Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T09:03:15.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Textural and Isotopic Variations in Diagenetic Kaolinite from the Magnus Oilfield Sandstones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

C. I. Macaulay
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Applied Geology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ
A. E. Fallick
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Research and Reactor Centre, East Kilbride, Glasgow G75 OQU, Scotland
R. S. Haszeldine
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Applied Geology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ

Abstract

In Upper Jurassic sandstones of the Magnus Sandstone Member from the Magnus Oilfield in the North Sea, diagenetic kaolinite morphology and isotopic composition vary away from the Late Cimmerian unconformity. Near the unconformity, coarse-grained (15-30 μm) vermiform kaolinite morphology is most common, whereas downdip, 3 km away, fine-grained (∼10 μm) blocky morphology is prevalent. Kaolinite abundances increase downdip, away from the unconformity, and kaolinite near the unconformity has low δ18O (12·5-14·9%o smow) compared to that downdip (15·9−17·5%o). This reflects replacement of marine depositional pore-waters by meteoric water near the erosion surface. However, isotopic temperature estimates suggest that the majority of kaolinite formed at elevated burial temperatures of ~80°C, and not during subaerial exposure of the sandstone. The δD of kaolinite close to the unconformity is also lower than that downdip. Kaolinite morphology and isotopic composition record meteoric water ingress during Late Cimmerian subaerial erosion and retention of meteoric-derived water in the crest of the Magnus structure during burial diagenesis. Kaolinite formation during subaerial exposure is not of significance to the sandstone reservoir quality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnard, P.C. & Cooper, B.S. (1981) Oils and source rocks of the North Sea area. Pp. 169-175 in: Petroleum Geology of the Continental Shelf of North West Europe (L.V. Illing & G.D. Hobson, editors). Heyden & Son, London.Google Scholar
Bird, M.I. & Chivas, A.R. (1988) Stable isotope evidence for low temperature kaolinite weathering and post- formational hydrogen-isotope exchange in Permian kaolinites. Chem. Geol. (IGS) 72, 249265.Google Scholar
Bjørkum, P.A., Mjös, R., Walderhaug, O. & Hurst, A. (1990) The role of the late Cimmerian unconformity for the distribution of kaolinite in the Gullfaks Field, northern North Sea. Sedimentology 37, 395-106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjørlykke, K. (1983) Diagenetic reactions in sandstones. Pp. 169-214 in: NATO ASI Series C Mathematical and Physical Sciences (A. Parker & B.W. Sellwood, editors). 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjørlykke, K. & Brensdal, A. (1986) Diagenesis of the Brent Sandstone in the Statfjord Field, North Sea. Pp. 157—167 in: Roles of Organic Matter in Sediment Diagenesis (D.L. Gautier, editor). SEPM Spec. Publ. 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borthwick, J. & Harmon, R.S. (1982) A note regarding C1F3 as an alternative to BrF5 for oxygen isotope analysis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 46, 16651668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, R.N. & Mayeda, T.K. (1963) The use of bromine pentafluoride in the extraction of oxygen from oxides and silicates for isotopic analysis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 27, 4352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, H. (1961) Isotopic variations in meteoric waters. Science 133, 17021703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossey, L.J., Surdam, R.C. & Lahaan, R. (1986) Applications of organic/inorganic diagenesis to porosity prediction. Pp. 147-155 in: Roles of Organic Matter in Sediment Diagenesis (D.L. Gautier, editor). SEPM Spec. Publ. 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, C.D. (1983) Link between aluminium mobility and destruction of secondary porosity. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 67, 380384.Google Scholar
De’Ath, N.G. & Schuyleman, S.F. (1981) The geology of the Magnus Oilfield. Pp. 342-351 in: Petroleum Geology of the Continental Shelf of North West Europe (L.V. filing and, G.D. Hobson, editors). Heyden & Son, London.Google Scholar
Deegan, C.E. & Scull, B.J. (1977) A standard lithostratigraphic nomenclature for the central and northern North Sea. Inst. Geol. Sci., Report 77/25, 36pp.Google Scholar
Emery, D., Myers, K.J. & Young, R. (1990a) Ancient subaerial exposure and freshwater leaching in sandstones. Geology 18, 11781181.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery, D., Robinson, A.G., Smalley, P.C., Fallick, A.E. & Clayton, T. (1990b) Morphological and isotopic evidence for multiple kaolinite generation in Brent Group sandstones (Abs.). Geol. Soc. bond. Newslet. 19, 31.Google Scholar
Fallick, A.E., Jocelyn, J., Donnelly, T., Guy, M. & Behan, C. (1985) Origin of agates in volcanic rocks from Scotland. Nature 313, 672674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasmann, J.R., Lundegard, P.D., Clark, P.A., Penny, B.K. & Collins, I.D. (1989) Geochemical evidence for history of diagenesis and fluid migration; Brent sandstone, Heather Field, North Sea. Clay Miner. 24, 255284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, P.J., Fallick, A.E., Macintyre, R.M. & Elliot, S. (1987) Isotopic tracing of the provenance and diagenesis of Lower Brent Group Sandstones, North Sea. Pp. 939-949 in: Petroleum Geology of North West Europe (J. Brooks & K. Glennie, editors). Graham & Trotman, London.Google Scholar
Hancock, N.J. & Taylor, A.M. (1978) Clay mineral diagenesis and oil migration in the Middle Jurassic Brent Sand Formation. J. Geol. Soc. London. 135, 6972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haszeldine, R.S., Brint, J.F., Fallick, A.E., Hamilton, P.J. & Brown, S. (1992) Open and restricted hydrologies in Brent Group diagenesis: North Sea. Pp. 401—419 in: Geology of the Brent Group (A.C. Morton, R.S. Haszeldine, H.R. Giles & S. Brown, editors). Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. No. 61, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, M.J. & Boles, J.R. (1990) Volumetric relations between dissolved plagioclase and kaolinite in San Joaquin basin sandstones: Implications for aluminium mobility. Abs. Annual Conv. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., San Francisco.Google Scholar
Hogg, A.J.C. (1989) Petrographic and isotopic constraints on the diagenesis and reservoir properties of the Brent Group Sandstones, Alwyn South, northern UK North Sea. PhD thesis, Univ. Aberdeen, UK.Google Scholar
Hurst, A. & Irwin, H. (1982) Geological modelling of clay diagenesis in sandstones. Clay Miner. 17, 522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M.L. (1956) Soil Chemical Analyses—Advanced Course. Published by the author, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.L. (1979) Soil Chemical Analyses—Advanced Course, 2nd edition: Published by the author, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Jenkin, G.R.T. (1988) Stable isotope studies in the Caledonides of SW Connemara, Ireland. PhD thesis, Univ. Glasgow, UK.Google Scholar
Longstaffe, F.J. (1989) Stable isotopes as tracers in clastic diagenesis. Pp. 201-277 in: Burial Diagenesis (I.E. Hutcheon, editor). Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Series 15.Google Scholar
Longstaffe, F.J. & Ayalon, A. (1990) Hydrogen-isotope geochemistry of diagenetic clay minerals from Cretaceous sandstones, Alberta, Canada: evidence for exchange. Appl. Geochem. 5, 657668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundegard, P.D. & Land, L.S. (1986) Carbon dioxide and organic acids: their role in porosity enhancement and cementation, Paleogene of the Texas Gulf Coast. Pp. 129-146 in: Roles of Organic Matter in Sediment Diagenesis (D.L. Gautier, editor). SEPM Spec. Publ. No. 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, C.I., Haszeldine, R.S. & Fallick, A.E. (1992) Sedimentary basin pore waters remain stratified during 35 M.yr rapid subsidence: Magnus Oilfield, North Sea. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 76, 16251634.Google Scholar
Mehra, O.P. & Jackson, M.L. (1960) Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite-citrate system buffered by sodium bicarbonate: Clays Clay Miner. 7, 317327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, P.H. & Hurst, A. (1991) Application of back-scattered electron microscopy to the quantification of clay mineral microporosity in sandstone. J. Sed. Pet. 61, 921925.Google Scholar
Rainey, S.C.R. (1987) Sedimentology, diagenesis and geochemistry of the Magnus Sandstone Member, northern North Sea. PhD thesis, Univ. Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Savin, S.M. & Lee, M. (1988) Isotopic studies of phyllosilicates. Pp. 189-223 in: Hydrous Phyllosilicates (Exclusive of Micas) (S.W. Bailey, editor). Reviews in Mineralogy 19, Mineral. Soc. Am., Washington D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, M. (1991) The Magnus Field, Blocks 211/7a, 12a, UK North Sea. Pp. 153-157 in: United Kingdom Oil and Gas Fields (I.L. Abbots, editor). Geol. Soc. Memoir 14, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, S.M.F. (1986) Characterization and isotopic variations in natural waters. Pp. 165-183 in: Stable Isotopes in High Temperature Geological Processes (J.W. Valley, H.P. Taylor & J.R. O’Neil, editors). Reviews in Mineralogy 16, Miner. Soc. Am., Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, S.M.F. & Charef, A. (1986) Eau organique: caTacterisation isotopique et evidence de son role dans le gisement Pb-Zn de Fedj-ei-Adoum, Tunisie. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 19, 11891192.Google Scholar
Shock, E.L. (1988) Organic acid metastability in sedimentary basins. Geology 16, 886890.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, F. (1978) Diagenesis of Jurassic sandstones in the Viking Graben. J. Geol. Soc. bond. 135, 6367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoessell, R.K. (1987) Mass transport in sandstones around dissolving plagioclase grains. Geology 15, 295298.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surdam, R.C., Boese, S.W. & Crossey, L.J. (1984) The chemistry of secondary porosity. Pp. 127-150 in: Clastic Diagenesis (D.A. McDonald & R.C. Surdam, editors). Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Memoir 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welton, J.E. (1984) Chlorite. Pp. 46-47 in: SUM Petrology Atlas. Methods in Exploration Series, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar