Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:22:06.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of exchange cation and layer charge on the isomerization of α-pinene over SWy-2, SAz-1 and Sap-Ca

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

C. Breen  and
A. J. Moronta
C. Breen*
Affiliation:
Materials Research Institute, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
A. J. Moronta
Affiliation:
Materials Research Institute, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

SWy-2 (Wyoming), Sap-Ca saponite (California) and SAz-1 (Cheto, Arizona) were exchanged with different cations (Al, Ni, Mg, Ca and Na). The catalytic activity of these ionexchanged clays was measured directly using the isomerization of α-pinene at 80°C for 2 h to yield camphene, limonene and other minor products. The order of activity for the different cationexchanged forms was Al > Ni > Mg > Ca > Na, which correlated well with the known polarizing power of these cations and the resulting interlayer acidity. Catalysts derived from Sap-Ca were the most active followed by SWy-2, with SAz-1 the least active by a considerable margin. The greater activity of Sap-Ca over SWy-2 was attributed to the high tetrahedral charge in the former. Reduction of the layer charge of SAz-1 using Li fixation caused a significant improvement in the catalytic activity of the Al-exchanged reduced-charge SAz-1.

Keywords

α-pineneion-exchanged claysexchangeable cationscatalysis
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 467 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Current address: Centro de Superficies y Catálisis, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad del Zulia, P.O. Box 15251, Maracaibo 4003A, Venezuela

References

Ballantine, J.A., Davies, M., O'Neil, R.M., Patel, I., Purnell, H., Rayankorn, M. & Williams, K.J. (1984) Organic reactions catalysed by sheet silicates: Ester production by the direct addition of carboxylic acids to alkenes. J. Mol. Catal. 26, 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, S.A. & Jaynes, W.F. (1994) Role of the layer charge in organic contaminant sorption by organoclays. Pp. 48–77 in. Layer Charge Characteristics of 2:2 Silicate Clay Minerals (Mermut, A.R., editor). CMS Workshop Lectures, 6. Clay Minerals Society, Boulder, CO, USA.Google Scholar
Breen, C. & Moronta, A.J. (1999) Influence of layer charge on the catalytic activity of mildly acidactivated tetramethylammonium-exchanged bentonites. J. Phys. Chem. B, 103, 5675–5680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, C. & Moronta, A.J. (2000) Characterisation and catalytic activity of aluminum- and aluminum/ tetramethylammonium-exchang ed bentonites. J. Phys. Chem. B, 104, 2702–2708.Google Scholar
Breen, C. & Watson, R. (1998) Acid-activated organoclays: preparation, characterisation and catalytic activity of polycation-treated bentonites. Appl. Clay Sci. 12, 479–494.Google Scholar
Breen, C., Watson, R., Madejová, J., Komadel, P. & Klapyta, Z. (1997) Acid-activated organoclays: Preparation, characterisation and catalytic activity of acid-treated tetramethylammonium-exchan ged smectites. Langmuir, 13, 6473–6479.Google Scholar
Brown, D.R. & Rhodes, C.N. (1997) Br€ nsted and Lewis acid catalysis with ion-exchanged clays. Catal. Lett. 45, 35–40.Google Scholar
Chiche, B., Finiels, A., Gauthier, C. Geneste, P., Graille, J. & Pioch, D. (1987) Acylation over cation-exchanged montmorillonite. J. Mol. Catal. 42, 229–235.Google Scholar
Clementz, D.M. & Mortland, M.M. (1974) Properties of reduced charge montmorillonite: Tetra-alkylammonium ion exchange forms. Clays Clay Miner. 22, 223–229.Google Scholar
De Stefanis, A., Perez, G., Ursini, O. & Tomlinson, A.A.G. (1995) PLS versus zeolites as sorbents and catalysts. II. Terpene conversions in alumina-pillared clays and phosphates and medium pore zeolites. Appl. Catal. 132, 353–365.Google Scholar
Gregory, R., Smith, D.J.H. & Westlake, D.J. (1983) The production of ethyl acetate from ethylene and acetic acid using clay catalysts. Clay Miner. 18, 431–435.Google Scholar
Janek, M. & Komadel, P. (1993) Autotransformation of H-smectites in aqueous solution. The effect of octahedral iron content. Geol. Carpath. Ser. Clays, 44, 59–64.Google Scholar
Jaynes, W.F. & Bigham, J.M. (1987) Charge reduction, octahedral charge, and lithium retention in heated, Li-saturated smectites. Clays Clay Miner. 35, 440–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaviratna, H. & Pinnavaia, T.J. (1994) Acid hydrolysis of octahedral Mg2+ sites in 2:1 layered silicates: An assessment of edge attack and gallery access mechanisms. Clays Clay Miner. 42, 717–723.Google Scholar
Kukkadapu, R.K. & Boyd, S.A. (1995) Tetramethylphosphonium- and tetramethylammonium-smectites as adsorbents of aromatic and chlorinated hydrocarbons: Effect of water on adsorption efficiency. Clays Clay Miner. 43, 318–323.Google Scholar
Lee, J.F., Mortland, M.M. & Boyd, S.A. (1989) Shapeselective adsorption of aromatic molecules from water by tetramethylammonium-smectit. . J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 85, 2953–2962.Google Scholar
Mendioroz, S. & Pajares, J.A. (1987) Texture evolution of montmorillonite under progressive acid treatment: Change from H3 to H2 type of hysteresis. Langmuir, 3, 676–681.Google Scholar
Mokaya, R. & Jones, W. (1995) Pillared clays and pillared acid-activated clays: A comparative study of physical, acidity, and catalytic properties. J. Catal. 153, 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortland, M.M. & Raman, K.V. (1968) Surface acidity of smectites in relation to hydration, exchangeable cation and structure. Clays Clay Miner. 16, 393–398.Google Scholar
Novak, I. & Čičel, B. (1978) Dissolution of smectites in hydrochloric acid: II. Dissolution rate as a function of crystallochemical decomposition. Clays Clay Miner. 26, 341–344.Google Scholar
Nzengung, V.A., Voudrias, E.A., Nkedi-Kizza, P., Wampler, J.M. & Weaver, C.E. (1996) Organic cosolvent effects on sorption equilibrium of hydrophobic organic chemicals by organoclays. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30, 89–96.Google Scholar
Pinnavaia, T.J., Tzou, M.S., Landau, S.D. & Raythatha, R.H. (1984) On the pillaring and delamination of smectite clay catalysts by polyoxo cations of auminum. J. Mol. Catal. 27, 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purnell, J.H., Thomas, J.M., Diddams, P., Ballantine, J.A. & Jones, W. (1989) The influence of exchangeable aluminium ion concentration and of layer charge on the catalytic activity of montmorillonite clays. Catal. Lett. 2, 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, C.N. & Brown, D.R (1994) Catalytic activity of acid-treated montmorillonite in polar and non-polar reaction media. Catal. Lett. 24, 285–291.Google Scholar
Taylor, D.R. & Jenkins, D.B. (1986) Acid-activated clays. Soc. Min. Eng. AIME Trans. 282, 1901–1910.Google Scholar
Tennakoon, D.T.B., Schlögl, R., Rayment, T., Klinowski, J., Jones, W. & Thomas, J.M. (1983) The characterization of clay-organic systems. Clay Miner. 18, 357–371.Google Scholar
Vaccari, A. (1998) Preparation and catalytic properties of cationic and anionic clays. Catal. Today, 41, 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicente, M.A., Suárez, M., López-González, J.D. & Bañares-Muñoz, M.A. (1996) Characterization, surface area, and porosity analyses of the solids obtained by acid leaching of a saponite. Langmuir, 12, 566–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, J.Q., Zhou, P. & Xiao, S.D. (1995) Highly selective hydration reaction of α-pinene over H-mordenites prepared with quaternary ammonium-salts. Chin. J. Chem. 13, 280–283.Google Scholar