Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:22:14.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the interaction of cationic surfactants with clay minerals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

W. U. Malik ,
S. K. Srivastava  and
Devendra Gupta
W. U. Malik
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, University of Roorkee, Roorkee, India
S. K. Srivastava
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, University of Roorkee, Roorkee, India
Devendra Gupta
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, University of Roorkee, Roorkee, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adsorption and desorption of cationic surfactants, cetyl pyridinium bromide, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide, dodecyl pyridinium bromide on bentonite, kaolinite and illite, and their diffusion through a bentonite membrane have been studied.

The binding of these compounds on the mineral surface takes place much beyond the exchange capacity. For excessive saturations with long chain compounds like these, the chains stand erect to the surface. A correlation of area per exchange site and area associated with surfactant molecule on clay surface also supports this view. The increase in the extent of adsorption with the size of the organic cation is due to an increase in the van der Waal's forces between clay and surfactant molecule. Isosteric heats of adsorption at different stages of surface covered with surfactant have also been determined and the same was found to pass through a minimum point. Larger ions desorb less, owing to the lesser solubility and larger contribution of dispersion forces.

Permeability of these surfactants and energy of activation of the diffusion process through the H- bentonite membrane has also been investigated. Diffusion of these cations takes place via exchange positions through the membrane and the order is exactly the reverse of their adsorption on the clay surface.

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 1972 , pp. 369 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adhikari, M. (1968) J. Indian chem. Soc. 45, 95.Google Scholar
Chakravarty, S.K. (1957) Sci. Cult. 22, 170.Google Scholar
Clare, K.E. (1947) Nature, Lond. 160, 828.Google Scholar
Corrin, M.L., Lind, E.L., Roginsky, A. & Harkins, W.D. (1949) J. Colloid Sci. 4, 485.Google Scholar
Cowan, C.T. & White, D. (1958) Trans. Faraday Soc. 54, 691.Google Scholar
Davidson, D.T. (1960) Bull. la Engng. Exp. Stn, 168.Google Scholar
Dyal, R.S. & Hendricks, S.B. (1950) Soil Sci. 69, 421.Google Scholar
Few, A.V. & Ottewill, R.H. (1958)/. Colloid Sci. 11, 34.Google Scholar
Fu, Y., Hanson, R.S. & Bartell, F.E. (1948) J. phys. Colloid Chem. 52, 374.Google Scholar
Grossey, F.X. & Woolsey, L.J. (1955) Ind. Engng Chem. ind. (int.) Edn. 47, 2253.Google Scholar
Jordan, J.W. (1949) J. phys. Chem., 53, 294.Google Scholar
Lai, T.M. & Mortland, M.M. (1960) Proc. Am. Soil Sci. Soc. 25, 353.Google Scholar
Lyubinova, T. Yu. & Ivanov, F.M. (1950) Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 70, 1045.Google Scholar
Macewan, D.C.M. (1956) Kolloid-Zeitschrift, 149, 96.Google Scholar
Marshall, C.E. (1939) J. phys. Chem., 43, 1155.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, H. (1962) J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 2, 99.Google Scholar
Schlogl, R. & Stein, B. (1958) Z. Elektrochem. 62, 340.Google Scholar
Van Olphen, H. (1963) An Introduction to Clay Colloid Chemistry p. 90-93. Interscience Pub., New York.Google Scholar