Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:37:08.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical reactivity of some reservoir illites: implications for petroleum production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

C. R. Hughes
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Sheffield, Beaumont Building, Brookhill, Sheffield S3 7HF
R. C. Davey
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Sheffield, Beaumont Building, Brookhill, Sheffield S3 7HF
C. D. Curtis
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL

Abstract

Authigenic illite samples have been isolated from preserved reservoir core and characterized by XRD, XRF, SEM and ATEM. Reactivity towards aqueous solutions containing acids, alkalis, complexing agents and reducing agents has been evaluated using both static (flasks) and dynamic (flow-cell) experiments at 80°C and atmospheric pressure. In flask experiments with dilute reagents, reaction appears to be simple stoichiometric dissolution. The same pattern extends to higher concentrations (molar), except for alkalis where Si is preferentially leached leaving an Al-rich residual phase. Under the more vigorous conditions of flow (continuous leaching by fresh reactant solutions), stronger acid and alkaline solutions both cause substantial dissolution although by different mechanisms. Acids displace K+ and cause illite to swell. In many of these experiments, gels were seen to precipitate downstream from the reaction site. These reactions are rapid, taking place in hours at 80°C. Similar reactions can be expected to take place in consequence of a range of drilling, stimulation and production procedures. Clay dissolution, modification and, possibly, migration would be anticipated close to the well-bore and damage from scaling (gels) somewhat further away.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cuff, G. & Lorimer, G.W. (1975) The quantitative analysis of thin specimens. J. Microscopy, 103, 203–207.Google Scholar
Curtis, C.D., Hughes, C.R., Whiteman, J.A. & Whittle, C.K. (1985) Compositional variation within some chlorites and some comments on their origin. Mineral. Mag., 49, 375–386.Google Scholar
Hughes, C.R., Curtis, C.D., Whiteman, J.A. & Heping, S. (1989) Applications of analytical transmission electron microscopy to clay mineral geochemistry studies. In: Electron Microscopy and Microprobe Techniques in Clay Analyses. Course notes for the 1986 meeting, The City Minerals Society.Google Scholar
Hughes, C.R. (1987) The composition and origin of layer silicates in iron-formations and ironstones: a preliminary analytical transmission electron microscopical study. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Phakey, P.P., Curtis, C.D. & Oertal, G. (1972) Transmission electron microscopy of fine-grained phyllosilicates in ultra-thin rock sections. Clays Clay Miner., 20, 193–197.Google Scholar
Sass, B.M., Rosenberg, P.E. & Kittrick, J.A. (1987) The stability of illite/smectite during diagenesis; an experimental study. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 51, 2103–2115.Google Scholar