Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:11:20.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mineralogical characteristics and related surface charge fluctuations of some selected soils of temperate regions of northern Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

S. Mahboob Sharami ,
A. Forghani ,
A. Akbarzadeh  and
H. Ramezanpour
S. Mahboob Sharami
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, 41635-1314, Iran
A. Forghani
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, 41635-1314, Iran
A. Akbarzadeh*
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Water & Soil Engineering, University College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, 31587-77871, Iran
H. Ramezanpour
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, 41635-1314, Iran
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The majority of investigations of soil electrical characteristics are concerned with tropical and subtropical regions and hence there is little information about soils from other regions. The present study attempts to discover the most important constituents affecting soil electrical charge characteristics in a temperate zone. The study area is located on southern coastal zones of the Caspian Sea in northern Iran (Guilan province). The soil moisture and temperature regimes of the region determined by means of Newhall software were udic and thermic, respectively. Six representative pedons developed on granite, andesite, basalt, phyllite and limestone as their parent rocks are described and their physicochemical, mineralogical and electrical properties studied. The results indicate that the point of zero charge (PZC) values are small in all samples and smaller at the surface than in subsurface horizons. There is a positive correlation between pH0 (PZC) values, organic carbon percentage and crystalline Fe (Fed) content. The points of zero net charge (ZPNC) values are <2.5 in all the pedons studied, which refers to large amounts of negative charge in these soils. The results also show that the differences in negative charge development in a pH range from 2.5 to 6 were largest for horizons rich in organic C and least for those with significant amounts of layer silicate minerals. Therefore, the most important variable charge component in all of the soils studied is organic matter which controls the negative charge at the soil surface. The permanent charge (бp) of the soils studied is also large and negative, which agrees with the amount of clay and the mineralogy of these soils.

Keywords

surface charge characteristicspoint of zero chargepermanent chargevariable chargesoilsIran
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 327 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, W.A. & Kassim, J.K. (1983) The origin of vermiculite in soils developed from lower Palaeozoic sedimentary rocks in Mid—Wales. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 47, 316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anda, M., Suharta, N., Sulaeman, H. & Subagyo, H. (2001) Development and chemical properties of Ultisols in East Kalimantan as determined by charge characteristics. Agrivita, 23, 79–91.Google Scholar
Anda, M., Shamshuddin, J., Fauziah, C.I. & Syed Omar, S.R. (2008) Mineralogy and factors controlling charge development of three Oxisols developed from different parent materials. Geoderma, 143, 153–167.Google Scholar
Appel, C., Ma, L.Q., Rhue, R.D. & Kennelly, E. (2003) Point of zero charge determination in soils and minerals via traditional methods and detection of electroacoustic mobility. Geoderma, 113, 77–93.Google Scholar
Auxtero, E., Madeira, M. & Sousa, E. (2004) Variable charge characteristics of selected Andisols from the Azores, Portugal. Catena, 56, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baert, G. & Van Ranst, E. (1998) Exchange properties of highly weathered soils of the Lower Congo. Malaysian Journal of Soil Science, 2, 31-44.Google Scholar
Barale, M., Mansour, C., Carrette, F., Pavageau, E.M., Catalette, H., Lefevre, G., Fedoroff, M. & Cote, G. (2008) Characterization of the surface charge of oxide particles of PWR primary water circuits from 5 to 320°C. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 381, 302–308.Google Scholar
Batista-Gonzales, A.B., Hernandez, J.M., Fernandez, E. & Herbillon, A.J. (1982) Influence of silica content on the surface charge characteristics of allophanic clays. Clays and Clay Minerals, 30, 103–110.Google Scholar
Blume, H.P. & Schwertmann, U. (1969) Genetic evaluation of profile distribution of aluminum, iron and manganese oxsides. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 33, 438–444.Google Scholar
Campitelli, P.A., Velasco, M.I. & Ceppi, S.B. (2006) Chemical and physicochemical characteristics of humic acids extracted from compost, soil and amended soil. Talanta, 69, 1234–1239.Google Scholar
Chapman, H.D. (1965) Cation exchange capacity. Pp. 891–900 in: Methods of Soil Analysis (Black, C.A., editor). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
Chorover, J., Amistadi, M.K. & Chadwick, O.A. (2004) Surface charge evolution of mineral-organic complexes during pedogenesis in Hawaiian basalt. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Ada, 68, 4859–4876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, C.A. & Yong, R.N. (2006) Humic acid preparation, properties and interactions with metals lead and cadmium. Engineering Geology, 85, 26–32.Google Scholar
