Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:15:26.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acid and alkali treatment of kaolins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

M. Pentrák ,
J. Madejová  and
P. Komadel
M. Pentrák*
Affiliation:
Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, SK-845 36 Bratislava, Slovakia
J. Madejová
Affiliation:
Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, SK-845 36 Bratislava, Slovakia
P. Komadel
Affiliation:
Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, SK-845 36 Bratislava, Slovakia
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two kaolins containing kaolinites of different crystallinity, as confirmed by the Aparicio-Galán-Ferrell index, were treated in HCl and KOH solutions at 95º and 80ºC, respectively, for periods up to 36 h. Changes resulting from the treatments have been characterized by several methods. Fe occurs in the octahedral sheets of both kaolinites and dissolves similarly to Al. Lower structural ordering, more structural defects and particles of smaller average size and less regular shape are responsible for faster dissolution of KGa-2 in comparison to well ordered Gold Field (Tanzania) kaolinite. More Si than Al is dissolved in KOH from both kaolins after any dissolution time. An aluminosilicate (feldspathoid) phase is thought to occur in the material prepared from KGa-2 in KOH. Near-IR spectra provide very useful information on changes in the mineral structure upon the treatments, on the solid reaction products and on the adsorbed water molecules.

Keywords

kaolinitestructural orderingdissolutionstructural modificationnear-IR spectroscopyX-ray diffraction
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 511 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aparicio, P. & Galán, E. (1999) Mineralogical interference on kaolinite crystallinity index measurements. Clays and Clay Minerals, 47, 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aparicio, P., Galán, E. & Ferrell, R.E. (2006) A new kaolinite order index based on XRD profile fitting. Clay Minerals, 41, 811–817.Google Scholar
Bauer, A. & Berger, G. (1998) Kaolinite and smectite dissolution rate in high molar KOH solutions at 35° and 80°C. Applied Geochemistry, 13, 905–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, A. & Velde, B. (1999) Smectite transformation in high molar KOH solutions. Clay Minerals, 34, 259–273.Google Scholar
Bauer, A., Velde, B. & Berger, G. (1998) Kaolinite transformation in high molar KOH solutions. Applied Geochemistry, 13, 619–629.Google Scholar
Bauluz, B., Mayayo, M.J., Yuste, A. & González López, J.M. (2008) Genesis of kaolinite from Albian sedimentary deposits of the Iberian Range (NE Spain): analysis by XRD, SEM and TEM. Clay Minerals, 43, 459–475.Google Scholar
Brindley, G.W., Kao, C.C., Harrison, J.L., Lipsicas, M. & Raythatha, R. (1986) Relation between structural disorder and other characteristics of kaolinites and dickites. Clays and Clay Minerals, 34, 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delineau, T., Allard, T., Müller, J.P., Barres, O., Yvon, J. & Cases, J.M. (1994) FTIR reflectance vs. EPR studies of structural iron in kaolinites. Clays and Clay Minerals, 42, 308–320.Google Scholar
Dubikova, M., Cambier, P., Šucha, V. & Çaploviçová, M. (2002) Experimental soil acidification. Applied Geochemistry, 17, 245–257.Google Scholar
Ece, O.I., Nakagawa, Z.E. & Schroeder, P.A. (2003) Alteration of volcanic rocks and genesis of kaolin deposits in the Śile region, northern Istanbul, Turkey. I: Clay mineralogy. Clays and Clay Minerals, 51, 675–688.Google Scholar
Farmer, V.C. (1974) The layer silicates. Pp. 331–363 in: The Infrared Spectra of Minerals (Farmer, V.C., editor). The Mineralogical Society, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, V.C., Fraser, A.R. & Tait, J.M. (1979) Characterization of the chemical structures of natural and synthetic aluminosilicate gels and sols by infrared spectroscopy. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Ada, 43, 1399–1586.Google Scholar
Furquim, S.A.C., Graham, R.C., Barbiero, L., Pereira de Queiroz Neto, J. & Valles, V. (2008) Mineralogy and genesis of smectites in an alkaline-saline environment of Pantanal Wetland, Brazil. Clays and Clay Minerals, 56, 579–595.Google Scholar
Galán, E., Carretero, M.I. & Fernandez-Caliani, J.C. (1999) Effects of acid mine drainage on clay minerals suspended in the Tinto River (Rio Tinto, Spain), an experimental approach. Clay Minerals, 34, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, W.P., Anderson, J.S., Raven, M.D. & Churchman, G.J. (2002) Mineralogy of a bentonite from Miles, Queensland, Australia and characterisation of its acid activation products. Applied Clay Science, 20, 189–197.Google Scholar
