1999 Pseudomonas cepacia-mediated rock phosphate solubilization in kaolinite and montmorillonite suspensions Soil Science Society of America Journal 63 17031708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollmann, A. Lewis, K. and Epstein, S.S., 2007 Incubation of environmental samples in a diffusion chamber increases the diversity of recovered isolates Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73 63866390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacciari, I. and Lippi, D., 1987 Arthrobacters: Successful arid soil bacteria: A review Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation 1 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J.H. and Slayter, R.O., 1977 Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization The American Naturalist 111 11191144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiore, S. Dumontet, S. and Huertas, J.F., 2007 Clay minerals and bacteria Proceedings of Euroclay 2007, Aveiro, Portugal 6265.Google Scholar
Fischer, S.G. and Lerman, L.S., 1980 Separation of random fragments of DNA according to properties of their sequences Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America — Biological Sciences 77 44204424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glick, D.P., 1936 The microbiology of aging clays Journal of the American Ceramic Society 19 169175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotz, D. Banta, A. Beveridge, T.J. Rushdi, A.I. Simoneit, B.R.T. and Reysenbach, A., 2002 Persephonella marina gen. Nov., sp nov and Persephonella guaymasensis sp nov., two novel, thermophilic, hydrogen-oxidizing microaerophiles from deep-sea hydrothermal vents International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 52 13491359.Google ScholarPubMed
Groudeva, V.I. and Groudev, S.N., 1995 Microorganisms improve kaolin properties American Ceramic Society Bulletin 74 8589.Google Scholar
Janda, J.M. and Abbott, S.L., 2002 Bacterial identification for publication - when is enough enough? Journal of Clinical Microbiology 40 18871891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaden, R. Menger-Krug, E. and Krolla-Sidenstein, P., 2009.NCBI Pop Set [261288875]: Population analysis of clay. NCBI databaseGoogle Scholar
Kaden, R. and Krolla-Sidenstein, P., 2009.NCBI PopSet [261288870]: The Dynamic Cultivation System, a new method to show temporal shifts in microbial community structure. NCBI databaseGoogle Scholar
Kaden, R. Menger-Krug, E. Emmerich, K. Petrick, K. Mühling, M. and Krolla-Sidenstein, P., 2012 The dynamic cultivation system: A new method for the detection of temporal shifts in microbial community structure in clay Applied Clay Science 65-66 5356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaeberlein, T. Lewis, K. and Epstein, S.S., 2002 Isolating “uncultivable” microorganisms in pure culture in a simulated natural environment Science 296 11271129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. Dong, H.L. Seabaugh, J. Newell, S.W. and Eberl, D.D., 2004 Role of microbes in the smectite-to-illite reaction Science 303 830832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirk, J.L. Beaudette, L.A. Hart, M. Moutoglis, P. Khironomos, J.N. Lee, H. and Trevors, J.T., 2004 Methods of studying soil microbial diversity Journal of Microbiological Methods 58 169188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, J.G. and Singleton, F.L., 1992 Variations in rRNA content of marine vibrio spp. During starvation-survival and recovery Applied and Environmental Microbiology 58 201207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larkin, M.A. Blackshields, G. Brown, N.P. Chenna, R. McGettigan, P.A. McWilliam, H. Valentin, F. Wallace, I.M. Wilm, A. Lopez, R. Thompson, J.D. Gibson, T.J. and Higgins, D.G., 2007 Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0 Bioinformatics 23 29472948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mongodin, E.F. Shapir, N. Daugherty, S.C. DeBoy, R.T. Emerson, J.B. Shvartzbeyn, A. Radune, D. Vamathevan, J. Riggs, F. Grinberg, V. Khouri, H. Wackett, L.P. Nelson, K.E. and Sadowsky, M.J., 2006 Secrets of soil survival revealed by the genome sequence of arthrobacter aurescens tc1 PLoS Genet 2 e214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, S.B. Dunn, A.K. Klimowicz, A.K. and Handelsman, J., 2006 Peptidoglycan from bacillus cereus mediates commensalism with rhizosphere bacteria from the cytophaga-flavobacterium group Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72 54215427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrick, K. Diedel, R. Peuker, M. Dieterle, M. Kuch, P. Kaden, R. Krolla-Sidenstein, P. Schuhmann, R. and Emmerich, K., 2011 Character and amount of I-S mixedlayer minerals and physical-chemical parameters of two ceramic clays from Westerwald, Germany: Implications for processing properties Clays and Clay Minerals 59 5874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
QIAGEN, 2003 QIAamp DNA Mini Kit and QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit 02/2003 User manual 3336.Google Scholar
Rinder, G., 1979 Einfluß von tonmineralen auf der verhalten von acidophilen thiobacillus-arten in suspensionen Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Mikrobiologie 19 643651.Google Scholar
Schuppler, M. Mertens, F. Schon, G. and Gobel, U.B., 1995 Molecular characterization of nocardioform actinomycetes in activated-sludge by 16S rRNA analysis Microbiology 141 513521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stackebrandt, E., 2009 Phylogeny Based on 16S rRNA/DNA. eLS Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Stinear, T. Jentkin, G.A. Johnson, P.D.R. and Davies, J.K., 2000 Comparative genetic analysis of Mycobacterium ulcerans and Mycobacterium marinum reveals evidence of recent divergence Journal of Bacteriology 182 63226330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takada-Hoshino, Y. and Naoyuki, M., 2004 An improved DNA extraction method using skim milk from soils that strongly adsorb DNA Microbes and Environments 19 1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telle, R., 2007 Salmang scholze keramik 7th edition Berlin, Heidelberg Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaiberg, S.N. Vlasov, A.S. and Skripnik, V.P., 1980 Treating clays with silicate bacteria Glass and Ceramics 37 387389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varnam, A.H. and Evans, G.G., 2000 Environmental Microbiology London Manson Publishing.Google Scholar
Velde, B., 1995 Origin and Mineralogy of Clays. Clays and the Environment New York Springer-Verlag 358 pp..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, A., 1963 A secret of Chinese porcelain manufacture Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English 2 697703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeelmaekers, E. McCarty, D. and Mystkowski, K., 2007.SYBILLA user manual. Chevron proprietary software, Houston, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
Zhang, G.X. Kim, J.W. Dong, H.L. and Sommer, A.J., 2007 Microbial effects in promoting the smectite to illite reaction: Role of organic matter intercalated in the interlayer American Mineralogist 92 14011410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar