Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:12:35.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methodology for studying the composition of non-interlamellar pore water in compacted bentonite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Joonas Järvinen ,
Michał Matusewicz  and
Aku Itälä
Joonas Järvinen*
Affiliation:
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, FINLAND
Michał Matusewicz
Affiliation:
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, FINLAND
Aku Itälä
Affiliation:
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, FINLAND
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many safety functions required of the compacted bentonite buffer in the KBS-3 concept rely on processes influenced by the composition of the pore water. Important safety-relevant processes are related to the bentonite buffer, e.g. swelling, precipitation and dissolution reactions, and transport of water, colloids and ions. One of the methods used in analysing pore water in compacted bentonite is the ‘squeezing technique’. Various possible artefacts which can occur during squeezing, such as mixing of different pore-water types, dissolution of accessory minerals and cation exchange, need special attention.

The present work describes the methodology for studying the composition of the non-interlamellar pore water by combining squeezing methods, chemical analyses, microstructure measurements and geochemical modelling. Four different maximum pressures were used to squeeze the compacted bentonite pore water. The origin of the pore water was studied by analysing the bentonite microstructure both before and after squeezing using SAXS and NMR, the cation exchange and dissolution reactions were studied by chemical analyses and geochemical modelling.

The pore-water yield increased from 32 to 48 wt.% from the initial amount of porewater in the samples when the maximum squeezing pressure was increased from 60 MPa to 120 MPa. About 35 wt.% of the water collected originated from the interlamellar (IL) pores. The ratio between IL and non-IL pore waters as well as the composition of the squeezed porewater was constant in the squeezing-pressure range used. The results of microstructural measurements by SAXS were in perfect agreement with previous studies (e.g. Muurinen & Carlsson, 2013). The dissolving accessory minerals have an effect on the ratio of the cations in the squeezed solution while the migration of anions in bentonite seems to be diffusion limited. According to geochemical modelling the chloride concentration of the non-IL pore water in compacted bentonite before squeezing was 0.34 Mgreater than in the squeezed pore water due to the mixing of two main water types.

Keywords

bentonitepore watersqueezingmicrostructure
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 173 - 187
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2016 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2016

