Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:37:36.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XPHN: EXPHN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

M. Platnauer
Affiliation:
Brasenose College, Oxford.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 3 note 1 I am indebted to Mr. M. N. Tod for these facts.

page 3 note 1 Where lexica exist I have used them; where not, I have searched the text. Neither the human eye nor human attention is infallible. I can only hope that omissions, if any, are few.

page 3 note 2 .

page 3 note 3 I cite from the texts respectively of Murray and Pearson. For Eur. fragg. I use Nauck.

page 4 note 1 Where would be possible only by prodelision or crasis I regard as metrically guaranteed.

page 4 note 2 Cf. Hense on Stob. iv, p. 728,1. It isnot clear whether Bergk meant a late Sophoclean play or a post-Sophoclean play. In any case Wilamowitz definitely regards itas post-Sophoclean (Hermes, lxiv. 465).

page 4 note 1 I purposely omit Eur. fr. 1109. 2 ()as almost certainly spurious (cf. hypoth. to Rhesus, p. 2, 1. II (Murray) ); also/r. 953. 1 (‘not Euripidean’: Wilamowitz in Hermes, xv. 491); also fr. adesp. 111. 2 ()—a fragment attributed to Eur. by Meineke (Jahrb.f. Philol. lxxxvii. 381), without, as it seems to me, any justification.

page 5 note 1 I say 8, not 7, as I have added Neophron, fr. 2. 7 ().

page 5 note 2 I cite from the Oxford text of Aristophanes, and from Kock, vol. i.