Harvey, C.C. & Lagaly, G. (2006) Conventional applications. Pp. 979–995 in: Handbook of Clay Science (Bergaya, F., Theng, B.K.G. & Lagaly, G., editors) Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Hillier, S. & Lumsdon, D.G. (2008) Distinguishing opaline silica from cristobalite in bentonites: a practical procedure and perspective based on NaOH dissolution. Clay Minerals, 43, 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinckley, D.N. (1963) Variability in ‘crystallinity’ values among the kaolin deposits of the coastal plain of Georgia and South Carolina. Clays and Clay Minerals, 11, 229–235.Google Scholar
Johnston, C.T., Elzea Kogel, J., Bish, D.L., Kogure, T. & Murray, H.H. (2008) Low-temperature FTIR study of kaolin-group minerals. Clays and Clay Minerals, 56, 470–485.Google Scholar
Jozefaciuk, G. & Bowanko, G. (2002) Effect of acid and alkali treatment on surface areas and adsorption energies of selected minerals. Clays and Clay Minerals, 50, 771–783.Google Scholar
Jozefaciuk, G. & Matyka-Sarzynska, D. (2006) Effect of acid treatment and alkali treatment on nanopore properties of selected minerals. Clays and Clay Minerals, 54, 220–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komadel, P., Stucki, J.W. & Çiçel, B. (1993) Readily HCl-soluble iron in the fine fractions of some Czech bentonites. Geologica Carpathica — Clays, 44, 11–16.Google Scholar
Komadel, P., Madejová, J., Janek, M., Gates, W.P., Kirkpatrick, R.J. & Stucki, J.W. (1996) Dissolution of hectorite in inorganic acids. Clays and Clay Minerals, 44, 228–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madejová, J. & Komadel, P. (2001) Baseline studies of The Clay Minerals Society Source Clays: Infrared methods. Clays and Clay Minerals, 49, 410–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madejová, J., Kraus, I. & Komadel, P. (1995) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic characterization of dioctahedral smectites and illites from the main Slovak deposits. Geologica Carpathica — Clays, 4, 23–32.Google Scholar
Madejová, J., Bujdák, J., Janek, M. & Komadel, P. (1998) Comparative FT-IR study of the structural modifications during acid treatment of dioctahedral smectites and hectorite. Spectrochimica Ada A, 54, 1397–1406.Google Scholar
Madejová, J., Janek, M., Komadel, P., Herbert, H.J. & Moog, H.C. (2002) FTIR analyses of water in MX-80 bentonite compacted from high salinary salt solution systems. Applied Clay Science, 20, 255–271.Google Scholar
Madejová, J., Pentrák, M., Pálková, H. & Komadel, P. (2009) Near-infrared spectroscopy: A powerful tool in studies of acid-treated clay minerals. Vibrational Spectroscopy, 49, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, V. & Ganor, J. (2001) Stirring effect on kaolinite dissolution rate. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Ada, 65, 3475–3490.Google Scholar
Moll, W.F. Jr. (2001) Baseline studies of The Clay Minerals Society Source Clays: Geological origin. Clays and Clay Minerals, 49, 374–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, H.H. (1999) Applied clay mineralogy today and tomorrow. Clay Minerals, 34, 39–49.Google Scholar
Murray, H.H. (2000) Traditional and new applications for kaolin, smectite, and palygorskite: a general overview. Applied Clay Science, 17, 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiang, X. (1996) The environmental problems and countermeasures of mineral resources utilization in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 6, 97–103.Google Scholar
Petit, S. & Decarreau, A. (1990) Hydrothermal (200°C) synthesis and crystal chemistry of iron-rich kaolinites. Clay Minerals, 25, 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, S, Decarreau, A., Martin, F. & Buchet, R. (2004) Refined relationship between the position of the fundamental OH stretching and the first overtones for clays. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 31, 585–592.Google Scholar
Sanz, J., Madani, A. & Serratosa, J.M. (1988) Aluminium- 27 and Silicon-29 Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance study of the kaolinite—mullite transformation. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 71, 418–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, B., Mackinnon, I.D.R. & Page, D. (1996) Process for forming alumino-silicate derivatives. AU Patent, WO 96/18577.Google Scholar
Tkáç, I., Komadel, P. & Müller, D. (1994) Acid-treated montmorillonites — a study by 29Si and 27Al MAS NMR. Clay Minerals, 29, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, H., Deng, Y., Harsh, J.B., Flury, M. & Boyle, J.S. (2004) Alteration of kaolinite to cancrinite and sodalite by simulated Hanford tank waste and its impact on cesium retention. Clays and Clay Minerals, 52, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar