Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:36:13.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hydration and strength evolution of air-cured zeolite-rich tuffs and siltstone blended cement pastes at low water-to-binder ratio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

M.H. Cornejo ,
J. Elsen ,
C. Paredes  and
H. Baykara
M.H. Cornejo*
Affiliation:
Center of Research in Nanotechnology (CIDNA), Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (ESPOL), Guayaquil, Ecuador
J. Elsen
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
C. Paredes
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Production Science, Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (ESPOL), Guayaquil, Ecuador
H. Baykara
Affiliation:
Science and Art Faculty, Chemistry Department, Siirt University, Siirt, Turkey
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This contribution is the second part of an in-depth study on the hydration and strength evolution of blended cement pastes at a water to binder (W/B) ratio of 0.3, cured by two different methods. The blended cement pastes showed significant hydration up to 7 days, when almost all of the hydration products had already formed; thereafter, carbonation played an important role up to, and possibly beyond, 91 days. Likewise, the hydration of alite (tricalcium silicate, Ca3SiO5, C3S) proceeded up to 14 days and then started to slow down. However, the hydration of belite (dicalcium silicate, Ca2SiO4, C2S) was affected most strongly, as it nearly ceased, under the air-curing conditions. During hydration, some of the blended cement pastes had a larger calcium hydroxide (CH) content than the unblended (plain) ones. The accelerating effects of the addition of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), the air-curing conditions and the low W/B ratio may explain these unusual results. Under these experimental conditions, the water incorporated into hydrates was about 50% of the total amount of water used during full hydration of the cement pastes. The pozzolanic reaction predominated during the early ages, but disappeared as time passed. In contrast, the carbonation reaction increased by consuming ∼45% of the total amount of CH produced after aging for 91 days. Only one blended cement paste reached the compressive strength of the plain cements. The blended cement pastes containing 5% of the zeolitic tuffs, Zeo1 or Zeo2, or 10% of the calcareous siltstone, Limo, developed the greatest compressive strength under the experimental conditions used in this study.

Keywords

pozzolanic reactionnatural zeolitesair curingquantitative X-ray diffraction
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 133 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmadi, B. & Shekarchi, M. (2010) Use of natural zeolite as a supplementary cementitious material. Cement and Concrete Composites, 32, 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Amoudi, O., Al-Kutti, W., Ahmadi, B. & Maslehuddin, M. (2009) Correlation between compressive strength and certain durability indices of plain and blended cement concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 31, 672–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atis, C.D. (2004) Carbonation-porosity-strength model for fly ash concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 16, 91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASTM C109/C109M-13 (2013) Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.Google Scholar
Bentz, D., Snyder, K. & Strutzman, P. (1997) Hydration of Portland cement: The effects of curing. 10th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, Vol. 2. (H. Justnes, editor), Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
Bjornström, J., Martinelli, A., Matic, A., Börjesson, L. & Panas, I. (2004) Accelerating effects of colloidal nano-silica for beneficial calcium-silicate-hydrate formation in cement. Chemical Physics Letters 392, 242–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, P., Costa, J., Milestone, N. & Lynsdale, C. (2010) Carbonation of CH and CSH in composite cement pastes containing high amounts of BFS. Cement & Concrete Research, 40, 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouasker, M., Mounanga, P., Turcry, P. & Loukili, A. (2008) Chemical shrinkage of cement pastes and mortar at very early age: Effect of limestone filler and granular inclusion. Cement & Concrete Composites, 30, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwers, H. (2004) The work of Powers and Brownyard revisited: Part 1. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 1697–1716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwers, H. (2005) The work of Powers and Brownyard revisited: Part 2. Cement and Concrete Research, 35, 1922–1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canpolat, F., Yilmaz, K., Köse, M. & Sümer, M. (2004) Use of zeolite, coal bottom ash and fly ash as replacement materials in cement production. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 731–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colella, C., De Gennaro, M. & Aiello, R. (2001) Use of zeolitic tuff in the building industry. Pp. 551–587. In: Natural Zeolites: Occurrence, Properties, Applications. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Vol. 45. (D. Bish and D. Ming, editors) Mineralogical Society of America.Google Scholar