Duquette, M. & Hendershot, W. (1993a) Soil surface charge evaluation by back-titration. I. Theory and method development. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57, 1222–1228.Google Scholar
Duquette, M. & Hendershot, W. (1993b) Soil surface charge evaluation by back-titration. II. Application. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57, 1228–1234.Google Scholar
Duzegoren-Aydine, N.S. (2003) Comparative study of weathering signatures in felsie metamorphie rocks of Hong Kong. Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability, 14, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egli, M., Mirabella, A., Sartori, G. & Bonnaud, P. (2003) Weathering rates as a function of climate: result from climosequence of the Val Genova (Trentino, Italian Alps). Geoderma, 111, 99–121.Google Scholar
Frazier, C.S. & Graham, R.C. (2000) Pedogenic transformation of fractured granitic bedrock, Southern California. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64, 2057–2069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallez, A., Juo, A.S.R. & Herbillon, A.J. (1976) Surface and charge characteristics of selected soils in the tropics. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 40, 601–608.Google Scholar
Gee, G.W. & Bauder, J.W. (1986) Particle-size analysis. Pp. 383–411 in. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd edition (Klute, A. editor). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
Gillman, G.P. (1984) Using variable charge characteristics to understand the exchangeable cation status of oxic soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 22, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillman, G.P. (1985) Influence of organic matter and phosphate content on point of zero charge of variable charge component in oxide soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 23, 643–646.Google Scholar
Gillman, G.P. & Hallman, M.J. (1988) Measurement of exchange properties of Andisols by the compulsive exchange method. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 52, 1196–1198.Google Scholar
Gillman, G.P. & Sinclair, D. (1987) The grouping of soils with similar charge properties as a basis for agrotechnology transfer. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 25, 275–285.Google Scholar
Gillman, G.P. & Sumner, M.E. (1987) Surface charge characterization and soil solution composition of four soils from the Southern Piedmont in Georgia. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51, 589–594.Google Scholar
Gillman, G.P. & Sumpter, E.A. (1986) Surface charge characteristics and lime requirements of soils derived from basaltic, granitic, and metamorphie rocks in high-rainfall tropical Queensland. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 24, 173–192.Google Scholar
Gillman, G.P. & Uehara, G. (1980) Charge characteristics of soils with variable and permanent charge minerals: II. Experimental. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44, 252–255.Google Scholar
Guo, Z., Biscaye, P., Wei, L., Chen, X., Peng, S. & Liu, P. (2000) Summer monsoon variations over the last 1.2 Ma from the weathering of loess-soil sequences in China. Geophysical Research Letters, 27, 1751–1754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendershot, W.H. & Lavkulich, L.M. (1978) The use of zero point of charge (ZPC) to assess pedogenic development. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42, 468–472.Google Scholar
Hesami, R. (2005) Study the effect of leaching and migration of materials on soil developed of some forest land in Lahidjan region. MSc. thesis, Faculty of Agricultural Science, University of Guilan, Iran, (in Persian).Google Scholar
Hou, T., Xu, R., Tiwari, D. & Zhao, A. (2007) Interaction between electrical double layers of soil colloids and Fe/Al oxides in suspensions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 310, 670–674.Google Scholar
Hubbert, K.R., Graham, R.C. & Anderson, M.A. (2001) Soil and weathered bedrock: Components of Jeffrey Pine Plantation Substrate. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65, 1255–1262.Google Scholar
Islam, I.R., Peuraniemi, V., Aario, R. & Rojstaczer, S. (2002) Geochemistry and mineralogy of saprolite in Finnish Lapland. Applied Geochemistry, 17, 885–902.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.L. (1975) Soil Chemical Analysis. Advanced Course. University of Wisconsin, College of Agriculture, Department of Soils, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
Jersak, J., Amundson, R. & Brimhall, G. (1995) A mass balance analysis of podzolization: examples from northeastern United States. Geoderma, 66, 15–42.Google Scholar
Johns, W.D. & Grim, R.E. (1954) Quantitative estimation of clay minerals by diffraction methods. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 24, 242–251.Google Scholar
Jozefaciuk, G., Muranyi, A., Szatanik-Kloc, A., Farkas, C. & Gyuricza, C. (2001) Changes of surface, fine pore and variable charge properties of a brown forest soil under various tillage practices. Soil & Tillage Research, 59, 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jozefaciuk, G., Muranyi, A. & Alekseeva, T. (2002) Effect of extreme acid and alkali treatment on soil variable charge. Geoderma, 109, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juo, A.S.R. & Maduakor, H.O. (1974) Forms of pedogenetic distribution of extractable iron and aluminum in selected soils of Nigeria. Geoderma, 11, 167–189.Google Scholar
