Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:42:28.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two Early Lists of St. Cyprian's Works

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1892

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 205 note 1 I would read Adornans.

page 206 note 1 But an alternative explanation is possible; see below.

page 205 note 1 It ought to be noted here that by an oversight in Dr. Sanday's lists, the ad Demetrianum is incorrectly omitted for O4 O5, and both the ad Delnetrianum and de bono patientiae for S : and also that though the de zelo et livore is not now extant in S, yet since the end of no. 9(debono patientiae) and commencement of no. 11 (arl Fortunatum) are both also wanting, it is not impossible that the lost gatherings may hare contained no. 10 as well.

page 208 note 1 Possibly pro m. i.

page 208 note 2 Possibly clxxxiiii.

page 208 note 3 This and the next line are added by a second hand at the foot of the page.

page 209 note 1 Perhaps π for , i.e. numero.

page 209 note 2 Mommsen gives for No. 25 ad efesius, altered by the first hand to ad efphesius; for No. 26 ad efhesius. He is probably right as to the scribe's having made an alteration : but I think the scribe's first idea must have been efesius or effesius, and his second ephesius, in both cases.