Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:03:02.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structural factors affecting the crystal-chemical variability in Al-rich K-dioctahedral 2M1 micas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2019

Bella B. Zviagina Open the ORCID record for Bella B. Zviagina [Opens in a new window]  and
Victor A. Drits
Bella B. Zviagina*
Affiliation:
Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 7 Pyzhevsky per., 119017 Moscow, Russia
Victor A. Drits
Affiliation:
Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 7 Pyzhevsky per., 119017 Moscow, Russia
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To reveal the factors that determine the different ranges of compositional variations in high- and low-temperature Al-rich K-dioctahedral micas, relationships between structural parameters and cation composition were analysed for: (1) a series of synthetic 2M1 muscovite–phengite–aluminoceladonite samples; and (2) Al-rich, K-dioctahedral 2M1 micas with previously published refined structural data. The dependences of the unit-cell parameters on cation composition and the variations in tetrahedral and octahedral lateral dimensions and sheet thicknesses, interlayer distances and tetrahedral rotation angles were analysed and compared with those found previously for the series 1M trans-vacant (tv) illite–1M aluminoceladonite. The similarities in the variations of unit-cell parameters with cation composition observed in 2M1 and 1M natural and synthetic K-dioctahedral micas imply that these variations are controlled by similar – albeit not identical – structural factors. A major structural factor is the readjustment of the differently sized tetrahedral and octahedral sheets, which is realized in a different manner in micas formed under different pressure and temperature conditions.

Keywords

muscovitephengitealuminoceladonitecation compositionunit-cell parametersP–T formation conditions
Type
Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 169 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Martine Buatier

