Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:52:16.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two notes on Cicero, De Senectute

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

W. S. Maguinness
W. S. Maguinness
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 48 , Issue 6 , December 1934 , pp. 211 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 211 note 1 contemnas is no less an example of the construction in question because the verb owes its mood in the first place to ut. The same situation arises when the generalization takes the form of a dependent question, e.g. ‘ nisi statuas quid facere debeas. …’

page 212 note 1 Of the Letters I can only say that the cases quoted in Nizolius' Lexicon Ciceronianum offer no exception to this rule.