Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:43:26.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characteristics of fine pores in some halloysites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

G. J. Churchman
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Soils, Glen Osmond, South Australia
T. J. Davy
Affiliation:
Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia
L. A. G. Aylmore
Affiliation:
Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia
R. J. Gilkes
Affiliation:
Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia
P. G. Self
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Soils, Glen Osmond, South Australia

Abstract

Isotherms were obtained for nitrogen adsorption and desorption on seven halloysite-rich samples from New Zealand and Western Australia. Calculations from these isotherms indicate that halloysites with mainly small particles (< c. 0.08 μm in width) had abundant cylindrical pores with narrow size distributions in the 5-15 nm range. They also indicate that halloysites with mainly large particles (> c. 0.1 μm in width) had few if any pores in the mesopore range (2–50 nm). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) shows that cylindrical pores originate from the central holes in tubular particles. The TEM also suggests that slit-shaped pores can originate from the shrinkage of blocks of layers upon dehydration of halloysite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aylmore, L.A.G. (1974a) Gas sorption in clay mineral systems. Clays Clay Miner. 22, 175183.Google Scholar
Avlmore, L.A.G. (1974b) Hysteresis in gas sorption. J. Colloid Interf Sci. 46, 410416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aylmore, L.A.G. (1977) Microporosity in montmorillo-nite from nitrogen and carbon dioxide sorption. Clays Clay Miner. 25, 148154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aylmore, L.A.G. & Quirk, J.P. (1960) Domain or turbostratic structure of clays. Nature, 187, 1046-1048.Google Scholar
Aylmore, L.A.G. & Quirk, J.P. (1967) The micropore size distribution of clay mineral systems. J. Soil Sci. 18, 1-17.Google Scholar
Aylmore, L.A.G. & Sills, I.D. (1978) Pore structure and mechanical strength of soils in relation to their constitution. Pp. 6978 in: Modification of Soil Structure (Emerson, W.W., Bond, R.D. & Dexter, A.R., editors). John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Blakemore, L.C., Searle, P.L. & Daly, B.K. (1987) Methods for chemical analysis of soils. N.Z. Soil Bureau Scientific Report, 80.Google Scholar
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P.H. & Teller, E. (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J. . Am. Chem. Soc. 60, 309310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchman, G.J. & Burke, C.M. (1991) Properties of subsoils in relation to various measures of surface area and water content. J. Soil Sci. 42, 463478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchman, G.J. & Carr, R.M. (1975) The definition and nomenclature of halloysites. Clays Clay Miner. 23, 382388.Google Scholar
Churchman, G.J. & Gilkes, R.J. (1989) Recognition of intermediates in the possible transformation of halloysite to kaolinite in weathering profiles. Clay Miner. 24, 579590.Google Scholar
Churchman, G.J. & Payne, D. (1983) Mercury intrusion porisimetry of some New Zealand soils in relation to clay mineralogy and texture. J. Soil Sci. 34, 437451.Google Scholar
Churchman, G.J. & Theng, B.K.G. (1984) Interactions of halloysites with amides: mineralogical factors affecting complex formation. Clay Miner. 19, 161175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boer, J.H., Van Den Heuval, A. & Linsen, B.G. (1964) Studies of pore systems in catalysis. IV. The two causes of reversible hysteresis. J. Catalysis, 3, 268273.Google Scholar
Diamond, S. (1970) Pore size distribution in clays. Clays Clay Miner. 18, 7-23.Google Scholar
Dixon, J.B. (1989) Kaolin and serpentine group minerals. Pp. 467525 in: Minerals in Soil Environments (Dixon, J. B. & Weed, S. B., editors). Soil Science Society America, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Gregg, S.J. & Sing, K.S.W. (1967) Adsorption, Surf.ace Area and Porosity. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Jackson, B.L.J., Metcalfe, A. & Wilcock, R.J. (1971) Adsorption hysteresis on disordered kaolinite. Trans. Farad. Soc. 67, 21372144.Google Scholar
Kohyama, N., Fukushima, K. & Fukami, A. (1978) Observation of the hydrated form of tubular halloysite by an electron microscope equipped with an environmental cell. Clays Clay Miner. 26, 2540.Google Scholar
Lippens, B.C. & De Boer, J.H. (1965) Studies on pore systems in catalysis. V. The t method. J. Catalysis 4, 319323.Google Scholar
Mccrea, A.F. & Gilkes, R.J. (1987) The microstructure of lateritic pallid zone. Pp. 501506 in: Micro-morphologie des Sols — Soil Micromorphology. Proc. VIIth Int. Working Meeting on Soil Micro-morphology, Paris, July 1985. Association Francaise pour l'Etude du Sol.Google Scholar
Mccrea, A.F., Anano, R.R. & Gmkes, R.J. (1990) Mineralogical and physical properties of lateritic pallid zone materials developed from granite and dolerite. Geoderma, 47, 3347.Google Scholar
NEW ZEALAND SOIL BUREAU (1968) Soils of New Zealand, Part 3. N.Z. Soil Bureau Bulletin 26, (3).Google Scholar
Parfitt, R.L. (1990) Allophane in New Zealand — a review. Aust. J. Soil Res. 28, 343360.Google Scholar
Parfixt, R.L. & Chmds, C.W. (1988) Estimation of forms of Fe and Al: a review, and analysis of contrasting soils by dissolution and Mössbauer methods. Aust. J. Soil Res. 26, 121144.Google Scholar
Parfitr, R.L. & Wilson, A.D. (1985) Estimation of allophane and halloysite in three sequences of volcanic soils, New Zealand. Catena Supplement 7, 18.Google Scholar
Pierce, C. (1968) The universal nitrogen isotherm. J. Phys. Chem. 72, 36733676.Google Scholar
Rousseaux, J.M. & WarkentinN, B.P. (1976) Surface properties and forces holding water in allophane soils. Soil ScL Soc. Am. J. 40, 446451.Google Scholar
Shull, C.G. (1948) The determination of pore size distribution from gas adsorption data. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 70, 14051414.Google Scholar
Sills, I.D., Aylmore, L.A.G. & Qumirk, J.P. (1973a) An analysis of pore size in illite-kaolinite mixtures. J. Soil Sci. 24, 480490.Google Scholar
Sills, I.D., Aylmore, L.A.G. & Quirk, J.P. (1973b) A comparison between mercury injection and nitrogen sorption as methods of determining pore size distributions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37, 535537.Google Scholar
Sills, I.D., Aylmore, L.A.G. & Quirk, J.P. (1974) Relationship between pore size distributions and physical properties of clay soils. Aust. J. Soil Res. 12, 107117.Google Scholar
Singh, B. & Gilkes, R.J. (1992) An electron optical investigation of the alteration of kaolinite to halloysite. Clays Clay Miner. 40, 212229.Google Scholar
Spurr, A.R. (1969) A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J. Ultrastructure Res. 26, 3143.Google Scholar
Whitton, J.S. & Churchman, G.J. (1987) Standard methods for mineral analysis of soil survey samples for characterisation and classification. N.Z. Soil Bureau Scientific Report, 79.Google Scholar