References

Bailey, S.W. (1984) Crystal chemistry of the true mica. Pp. 13–60 in: Micas (Bailey, S.W., editor), Reviews in Mineralogy, 13. Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Beyer, S.R., Kyser, K., Hiatt, E.E. & Fraser, I. (2010) Geological evolution and exploration geochemistry of the Boomerang Lake unconformity-type uranium prospect, Northwest Territories, Canada. Society of Economic Geologists, Special Publication, 15, 675–702.Google Scholar
Brigatti, M.F. & Guggenheim, S. (2002) Mica crystal chemistry and the influence of pressure, temperature and solid solution on atomistic models. Pp. 1–97 in: Micas: Crystal Chemistry and Metamorphic Petrology (Mottana, A., Sassi, F.E., Thompson, J.B. Jr & Guggenheim, S., editors). Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 46. Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, USA, with Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Brigatti, M.F., Frigieri, P. & Poppi, L. (1998) Crystal chemistry of Mg-, Fe2+-bearing muscovites-2M 1. American Mineralogist, 83, 775–785.Google Scholar
Brigatti, M.F., Galli, E., Medici, L., Poppi, L., Cibin, G., Marcelli, A. & Mottana, A. (2001) Chromium-containing muscovite: crystal chemistry and XANES spectroscopy. European Journal of Mineralogy, 13, 377–389.Google Scholar
Curetti, N., Ferraris, G. & Ivaldi, G. (2008) Correlation between crystallization pressure and structural parameters of phengites. American Mineralogist, 93, 451–455.Google Scholar
Domanik, K. & Holloway, J.R. (1996) The stability and composition of phengitic muscovite and associated phases from 5.5 to 11 GPa: implications for deeply subducted sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 60, 4133–4150.Google Scholar
Drits, V.A. & Kossovskaya, A.G. (1991) Clay Minerals: Micas and Chlorites. Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 175 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Drits, V.A., McCarty, D.K. & Zviagina, B.B. (2006) Crystal-chemical factors responsible for the distribution of octahedral cations over trans- and cis-sites in dioctahedral 2:1 layer silicates. Clays and Clay Minerals, 54, 131–153.Google Scholar
Drits, V.A., Zviagina, B.B., McCarty, D.K. & Salyn, A.L. (2010) Factors responsible for crystal-chemical variations in the solid solutions from illite to aluminoceladonite and from glauconite to celadonite. American Mineralogist, 95, 348–361.Google Scholar
Ferraris, G. and Ivaldi, G. (2002) Structural features of micas. Pp. 117–153 in: Micas: Crystal Chemistry and Metamorphic Petrology (Mottana, A., Sassi, F.E., Thompson, J.B. Jr & Guggenheim, S., editors). Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 46. Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, USA, with Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Guggenheim, S., Chang, Y.H. & van Groos A.F, Koster. (1987) Muscovite dehydroxylation: high-temperature studies. American Mineralogist, 72, 537–550.Google Scholar
Guidotti, C.V., Mazzoli, C., Sassi, F.P. & Blencoe, J.G. (1992) Compositional controls on the cell dimensions of 2M 1 muscovite and paragonite. European Journal of Mineralogy, 4, 283–297.Google Scholar
Güven, N. (1971) The crystal structures of 2M 1 phengite and 2M 1 muscovite. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 134, 196–212.Google Scholar
Ivaldi, G., Ferraris, G., Curetti, N. & Compagnoni, R. (2001) Coexisting 3T and 2M 1 polytypes in a phengite from Cima Pal (Val Savenca, western Alps): chemical and polytypic zoning and structural characterization. European Journal of Mineralogy, 13, 1025–1034.Google Scholar
Knurr, R.A. & Bailey, S.W. (1986) Refinement of Mn-substituted muscovite and phlogopite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 34, 7–16.Google Scholar
Massonne, H.J. & Schreyer, W. (1986) High-pressure syntheses and X-ray properties of white micas in the system K2O–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O. Neues Jahrbuch Mineralogie Abhandlungen, 153, 177–215.Google Scholar
Murao, R., Yubuta, K., Miyawaki, R. & Sugiyama, K. (2009) Analysis of aluminoceladonite included in green heulandite. JAKOKA: 2009 Annual Meeting of the Japan Association of Mineralogical Sciences, abs. R4-11, p. 105.Google Scholar
Pavese, A., Ferraris, G., Pischedda, V. & Ibberson, R. (1999) Tetrahedral order in phengite 2M 1 upon heating, from powder neutron diffraction, and thermodynamic consequences. European Journal of Mineralogy, 11, 309–320.Google Scholar
Pe-Piper, G. (1985) Dioctahedral micas in Triassic metavolcanic rocks of western Greece. Canadian Mineralogist, 23, 597–608.Google Scholar
Petrova, V.V. & Amarjargal, P. (1996) Zeolites of Mongolia. Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 150 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Radoslovich, E.W. & Norrish, K. (1962) The cell dimensions and symmetry of layer–lattice silicates. Some structural considerations. American Mineralogist, 47, 599–616.Google Scholar
Rasskazov, A.A. (1984) Clay Minerals of Potassium-Bearing Deposits (Area of Starobinsky Deposit). Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 72 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Rieder, M., Cavazzini, G., D'yakonov, Y.S., Frank-Kamenetskii, V.A., Gottardi, G., Guggenheim, S., Koval, P.V., Muller, G., Neiva, A.M.R., Radoslovich, E.W., Robert, J.-L., Sassi, F.P., Takeda, H., Weiss, Z. & Wones, D.R. (1998) Nomenclature of the micas. Clays and Clay Minerals, 46, 586–595.Google Scholar
Ripp, G.S., Doroshkevich, A.G., Karmanov, N.S. & Kanakin, S. V. (2009) Micas from the Khaluta carbonatite deposit, Western Transbaikal Region. Geology of Ore Deposits, 51, 812–821.Google Scholar
Rothbauer, R. (1971) Untersuchung eines 2M 1-muskovits mit neutronenstrahlen. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Monatshefte, 44, 143–154.Google Scholar
Rule, A.C. & Bailey, S.W. (1985) Refinement of the crystal structure of phengite-2M 1. Clays and Clay Minerals, 33, 403–409.Google Scholar
Sassi, F.P., Guidotti, C.V., Reider, M. & de Pieri, R. (1994) On the occurrence of metamorphic 2M1 phengite: some thoughts on polytypism and crystallization conditions of 3T phengites. European Journal of Mineralogy, 6, 171–178.Google Scholar
Sassi, R., Brigatti, M.F., Gomez-Pugnaire, M.T., Peruzzo, L., Tellini, F. & Sassi, F.P. (2010) What drives the distribution in nature of 3T vs. 2M1 polytype in muscovites and phengites? A general assessment based on new data from metamorphic and igneous granitoid rocks. American Mineralogist, 95, 1182–1191.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M.W., Dugnani, M. & Artioli, G. (2001) Synthesis and characterization of white micas in the join muscovite-aluminoceladonite. American Mineralogist, 86, 555–565.Google Scholar
Seifert, F. (1968) X-ray powder data for Mg-A1-celadonite (leucophyllite) from Barcza, Poland. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 19, 93–96.Google Scholar
Smoliar-Zviagina, B.B. (1993) Relationships between structural parameters and chemical composition of micas. Clay Minerals, 25, 603–624.Google Scholar
Smyth, J.R., Jacobsen, S.D., Swope, R.J., Angel, R.J., Arlt, T., Domanik, K. & Holloway, J.R. (2000) Crystal structures and compressibilities of synthetic 2M 1 and 3T phengite micas. European Journal of Mineralogy, 12, 955–963.Google Scholar
Sokolova, T.N., Drits, V.A., Sokolova, A.L. & Stepanov, S.S. (1976) Structural and mineralogical characteristics and conditions of formation of leucophyllite from salt-bearing deposits of Inder. Litologia i Poleznye Iskopaemye, 6, 80–95 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Środoń, J. & Eberl, D.D. (1984) Illite. Pp. 495–544 in: Micas (Bailey, S.W., editor). Reviews in Mineralogy, 13. Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Środoń, J., Paszkowski, M., Drygant, D., Anczkiewicz, A. & Banas, M. (2013) Thermal history of Lower Paleozoic rocks on the Peri-Tornquist margin of the East European Craton (Podolia, Ukraine) inferred from combined XRD, K-Ar, and AFT data. Clays and Clay Minerals, 61, 107–132.Google Scholar
Stöckert, B. (1985) Compositional control on the polymorphism (2M 1–3T) of phengitic white mica from high pressure parageneses of the Sesia Zone (lower Aosta valley, Western Alps; Italy). Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 89, 52–58.Google Scholar
Tsipursky, S.I. & Drits, V.A. (1977) Effectivity of the electronic method of intensity measurement in structural investigation by electron diffraction. Izvestija Akademii Nauk SSSR, Serija Fiziko-Matematicheskaja, 41, 2263–2271 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Velde, B. (1965) Phengite micas: synthesis, stability, and natural occurrence. American Journal of Science, 263, 886–913.Google Scholar
Vidal, O. & Parra, T. (2000) Exhumation paths of high-pressure metapelites obtained from local equilibria for chlorite–phengite assemblages. Geological Journal, 35, 139–161.Google Scholar
Wilson, M.D. (2013) Rock-Forming Minerals, Volume 3C, Sheet Silicates: Clay Minerals. The Geological Society, London, UK, 724 pp.Google Scholar
Zviagina, B.B. & Drits, V.A. (2012) Structural regularities in 2M 1 dioctahedral micas: the structure modeling approach. American Mineralogist, 97, 1939–1954.Google Scholar
Zviagina, B.B., Drits, V.A., Środoń, J., McCarty, D.K. & Dorzhieva, O.V. (2015) The illite–aluminoceladonite series: distinguishing features and identification criteria from X-ray diffraction and infrared spectroscopy data. Clays and Clay Minerals, 63, 378–394.Google Scholar
Zviagina, B.B., Drits, V.A., Sakharov, B.A., Ivanovskaya, T.A. & Dorzhieva, O.V. (2017) Crystal-chemical regularities and identification criteria in Fe-bearing, K-dioctahedral 1M micas from X-ray diffraction and infrared spectroscopy data. Clays and Clay Minerals, 65, 234–251.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Zviagina and Drits supplementary material

Zviagina and Drits supplementary material 1

Download Zviagina and Drits supplementary material(File)
File 26 KB