Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T06:58:09.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mathematical modelling of the sorption dynamics of radionuclides by natural clinoptilolite in permeable reactive barriers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

V. A. Nikashina ,
I. B. Serova ,
E. M. Kats ,
N. A. Tikhonov ,
M. G. Tokmachev  and
P. G. Novgorodov
V. A. Nikashina*
Affiliation:
Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kosygin str. 19, Moscow 119991, Russia
I. B. Serova
Affiliation:
Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kosygin str. 19, Moscow 119991, Russia
E. M. Kats
Affiliation:
Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kosygin str. 19, Moscow 119991, Russia
N. A. Tikhonov
Affiliation:
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Physics, Moscow, Russia
M. G. Tokmachev
Affiliation:
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Physics, Moscow, Russia
P. G. Novgorodov
Affiliation:
Institute of Oil and Gas Problems, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Yakutsk, Russia
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The anthropogenic accidents in the world (including the underground emergency nuclear explosion at the site “Kraton-3” (Yakutiya) and also the recent Fukushima accident) resulted in significant environmental pollution by radionuclides, mainly long-lived 90Sr and 137Cs. One of the ways to solve this problem is the creation of “permeable reactive barriers” (PRBs). High selectivity of clinoptilolite-containing tuffs (CLT) towards Sr2+ and Cs+ radionuclides, together with their availability and reasonable cost, make possible their use as PRBs. The scales of the ion-exchange processes taking place on PRBs indicate the necessity of mathematical modelling. In this connection, Sr2+ and Cs+ ion-exchange sorption on Khonguruu CLT (Yakutiya) from solutions of various mineralizations was studied under equilibrium and non-equilibrium conditions. The physicochemical and mathematical models of the dynamic ion-exchange process and also the computer program considering both structural features of CLT (two-stage particle diffusion kinetics) and possible periodic interruptions of the process were developed. The breakthrough time of CLT as a geochemical barrier was calculated by such mathematical modelling.

Keywords

environmental pollutionradioactive pollutionKraton-3Yakutiyaradionuclideszeoliteclinoptilolite-containing tuffselectivityion exchangemathematical modellingpermeable reactive barriertwo-stage particle diffusionkineticsbreakthrough timecomputer program
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 233 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Deceased 2009

References

Brown, L.M., Sherry, H.S. & Krambek FJ. (1971) Mechanism and kinetics of isotopic exchange in zeolites. Theory. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 75, 3846–3855.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, M., Aloysius, D. & Zhou, H. (1995) Permeable subsurface sorbent barrier for 90Sr: Laboratory studies of natural and synthetic materials. Waste Management, 15, 7, 485-493Google Scholar
Inglezakis, V.J. & Grigoropoulou, H.P. (2003) Modeling of ion exchange of Pb2+ in fixed beds of clinoptilolite. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 61, 273–282.Google Scholar
Manual N24 (1993) Cation-exchange capacity determination of zeolite-containing rock by absorbed ammonium. Russian State Geology Committee, Novosibirsk, 18 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Markovska, L.T., Meshko, V.D. & Marinkovski, M.S. (2006) Modeling of the adsorption kinetics of zinc onto granular activated carbon and natural zeolite. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 71, 957–967.Google Scholar
Nikashina, V.A. & Zaitseva, E.V. (1991) Modeling and calculation of the ion-exchange processes of excess strontium removal by Tedzami clinoptilolite from underground drinking water. Program and Abstracts, Zeolites ‘91, 3rd International Conference on the Occurrence, Properties and Utilization of Natural Zeolites, Havana, Cuba, 1991, 169-170.Google Scholar
Nikashina, V.A., Galkina, N.K. & Senyavin, M.M. (1977) The calculating of the sorption of metals by ionexchange filters, Russian Institute of Scientific and Technical Information, Moscow, Article no. 3668, 44 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Nikashina, V.A., Senyavin, M.M., Mironova, L.I. & Tyurina, V.A. (1986) Modeling and calculating iion-exchange processes of metal sorption by natural clinoptilolite. Pp. 283–288 in: New Developments in Zeolite Science Technology, Proceedings of the 7th International Zeolite Conference (Murakami, Y., Iijima, A. & Ward, J.W., editors) Tokyo, Japan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikashina, V.A., Galkina, N.K., Komarova, I.V., Anfilov, B.G. & Argin, M.A. (1995) Evaluation of clinoptilolite- rich tuffs as ion-exchangers. Pp. 289–297 in: Natural Zeolites ‘93: Occurence, Properties, Use (Ming, D.W. & Mumpton, F.A., editors) Brockport, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Park, J., Lee, S., Lee, J. & Lee, C. (2002) Lab scale experiments for permeable reactive barriers against contaminated groundwater with ammonium and heavy metals using clinoptilolite (01-29B). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 95, 65–79.Google Scholar
Rabideau, A.J., Van Benschoten, J., Patel, A. & Bandilla, K. (2005) Performance assessment of zeolite treatment wall for removing Sr-90 from groundwater. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 79, 1–24.Google Scholar
Senyavin, M.M., Rubinstein, R.N., Venitsianov, E.V., Galkina, N.K., Komarova, I.V. & Nikashina, V.A. (1972) Fundamentals of Calculation and Optimization of Ion-Exchange Processes. Moscow, Nauka, 172 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Thompson, P.W. & Tassopulos, M.A. (1986) Phenomena logical interpretation of two-step uptake behaviour by zeolites. Zeolites, 6, 12–20.Google Scholar
Tikhonov, A.N. & Arsenin, V.J. (1979) Methods of Inverse Problem Solving. Moscow, Nauka, 288 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
USEPA (1998) Permeable Reactive Barrier Technologies for Contaminant Remediation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 600R98125.Google Scholar
Venitsianov, E.V. & Rubinstein, R.N. (1983) Dynamics of Sorption from Liquids (Senyavin, M.M., editor). Nauka, Moscow, 240 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Wantanaphong, J., Moony, S.J. & Bailey, E.H. (2005) Natural and waste materials as metal sorbents in permeable reactive barriers (PRBs). Environmental Chemistry Letters, 3, 19–23.Google Scholar
Warchol, J. & Petrus, R. (2006) Modeling of heavy metal removal dynamics in clinoptilolite packed beds. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 93, 29–39.Google Scholar
Woinarski, A.Z., Snape, I., Stevens, G.W. & Stark, S.C. (2003) The effects of cold temperature on copper ion exchange by natural zeolite for use in a permeable reactive barrier in Antarctica. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 37, 159–168.Google Scholar
Woinarski, A.Z., Stevens, G.W. & Snape, I. (2006; A natural zeolite permeable reactive barrier to treat heavy-metal contaminated waters in Antarctica: kinetic and fixed-bed studies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 84, 109–116.Google Scholar