Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:47:46.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The correspondence between optical and X-ray measurements of particle orientation in clays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

J. S. Tchalenko
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Imperial College, London S.W.7
A. D. Burnett
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, lmperial College, London S.W.7
J. J. Hung
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Enginering, National Taiwan University, Taipei

Abstract

The spatial arrangement of platy particles in a clay is defined by an orientation ratio which can be derived analytically from optical birefringence as well as from X-ray diffraction data. Measurements on kaolin slurries consolidated by increasing loads were used to verify that orientation ratios obtained experimentally by these two methods are in fact equivalent. In contrast it was found that particle orientation cannot be assessed objectively from electronmicrographs alone. A combined optical-X-ray study of two natural clays (London Clay and Lias Clay) revealed that the kaolinite crystals are oriented only slightly more than the illite crystals, and showed that the correspondence between optical and X-ray measurements is also valid for natural clays.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brindley, G.W. (1953) Mineralog. Mag., 30, 71.Google Scholar
Brindley, G.W. & Robinson, K. (1946) Mineralog. Mag., 27, 242.Google Scholar
Chandler, R.J. (1971). Inst. Brit. Geog., Sp. Pubi. 3, 51.Google Scholar
Coe, R.H. (1970) The Effect of weathering on the microstructure of Lias Clay. M.Sc. Thesis (Unpublished), University of London.Google Scholar
Gillot, J.E. (1968) Clay in Engineering Geology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gillot, J.E. (1969). J. sedim. Petrol, 39, 90.Google Scholar
Gillot, J.E. (1970) Eng. Geol. 4, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, J.S. & Bragg, R.H. (1966) Ceramic Microstructures: Their analysis, significance and production (R. M. Fulrath and J. A. Pask, editors), Chap. 7, 207, John Wiley and Sons, N. York.Google Scholar
Lippman, F. (1970) Centr. Mineral und Petrol, 25, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R.T. (1966) Clays Clay Miner. 1966, 271, Pergamon Press, N.York.Google Scholar
Meade, R.H. (1961) U.S. geol. Surv., Prof. Paper 424B, B273.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J.K. (1956) Proc. Highways. Res. Bd., 35, 693.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, N.R., Mitchell, J.K. & Quigley, R.M. (1969) 1th Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. 3, 455, Mexico.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, N.R. & Tchalenko, J.S. (1967a) Shear strength properties of natural soils and rocks, Vol. 1, 147, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, N.R. & Tchalenko, J.S. (1967b) Proc. R. Soc. Lon. A, 300, 218.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, N.R. & Tchalenko, J.S. (1967c) Proc. R. Soc. Lon. A, 300, 235.Google Scholar
Mossman, M.H., Freas, D.H. & Bailey, S.W. (1967) Clays Clay Miner. 1966, 441, Pergamon Press, N. York.Google Scholar
Roscoe, K.H. (1967). Shear strength properties of natural soils and rocks, Vol. 2, 167, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo.Google Scholar
Schultz, L.G. (1964). U.S. geol. Surv., Prof. Paper. 391C.Google Scholar
Smart, P. (1969). Civil Engineering Materials (M. Teeni, editor), 21/1, John Wiley and Sons, N.York.Google Scholar
Sturm, E. & Lodding, W. (1968). Acta crystallogr. AZ4, 650.Google Scholar
Tchalenko, J.S. (1967) The influence of shear and consolidation on the microstructure of some clays. Ph.D. Thesis (Unpublished). University of London.Google Scholar
Tchalenko, J.S. (1968) Q. Jlengng. Geol, 1, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar