Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:34:39.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Slope ratios of differential thermal curves of dickite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

R. J. W. Mclaughlin*
Affiliation:
Geology Department, University of Melbourne, Australia
Get access

Abstract

The relationships between the shapes of kaolinite and dickite differential thermal curves are described. The slope ratios of dickite are distinctly greater than those of kaolinite of equivalent particle size for the endothermic peak at about 550ºC and the same effect is observed for the exothermic peak at about 980ºC especially in diluted samples. The packing density of dickite does not differ markedly from that of kaolinite and the curve obtained for weight vs. area of the endothermic peak is in agreement with this. The dickite samples, however, give slightly lower areas than those of kaolinite, an effect that is dependent on the shape of the particles. The exothermic peak is shown to be influenced considerably in shape and size by thermal gradients.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bramão, L., Cady, J. G., Hendricks, S. B., and Swerdlow, M., 1952. Soil Sci., 73, 273.Google Scholar
Carthew, A. R., 1955. Amer. Min., 40, 107.Google Scholar
Dean, L. A., 1947. Soil Sei., 63, 95.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, R. W., and Roberts, A. L., 1953. Trans. Brit. Ceram. Soc., 52, 50.Google Scholar
Kerr, P. F. (editor), 1951. Preliminary Reports: Reference Clay Minerals. American Petroleum Institute, Research Project 49.Google Scholar
Mclaughlin, R. J. W., 1959. Geoehim. et cosmoch. Acta, 17, 11.Google Scholar
Mclaughlin, R. J. W., 1961. Trans. Brit. Ceram. Soe., 60, 177.Google Scholar
Martin, R. T., and Lambe, T. W., 1957. Clay Min. Bull., 3, 137.Google Scholar
Roy, R., and Osborne, E. F., 1954. Amer. Min., 39, 853.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. R., and Heckroodt, R. O., 1959. Miner. Mag., 32, 314.Google Scholar
Wittels, M., 1951. Amer. Min., 36, 760.Google Scholar