References

Amman, L., Bergaya, F. & Lagaly, G. (2005) Determination of the cation exchange capacity of clays with copper complexes revisited. Clay Minerals, 40, 441–453.10.1180/0009855054040182Google Scholar
Blanc, P., Lassin, A. & Piantone, P. (2007) THERMODDEM - A database devoted to waste minerals: (http://thermoddem.brgm.fr).Google Scholar
Bolt, G.H. & Warkentin, B.P. (1958) The negative adsorption of anions by clay suspensions. Kolloid-Zeitschrift, 156, 41–46.10.1007/BF01812361Google Scholar
Bradbury, M.H. & Baeyens, B. (2002) Pore water chemistry in compacted re-saturated MX-80 bentonite: Physico-chemical characterisation and geochemical modelling. Paul Scherrer Institut Berich Nr. 02-10, Villigen, Switzerland, 42 pp.Google Scholar
Fernández, A.M., Baeyens, B., Bradbury, M. & Rivas, P. (2004) Analysis of the pore water chemical composition of a Spanish compacted bentonite used in an engineered barrier. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 29, 105–118.10.1016/j.pce.2003.12.001Google Scholar
Fernández, A.M., Sanchez-Ledesma, D.M., Tournassat, C., Melon, A., Gaucher, E.C., Astudillo I & Vinsot, A. (2014) Applying the squeezing technique to highly consolidated clayrocks for pore water characterization: Lessons learned from experiments at the Mont Terri Rock Laboratory. Applied Geochemistry, 49, 2–21.10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.07.003Google Scholar
Fernández, A.M., Wilhelm, S., Wouters, L. & Van Baelen, H. (2015) Characterizing clay pore water composition of Ypresian clays from Doel and Kallo sites, Belgium. 6th meeting on “Clays in Natural & EngineeredBarriers for Radioactive Waste Confinement”. Book of Abstracts, pp. 202-203.Google Scholar
Gran, G. (1950) Determination of the equivalence point in potentiometric titration. Acta Chemica Scandinavica, 4, 559–577.10.3891/acta.chem.scand.04-0559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmboe, M., Wold, S. & Jonsson, M. (2012) Porosity investigation of compacted bentonite using XRD profile modelling. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 128, 19–32.10.1016/j.jconhyd.2011.10.005Google Scholar
Mia, A., Jarvinen, L. & Muurinen, A. (2013) CO2 effect on the pH of compacted bentonite buffer on the laboratory scale. Clay Minerals, 48, 149–152.Google Scholar
Karnland, O., Olsson, S. & Nilsson, U. (2006) Mineralogy and sealing properties of various bentonites and smectite-rich clay minerals. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management, Stockholm, Sweden, SKB Technical Report TR-06-30.Google Scholar
Kiviranta, L. & Kumpulainen, S. (2011) Quality control and characterization of bentonite materials. Posiva Oy, Olkiluoto, Finland, Working Report 2011-84.Google Scholar
Kumpulainen, S. & Kiviranta, L. (2010) Mineralogical and chemical characterization of various bentonite and smectite-rich clay materials. Part A. Comparison and development of mineralogical characterization methods Part B: Mineralogical and chemical characterization of clay materials. Posiva Oy, Olkiluoto, Finland, Working Report 2010-52, 74 p.Google Scholar
Kumpulainen, S. & Kiviranta, L. (2011) Mineralogical, Chemical and Physical Study of Potential Buffer and Backfill Materials from ABM Test Package 1. Posiva Oy, Olkiluoto, Finland, Working Report 2011-41.Google Scholar
Matusewicz, M., Liljeström, V., Pirkkalainen, P., Suurinen, J.P., Root, A., Muurinen, A., Serimaa, R. & Olin, M. (2013) Micro structural investigation of calcium mont-morillonite. Clay Minerals, 48, 267–276.10.1180/claymin.2013.048.2.08Google Scholar
Meier, L.P. & Kahr, G. (1999) Determination of the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of clay minerals using the complexes of copper(II) ion with triethylenetetramine and tetraethylenepentamine. Clays and Clay Minerals, 47, 386–388.10.1346/CCMN.1999.0470315Google Scholar
Muurinen, A. (2001) Development and testing of analysis methods for bentonite pore water. Posiva Oy, Olkiluoto, Finland, Working Report 2001-07.Google Scholar
Muurinen, A. (2006) Ion concentration caused by an external solution into the porewater of compacted bentonite. Posiva Oy, Olkiluoto, Finland, Working Report 2006-96.Google Scholar
Muurinen, A. (2009) Studies on the chemical conditions and microstructure in the reference bentonites of alternative buffer materials project (ABM) in Äspö. Posiva Oy, Olkiluoto, Finland. Working Report 2009-42.Google Scholar
Muurinen, A. (2010) Studies on the chemical conditions and microstructure in package 1 of alternative buffer materials project (ABM) in Äspö. Posiva Oy, Olkiluoto, Finland. Working Report 2010-11.Google Scholar
Muurinen, A. & Carlsson, T. (2013) Bentonite pore structure based on SAXS, chloride exclusion and NMR studies. Posiva Oy, Olkiluoto, Finland. Working Report 2013-53.Google Scholar
Muurinen, A. & Järvinen, J. (2013) Ion-selective electrodes in pore water chemistry measurement of compacted bentonite. Posiva Oy, Olkiluoto, Finland. Working Report 2013-24.Google Scholar
Muurinen, A. & Lehikoinen, J. (1999) Pore water chemistry in compacted bentonite. Posiva Oy, Olkiluoto, Finland, Working report 1999-20.Google Scholar
Muurinen, A., Karnland, O. & Lehikoinen, J. (2007) Effect of homogenization on the micro structure and exclusion of chloride in compacted bentonite. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 32, 485–490.10.1016/j.pce.2006.02.058Google Scholar
Ohkubo, T., Kikuchi, H. & Yamaguchi, M. (2008) An approach of NMR relaxometry for understanding water in saturated compacted bentonite. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 33, S169-S176.Google Scholar
Parkhurst, D.L. & Appelo, C.A.J. (2013) Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3 - A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 6, chapter A43, 497 pp. (http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/06/a43/) Google Scholar
Posiva (2010) Nuclear Waste Management at Olkiluoto and Loviisa Power Plants: Review of Current Status and Future Plans for 2010-2012. TKS-2009, Posiva OY, Eurajoki.Google Scholar
Pusch, R., Muurinen, A., Lehikoinen, J., Bors, J. & Eriksen, T. (1999) Microstructural and chemical parameters of bentonite as determinants of waste isolation efficiency. European Commission. Nuclear Science and Technology. Project Report EUR 18950 EN.Google Scholar
Sacchi, E., Michelot, J.-L., Pitsch, H., Lalieux, P. & Aranyossy, J. (2001) Extraction of water and solutes from argillaceous rocks for geochemical characterisation: Methods, processes and current understanding. Hydrogeology Journal, 9, 17–33.10.1007/s100400000113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SKB (2011) Long-term safety for the final repository for spent nuclear fuel at Forsmark. TR-11—01, Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Sposito, G., Holtzclaw, K.M., Charlet, L., Jouany, C. & Page, A.L. (1983) Sodium-calcium and sodium-magnesium exchange on Wyoming bentonite in perchlorate and chloride media. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 47, 51–56.10.2136/sssaj1983.03615995004700010010xGoogle Scholar
Svensson, D., Duek, A., Nilsson, U., Olsson, S., Sandén, T., Lydmark, S., Jägerwall, S., Pedersen, K. & Hansen, S. (2011) Alternative buffer material. Status of the ongoing laboratory investigation of reference materials and test package 1. SKB, TR-11-06.Google Scholar
Van Loon, L.R., Glaus, M.A. & Muller, W. (2007) Anion exclusion effects in compacted bentonites: Towards a better understanding of anion diffusion. Applied Geochemistry, 22, 2536–2552.10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.07.008Google Scholar
Wersin, P. (2003) Geochemical modelling of bentonite pore water in high-level water repositories. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 61, 405–22.10.1016/S0169-7722(02)00119-5Google Scholar