Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:15:47.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adsorption of a C10E3 Non-Ionic Surfactant on a Ca-Smectite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Regis Guegan ,
Mathieu Gautier ,
Jean-Michel Beny  and
Fabrice Muller
Regis Guegan*
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences de la Terre d’Orléans, CNRS-Université d’Orléans, 1A Rue de la Ferollerie, 45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France
Mathieu Gautier
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences de la Terre d’Orléans, CNRS-Université d’Orléans, 1A Rue de la Ferollerie, 45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France
Jean-Michel Beny
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences de la Terre d’Orléans, CNRS-Université d’Orléans, 1A Rue de la Ferollerie, 45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France
Fabrice Muller
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences de la Terre d’Orléans, CNRS-Université d’Orléans, 1A Rue de la Ferollerie, 45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France
*
* E-mail address of corresponding author: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The transformation of clay minerals into organo-clays by surfactant intercalation is of great environmental and industrial importance because it causes the clay to attract hydrophobic contaminants and other non-polar organic compounds, but a better understanding is needed of the mechanisms by which different classes of surfactants are intercalated. The purpose of this study was to synthesize and characterize an organo-clay comprising triethylene glycol monodecyl ether (C10E3) non-ionic surfactant, which has a lamellar phase at room temperature, intercalated into Ca-montmorillonite from Wyoming (SWy-2). The C10E3 non-ionic surfactant differed from previous non-ionic surfactants used in the formation of a lamellar phase in that it consisted of the stacking of molecules by hydrophobic interaction. C10E3-clay composites were characterized by complementary techniques (adsorption isotherms, X-ray diffraction, and infrared spectroscopy) and were compared to benzyldimethyltetradecyl ammonium chloride (BDTAC) cationic surfactant-clay composites for different loadings of the surfactant. For large loadings, the amount of C10E3 adsorbed, which can be described by the Langmuir equation, seemed to reach a steady state close to that of the cationic surfactant. The adsorption processes of the two surfactants were different. For the cationic surfactant, the adsorption, as described in the literature, was due to ion exchange between organic cations and Ca2+ counterions. The adsorption of C10E3 did not depend on electrostatic interaction but rather was due to several interaction mechanisms (H-bonding, ion-dipole, and hydrophobic interaction). For both surfactants, the expansion was limited to two adsorbed monolayers parallel to the clay surface. The expansion of the basal spacing to 17 Å suggested a complete dissociation of the C10E3 lamellar phase when adsorbed on the Ca-smectite. Organo-clays made using the non-ionic surfactant were stable, changing the chemical nature of clay to hydrophobic, and allowing for other cations to be exchanged, which has importance in the manufacture of new nanocomposites or geochemical barriers.

Keywords

Ca-smectiteInfrared SpectroscopyOrgano-claySurfactantX-ray Diffraction
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , August 2009 , pp. 502 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 2009

References

Boyd, S.A. Shaobai, S. Lee, J.-F. and Mortland, M.M., 1988 Pentachlorophenol sorption by organo-clays Clays and Clay Minerals 36 125–130 10.1346/CCMN.1988.0360204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, C. Watson, R. Madejová, J. Komadel, P. and Klapyta, Z., 1997 Acid-activated organo-clays: Preparation, characterization and catalytic activity of acid-treated tetraalkylammonium-exchanged smectites Langmuir 13 6473–6479 10.1021/la970507w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Y. Dixon, J.B. and White, G.N., 2003 Intercalation and surface modification of smectite by two non-ionic surfactants Clays and Clay Minerals 51 150–161 10.1346/CCMN.2003.0510204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Y. Dixon, J.B. and White, G.N., 2006 Bonding mechanisms and conformation of poly(ethylene oxide)-based surfactants in interlayer of smectite Colloid Polymer Science 284 347–356 10.1007/s00396-005-1388-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Y. Dixon, J.B. and White, G.N., 2006 Adsorption of polyacrylamide on smectite, illite, and kaolinite Soil Science Society of America Journal 70 297–304 10.2136/sssaj2005.0200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dentel, S.K. Bottero, J.Y. Khatib, K. Demougeot, H. Duguet, J.P. and Anselme, C., 1995 Sorption of tannic acid, phenol, and 2,4,5-trichlorophenol on organo-clays Water Research 29 1273–1280 10.1016/0043-1354(94)00277-E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, E. Manias, E. and Giannelis, E.P., 2000 Computer simulation studies of PEO/Layer silicate nanocomposites Chemistry of Materials 12 2161–2167 10.1021/cm990676x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, H.P. Guo, J.G. Xie, X.D. and Peng, J.L., 2001 Location and migration of cations in Cu2+-adsorbed montmorillonite Environment International 26 347–352 10.1016/S0160-4120(01)00011-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaynes, W.F. and Boyd, S.A., 1991 Hydrophobicity of siloxane surfaces in smectites as revealed by aromatic hydrocarbon adsorption from water Clays and Clay Minerals 39 428–436 10.1346/CCMN.1991.0390412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J.-H. Shin, W.S. Kim, Y.-H. Choi, S.J. Jeon, Y.W. and Song, D.-I., 2003 Sequential sorption and desorption of chlorinated phenols in organo-clays Water Science and Technology 47 59–64 10.2166/wst.2003.0492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, T.D. Olsson, U. Mortensen, K. Zipfel, J. and Richtering, W., 2001 Nonionic amphiphilic bilayer structures under shear Langmuir 17 999–1008 10.1021/la001227a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBaron, P.C. Wang, Z. and Pinnavaia, T.J., 1999 Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: an overview Applied Clay Science 15 11–29 10.1016/S0169-1317(99)00017-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.Y. Cho, W.J. Hahn, P.S. Lee, M. Lee, Y.B. and Kim, K.J., 2005 Microstructural changes of reference montmorillonites by cationic surfactants Applied Clay Science 30 174–180 10.1016/j.clay.2005.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, L.P. and Kahr, G., 1999 Determination of the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of clay minerals using the complexes of copper (II) ion with triethylenetetramine and tetraethylenepentamine Clays and Clay Minerals 47 386–388 10.1346/CCMN.1999.0470315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortland, M.M. Shaobai, S. and Boyd, S.A., 1986 Clay-organic complexes as adsorbents for phenol and chlorophenols Clays and Clay Minerals 34 581–585 10.1346/CCMN.1986.0340512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Othmani-Assmann, H. Benna-Zayani, M. Geiger, S. Fraisse, B. Kbir-Ariguib, N. Trabelsi-Ayadi, M. Ghermani, N.E. and Grossiord, J.L., 2007 Physico-chemical characterizations of Tunisian organophilic bentonites The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 111 10869–10877 10.1021/jp068814a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peker, S. Yapar, S. and Besün, N., 1995 Adsorption behavior of a cationic surfactant on montmorillonite Colloids and Surfaces 104 249–257 10.1016/0927-7757(95)03280-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portet, F. Desbene, P.L. and Treiner, C., 1998 Polydispersity of a non-ionic surfactant as related to its adsorption characteristics on porous silica particles in water Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 208 415–421 10.1006/jcis.1998.5851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prost, R. and Yaron, B., 2001 Use of modified clays for controlling soil environmental quality Soil Science 166 880–895 10.1097/00010694-200112000-00003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodier, N. Dugue, J. Ceolin, R. Baziard-Mouysset, G. Stigliani, J.-L. and Payard, M., 1995 Bromure de Benzododécinium Monohydrate Acta Crystallographica C 51 954–956 10.1107/S0108270194014435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tahani, A. Karroua, M. Van Damme, H. Levitz, P. and Bergaya, F., 1999 Adsorption of a cationic surfactant on Na-Montmorillonite: Inspection of adsorption layer by X-ray and fluorescence spectroscopies Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 216 242–249 10.1006/jcis.1999.6318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trompette, J.L. Zajac, J. Keh, E. and Partyka, S., 1994 Scanning of the cationic surfactant adsorption on a hydrophilic silica surface at low surface coverages Langmuir 10 812–818 10.1021/la00015a036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xi, Y. Frost, R.L. He, H. Kloprogge, T. and Bostrom, T., 2005 Modification of Wyoming montmorillonite surfaces using a cationic surfactant Langmuir 21 8675–8680 10.1021/la051454i.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, S. and Boyd, S.A., 1995 Cationic surfactant adsorption by swelling and nonswelling layer silicates Langmuir 11 2508–2514 10.1021/la00007a033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar