Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T22:35:36.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of calcination temperature on metakaolin structure for the synthesis of zeolites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2019

Magdalena Król  and
Piotr Rożek
Magdalena Król*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30 Mickiewicza Av., 30-059 Krakow, Poland
Piotr Rożek
Affiliation:
Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30 Mickiewicza Av., 30-059 Krakow, Poland
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this research was to determine the temperature of kaolin calcination in order to obtain an intermediate product (metakaolin) for the synthesis of geopolymers with potential application as self-supporting zeolitic membranes. The products obtained were analysed with X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The structural analysis of the metakaolins obtained suggested that the optimal temperature for the proposed application is 700°C. After alkali activation of metakaolin, it is possible to obtain zeolite A and hydroxysodalite. The factors analysed, determining the type and quantity of crystalline phases, were activation temperature and concentration of sodium hydroxide solution (activator). The largest amounts of zeolites were obtained by alkali activation with 9 mol/dm3 NaOH solution at 70°C.

Keywords

kaolinmetakaolincalcinationalkali activationgeopolymerself-supported membranezeolite A
Type
Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 657 - 663
Copyright
Copyright © Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: J. Labrincha

References

REFERENCES

Abo-El-Enein, S.A., Amin, M.S., El-Hosiny, F.I., Hanafi, S., ElSokkary, T.M. & Hazem, M.M. (2014) Pozzolanic and hydraulic activity of nano-metakaolin. HBRC Journal, 10, 64–72.Google Scholar
Bolewski, A. & Żabiński, W. (1979) Metody Badań Minerałów i Skał (in polish). Wydawnictwa Geologiczne, Kraków, Poland.Google Scholar
Brylewska, K., Rożek, P., Król, M. & Mozgawa, W. (2018) The influence of dealumination/desilication on structural properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers. Ceramics International, 44, 12853–12861.Google Scholar
Christidis, G.E. (2011) Industrial clays. Pp. 341–414 in: Advances in the Characterization of Industrial Minerals (Christidis, G.E., editor). EMU Notes in Mineralogy, 9, European Mineralogical Union and the Mineralogical Society of Great Britain & Ireland, London.Google Scholar
Cundy, C.S. & Cox, P.A. (2005) The hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites: precursors, intermediates and reaction mechanism. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 82, 1–78.Google Scholar
Davidovits, J. (1991) Geopolymers – inorganic polymeric new materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 37, 1633–1656.Google Scholar
Davidovits, J. (2016) Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications. www.geopolymer.orgGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Jimenez, A. & Palomo, A. (2005) Chemical durability of geopolymers. Pp. 167–193 in: Geopolymer, Green Chemistry and Sustainable Development Solutions (Davidovits, J., editor). Geopolymer Institute, Saint-Quentin, France.Google Scholar
Kakali, G., Perraki, T., Tsivilis, S. & Badogiannis, E. (2001) Thermal treatment of kaolin: the effect of mineralogy on the pozzolanic activity. Applied Clay Science, 20, 73–80.Google Scholar
Kenne Diffo, B.B., Elimbi, A., Cyr, M., Dika Manga, J. & Tchakoute Kouamo, H. (2015) Effect of the rate of calcination of kaolin on the properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies, 3, 130–138.Google Scholar
Khalid, H.R., Lee, N.K., Park, S.M., Abbas, N. & Lee, H.K. (2018) Synthesis of geopolymer-supported zeolites via robust one-step method and their adsorption potential. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 353, 522–533.Google Scholar
Król, M., Minkiewicz, J. & Mozgawa, W. (2016) IR spectroscopy studies of zeolites in geopolymeric materials derived from kaolinite. Journal of Molecular Structure, 1126, 200–206.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Yan, C., Zhang, Z., Gong, Y., Wang, H. & Qiu, X. (2016) A facile method for preparation of floatable and permeable fly ash-based geopolymer block. Materials Letters, 185, 370–373.Google Scholar
Minelli, M., Papa, E., Medri, V., Miccio, F., Benito, P., Doghieri, F. & Landi, E. (2018) Characterization of novel geopolymer – zeolite composites as solid adsorbents for CO2 capture. Chemical Engineering Journal, 341, 505–515.Google Scholar
Mozgawa, W., Jastrzębski, W. & Handke, M. (2006) Cation-terminated structural clusters as a model for the interpretation of zeolite vibrational spectra. Journal of Molecular Structure, 792–793, 163–169.Google Scholar
Mozgawa, W. (2007) Spektroskopia Oscylacyjna Zeolitów (in polish). Wydawnictwa AGH, Kraków, Poland.Google Scholar
Osornio-Rubio, N.R., Torres-Ochoa, J.A., Palma-Tirado, M.L., Iménez-Islas, H.J., Rosas-Cedillo, R., Fierro-Gonzalez, J.C. & Martínez-González, G.M. (2016) Study of the dehydroxylation of kaolinite and alunite from a Mexican clay with DRIFTS-MS. Clay Minerals, 51, 55–68.Google Scholar
Papa, E., Medri, V., Amari, S., Manaud, J., Benito, P., Vaccari, A. & Landi, E. (2018) Zeolite–geopolymer composite materials: production and characterization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 76–84.Google Scholar
Provis, J.L. & van Deventer, J.S.J. (2009) Geopolymers: Structure, Processing, Properties and Industrial Applications. Woodhead Publishing, Abingdon, UK.Google Scholar
Rożek, P., Król, M. & Mozgawa, W. (2018) Spectroscopic studies of fly ash-based geopolymers. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 198, 283–289.Google Scholar
Snellings, R., Mertens, G. & Elsen, J. (2012) Supplementary cementitious materials. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 74, 211–278.Google Scholar
Tarte, P. (1967) Infra-red spectra of inorganic aluminates and characteristic vibrational frequencies of AlO4 tetrahedra and AlO6 octahedra. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Spectroscopy, 23, 2127–2143.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Yan, C., Li, D., Zhou, F., Liu, Y., Zhou, C. & Komarneni, S. (2018) In situ transformation of geopolymer gels to self-supporting NaX zeolite monoliths with excellent compressive strength. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 261, 164–169.Google Scholar
Xu, H. & van Deventer, J.S.J. (2000) The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 59(3), 247–266.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., He, Y., Wang, Y., Mao, J. & Cui, X. (2014) Synthesis of a self-Supporting faujasite zeolite membrane using geopolymer gel for separation of alcohol/water mixture. Materials Letters, 116, 167–170.Google Scholar
Zuhua, Z., Xiao, Y., Huajun, Z. & Yue, C. (2009) Role of water in the synthesis of calcined kaolin-based geopolymer. Applied Clay Science, 43, 218–223.Google Scholar