Khormali, F., Ayoubi, Sh., Kananro Foomani, F., Fatemi, A. & Hemmati, Kh. (2007) Tea yield and soil properties as affected by slope position and aspect in Lahijan area, Iran. International Journal of Plant Production, 1, 98–111.Google Scholar
Kittrick, J.A. & Hope, E.W. (1963) A procedure for the particle size separation of soils for X-ray diffraction analysis. Soil Science, 96, 312–325.Google Scholar
Li, J., Xu, R., Xiao, S. & Ji, G. (2005) Effect of lowmolecular-weight organic anions on exchangeable aluminum capacity of variable charge soils. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 284, 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. & Xu, R. (2008) Electrical double layers’ interaction between oppositely charged particles as related to surface charge density and ionic strength. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering Aspects, 326, 157–161.Google Scholar
McKeague, J.A. & Day, J.H. (1969) Oxalate-extractable Al as a criterion for identying podzol Bhorizon. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 49, 161–163.Google Scholar
Madeira, M., Auxtero, E. & Sousa, E. (2003) Cation and anion exchange properties of Andisols from the Azores, Portugal, as determined by the compulsive exchange and the ammonium acetate methods. Geoderma, 117, 225–241.Google Scholar
Marcano-Martinez, E. & McBride, M.B. (1989) Comparison of the titration and ion adsorption methods for surface charge measurement in Oxisols. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 53, 1040–1045.Google Scholar
Mehra, O.P. & Jackson, M.L. (1960) Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite citrate system with sodium bicarbonate. Clays and Clay Minerals, 7, 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naidu, R., Morrison, R.J., Janik, L. & Asghar, M. (1997) Clay mineralogy and surface charge characteristics of basaltic soils from Western Samoa. Clay Minerals, 32, 545–556.Google Scholar
Nelson, D.W. & Sommers, L.E. (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Pp. 539–580 in. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 11, 2 nd edition (Page, A.L., Miller, R.H. & Keeney, D.R., editors) American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
Ogunsola, O.A., Omueti, A.J.A., Olade, O. & Udo, E.J. (1989) Free oxide status and distribution in soils overlying limestone areas in Nigeria. Soil Science, 147, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, N. & Richter, D.D. (2005) Elemental translocation and losses from three highly weathered soil-bedrock profiles in the southeastern United States. Geoderma, 126, 5–25.Google Scholar
Ortize, I., Simón, M., Dorronsoro, C., Martín, F. & Garcia, I. (2002) Soil evolution over the Quaternary period in a Mediterranian climate (SE Spain). Catena, 48, 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, A.L. (1986) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Soil Science Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Patino, L.C., Velbel, M.A., Price, J.R. & Wade, J.A. (2003) Trace element mobility during spheroidal weathering of basalts and adesite in Hawaii and Guatemala. Chemical Geology, 202, 343–464.Google Scholar
Qafoku, N.P., Sumner, M.E. & West, L.T. (2000) Mineralogy and chemistry of some variable charge subsoils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 31, 1051–1070.Google Scholar
Singer, A. (1977) Extractable sesquioxides in six Mediterranean soils developed on basalt and scoria. Journal of Soil Science, 28, 125–135.Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff. (2006) Keys to Soil Taxonomy. USDA, Washington, D.C. 10th NRCS.Google Scholar
Sposito, G. (1989) The Chemistry of Soils. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Stonehouse, H.B. & Arnaud, R.J.St. (1971) Distribution of Iron, clay and extractable iron and aluminum in some Saskatchewan soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 51, 283–292.Google Scholar
Taubasoa, C., Dos Santos Afonso, M. & Torres Sanchez, R.M. (2004) Modelling soil surface charge density using mineral composition. Geoderma, 121, 123–133.Google Scholar
Tributh, H., Boguslawski, E.V., Lieres, A.V., Steffens, D. & Mengel, K. (1987) Effect of potassium removal by crops on transformation of illitic clay minerals. Soil Science, 143, 404–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uehara, G. & Gillman, G.P. (1980) Charge characteristics of soils with variable and permanent charge minerals: I. Theory. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44, 250–252.Google Scholar
Uehara, G. & Gillman, G.P. (1981) The Mineralogy, Chemistry and Physics of Tropical Soils with Variable Charge Clays. West View Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
Van Ranst, E., Shamshuddin, J., Baert, G. & Dzwowa, G. (1998) Charge characteristics in relation to free iron and organic matter of soils from Bambouto Mountains, Western Cameroon. European Journal of Soil Science, 49, 243–252.Google Scholar
Wilson, M.J. (1999). The origin and formation of clay minerals in soils: past, present and future perspectives. Clay Minerals, 34, 7–25.Google Scholar
Xu, Z., Zhao, A. & Ji, G. (2003) Effect of low-molecular-weight organic anions on surface charge of variable charge soils. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 264, 322–326.Google Scholar
Yu, T.R. (1997) Chemistry of Variable Charge Soils. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, X.N., Zhang, G.Y., Zhao, A.Z. & Yu, T.R. (1989) Surface electrochemical properties of the B horizon of a Rhodic Ferralsol, China. Geoderma, 44, 275–286.Google Scholar