Cordeiro, G. & Toledo Filho, R. (2011) Influence of particle size and specific surface area on the pozzolanic activity of residual rice husk ash. Cement and Concrete Composites, 33, 529–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornejo, M., Elsen, J., Baykara, H. & Paredes, C. 2014, Hydration process of zeolite-rich tuffs and siltstoneblended cement pastes at low w/b ratio, under wet curing condition. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 18, 629–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cultrone, G., Sebastian, E. & Ortega Huertas, M. (2005) Forced and natural carbonation of lime-based mortars with and without additives: Mineralogical and textural changes. Cement and Concrete Research, 35, 2278–2289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Torre, A. & Aranda, M. (2011) Accuracy in Rietveld quantitative phase analysis of Portland cements. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 36, 1169–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EN 196-5. (2005) Methods of testing cement; Part 5: pozzolanicity test for pozzolan cements. European Committee for Standardization.Google Scholar
Eisinas, A., Baltakys, R. & Siauciunas, R. (2012) The effect of gyrolite additive on the hydration properties of Portland cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 42, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escalante-Garcia, J. & Sharp, J. (1998) Effect of temperature on the hydration of the main clinker phases in OPC: Part 1, neat cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 28, 1245–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estoková, A. & Kovalcíková, M. (2013) The study of zeolite based cement composites in aggressive environment. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 35, 1123–1128.Google Scholar
Fernández, R. and Martirena, F. (2011) The origin of the pozzolanic activity of calcined clay minerals: A comparison between kaolinite, illite and montmorillonite. Cement and Concrete Research, 41, 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragoulis, D., Chaniotakis, E. & Stamatakis, M. (1997) Zeolitic tuffs of Kimolos island, Aegean sea, Greece and their industrial potential. Cement and Concrete Research, 27, 889–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragoulis, D., Stamatakis, M., Papagcorgiou, A. & Chaniotakis, E. (2005) The physical and mechanical properties of composite cements manufactured with calcareous and clayey Greek diatomite mixtures. Cement and Concrete Composites, 27, 205–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghourchian, S., Wyrzykowski, M., Lura, P., Shekarchi, M. & Ahmadi, B. (2013) An investigation on the use of zeolite aggregates for internal curing of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 40, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleize, P. & Cyr, M. (2007) Effects of metakaolin on autogenous shrinkage of cement pastes. Cement and Concrete Composites, 29, 80–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanchara, S., Tomosawa, F., Kobayakawa, M. & Hwang, K. (2001) Effects of water/powder ratio, mixing ratio of fly ash and curing temperature on pozzolanic reaction of fly ash in cement paste. Cement and Concrete Research, 31, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heikal, M., El-Didamony, H. & Morsy, M. (2000) Limestone–filled pozzolanic cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 30, 1827–1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hover, K. (2011) The influence of water on the performance of concrete, Construction and Building Materials, 25, 3003–3013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Igarashi, S., Kawamura, M. & Wanatabe, A. (2004) Analysis of cement pastes and mortar by combination of backscatter-based SEM image analysis and calculations based on the Power model. Cement and Concrete Composites, 26, 977–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INEN 152 (2012) Standard specification for Portland cement. Instituto Ecuatoriano de Normalizacion. Quito-Ecuador.Google Scholar
Kakali, G., Tsivilis, S., Aggeli, E. & Bati, M. (2000), Hydration products of C3A, C3S and Portland cement in the presence of CaCO3. Cement and Concrete Research, 30, 1073–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khunthongkeaw, J., Tangtermsirikul, S. & Leelawat, T. (2011) A study on carbonation depth prediction for fly ash concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 20, 744–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocak, Y., Tasci, E. & Kaya, U. (2013) The effect of using natural zeolite on the properties and hydration characteristics of blended cements. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 720–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kontori, E., Perraki, T., Tsivilis, S. & Kakali, G. (2009) Zeolite blended cements: evaluation of their hydration rate by means of thermal analysis. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 96, 993–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpa, A. & Kowald, R. (2008) Hydration behavior, structure and morphology of hydration phases in advanced cement-based systems containing micro and nanoscale pozzolanic additive. Cement and Concrete Research, 38, 955–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpa, A. & Kowald, R. (2009), Phase development in normal and ultra high performance cementitious systems by quantitative x-ray analysis and thermoanalytical methods. Cement and Concrete Research, 39, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S., Kumar, R., Bandopadhyay, A., Alex, T., Kumar, R. & Das, S. (2011) Mechanical activation of granulated blast furnace slag and its effect on the properties and structure of Portland slag cement. Cement and Concrete Composites, 30, 679–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilkov, V., Petrov, O., Petkova, V., Petrova, N. & Tzvetanova, Y. (2011) Study of the pozzolanic activity and hydration products of cement pastes with addition of natural zeolites. Clay Minerals, 46(2), 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilkov, V., Rostovsky, I. & Petrov, O. (2011) Physical and mechanical characteristics of cement mortars and concretes with addition of clinoptilolite from Beli Plast deposit (Bulgaria), silica fume and fly ash. Clay Minerals, 46, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lothenbach, B., Scrivener, K. & Hooton, R. (2011) Supplementary cementitious materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 41, 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loukili, A., Khelidj, A. & Richard, P. (1999) Hydration kinetics, change of relative humidity, and autogenous shrinkage of ultra high strength concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 29, 577–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiels, L. (2010) La roca mágica: Zeolite occurrence and genesis in the late cretaceous Cayo arc of coastal Ecuador. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Google Scholar
Machiels, L., Garces, D., Snellings, R., Vilema, W., Morante, F., Paredes, C. & Elsen, J. (2014), Zeolite occurrence and genesis in the late-cretaceous Cayo arc of coastal Ecuador: Evidence for zeolite formation in cooling marine pyroclastic flow deposits. Applied Clay Science, 87, 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiels, L., Morante, F., Snellings, R., Calvo, B., Canoira, L., Paredes, C. & Elsen, J. (2008) Zeolite mineralogy of the Cayo formation in Guayaquil, Ecuador. Applied Clay Science, 42, 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsushita, T. & Hoshino, S. [I think also these authors: Maruyama I., Noguchi T. & Yamada K.] (2007) Effect of curing temperature and water to cement ratio hydration of cement compounds. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement (J.J. Beaudoin, editor). Cement Association of Canada, July 8 to 13, 2007 Montreal. I cannot find this reference.Google Scholar
Meddah, M.T.-H. (2009) Pore structure of concrete with mineral addition and its effect on self-desiccation shrinkage. ACI Material Journal, 106, 241–250.Google Scholar
Meeks, K. & Carino, N. (1999) Curing of highperformance concrete: Report of the state-of-theart. Technical Report NISTIR 6295, NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology. United States Department o f Commerce Technology Administration.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, G., Snellings, R., Van Balen, K., Bicer-Simsir, B., Verlooy, P. & Elsen, J. (2009) Pozzolanic reactions of common natural zeolites with lime and parameters affecting their reactivity. Cement and Concrete Research, 39, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. & Sakulich, A. (2011) Diatomaceous earth as a pozzolana in the fabrication of an alkali activated fine aggregate limestone concrete. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 93, 2828–2836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, L. & Margeson, J. (2006) Quantitative Rietveld analysis of hydrated cementitious systems, Powder Diffraction, 21, 111–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najimi, M., Sobhani, J., Ahmadi, B. & Shekarchi, M. (2012) An experimental study on durability properties of concrete containing zeolite as a highly reactive natural pozzolan, Construction and Building Materials, 35, 1023–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogawa, K., Uchikawa, H. and Takemoto, K. (1980) The mechanism of the hydration in the system C3Spozzolana. Cement and Concrete Research, 10, 683–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozer, B. & Ozkul, H. (2004) The influence of initial water curing on the strength development of ordinary cement and pozzolanic cement concretes. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacheco, F., Miraldo, S., Labrincha, J. & De Brito, J. (2012) An overview on concrete carbonation in the context of eco-efficient construction: Evaluation, use of SCMs and/or RAC. Construction and Building Materials, 36, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poon, C., Lam, L. & Kou, S. (1999) A study on the hydration rate of natural zeolite blended cement pastes. Construction and Building Materials, 13, 427–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poon, C., Wong, Y. & Lam, L. (1997) Influence of different curing conditions on the pore structure and related properties of fly-ash cement pastes and mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 11, 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramezanianpour, A. (1995) Effect of curing on the compressive strength, resistance to chloride ion penetration and porosity of concrete incorporating slag, fly ash or silica fume. Cement and Concrete Composites, 17, 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramezanianpour, A., Ghiasvand, E., Nickseresht, I., Mahdikhani, & Moodi, F. (2009) Influence of various amounts of limestone filler on performance of Portland limestone cement concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 31, 715–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabir, B. & Wild, S. (2001) Metakaolin and calcined clays as pozzolans for concrete: a review. Cement and Concrete Composites, 23, 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safiuddin, M., Raman, S. & Zain, M. (2007) Effect of different curing methods on the properties of microsilica concrete. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 2, 87–95.Google Scholar
Sajedi, F., Rasak, H. & Mahmud, H. (2012) Relationships between compressive strength of cement-slag mortars under air and water curing regimes. Construction and Building Materials, 31, 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sata, V., Tangpagasit, J., Jaturapitakkul, P. & Chindaprasirt, P. (2012) Effect of w/b ratios on pozzolanic reaction of biomass ashes in Portland cement matrix. Cement and Concrete Composites, 34, 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrivener, K. & Fullmann, T. (2004) Quantitative study of Portland cement hydration by XRD–Rietveld analysis and independent methods. Cement and Concrete Research 34, 1541–1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrivener, K. & Nonat, A. (2011) Hydration of cementitious materials, present and future. Cement and Concrete Research, 41, 651–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddque, R. & Klaus, J. (2009) Influence of metakaolin on the properties of mortar and concrete: A review. Applied Clay Science, 43, 392–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snellings, R. (2012) “Buffer” effects of natural zeolites in blended cements. Pp. 1404–1409. In: Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting III – Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting, ICCRRR 2012.Google Scholar
Snellings, R., Mertens, G., Cizer, O. & Elsen, J. (2010) Early age hydration and pozzolanic reaction in natural zeolite blended cements: Reaction kinetics and products by in situ synchrotron x-ray powder diffraction. Cement and Concrete Research, 40, 1704–1713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snellings, R., Mertens, G. & Elsen, J. (2012) Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Pp. 211–278. In: Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Vol. 74. Mineralogical Society of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talero, R. & Trusilewicz, L. (2011) Comparative and semi-quantitative XRD analysis of Friedel’s salt originating from pozzolan and Portland cement. Construction and Building Materials, 25, 2370–2380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Termkhajornkit, P. & Nawa, T. (2006) Effect of water curing conditions on the hydration degree and compressive strength of fly ash-cement paste. Cement and Concrete Composites, 28, 781–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valipour, M., Farhad, P., Shekarchi, M. & Khani, S. (2013) Comparing a natural pozzolan, zeolite, to metakaolin and silica fume in terms of their effect on the durability characteristics of concrete: a laboratory study. Construction and Building Materials, 41, 879–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigil de la Villa, R., Fernandez, R., Rodriguez, O., Garcia, R. & Villar-Cociña, E. (2013) Evolution of the pozzolanic activity of a thermally treated zeolite. Journal of Materials Science, 48, 3213–3224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, P. & Mitchell, L. (2003) Quantitative Rietveld analysis of the amorphous content in cement and clinkers. Journal of Materials Science, 38, 4415–4421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, B. & Ediz, N. (2008) The use of raw and calcined diatomite in cement production. Cement and Concrete Composites, 30, 202–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, B. & Ucar, A. (2007) Properties of zeolitic tuff (clinoptilolite) blended Portland cement. Building and Environment, 42, 3808–3815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, Q., Li, K., Feng-chong, T. & Dangla, P. (2012) Pore structure characterization of cement pastes blended with high-volume fly-ash. Cement and Concrete Research, 42, 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhutovsky, S. & Kovler, K. (2012) Effect of internal curing on durability-related properties of high performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 42, 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar