Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-v2ckm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-14T23:23:18.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Unity of the Latin Subjunctive: A Quest - I. Conway on Sonnenschein

Review products

I. Conway on Sonnenschein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

R. S. Conway
R. S. Conway
Affiliation:
Derbyshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 24 , Issue 7 , November 1910 , pp. 215 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1910

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf. Verg. Aen. 2. 546, Livy 21. 10, 11, which (like the common quid fiet) are familiar instances of uses proper only to Subjunctive forms.

2 What, by the way, is the earliest date to which we can trace the use of the name? How much earlier is it than the generation of Greek scholars who educated Cicero? Is it even so early? Varro (Ling. Lat. 10. 30, cp. 9. 25) calls it the species optandi. Prof. Lindsay's account of the Latin Grammarians, so complete in the earlier chapters of his Latin Language, seems to fail us completely in C. VIII.