Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:27:51.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two Augustan notes*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Fergus Millar
Affiliation:
The Queen's College, Oxford

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 263 note 1 A start has now been made, for the late first-to early third-century period, by Williams, W., ‘Antoninus Pius and the Control of Provincial Embassies’, Historia xvi (1967), 470Google Scholar. See also some remarks in J.R.S. lvii (1967), 9–10.

page 263 note 2 Millar, F., ‘The Emperor, The Senate and The Provinces’, J.R.S. lvi (1966), 156, esp. p. 163Google Scholar.

page 263 note 3 This is a principal theme of the valuable study by Bowersock, G. W., Augustus and the Greek World (1965)Google Scholar, where, however, the Seleucus dossier is unaccountably ignored, except for a passing reference on p. 89, n. 3.

page 263 note 4 For the general rule that Imperial letters to cities were written in reply to embassies see Millar op. cit., p. 163. The best example of a letter recommending an individual is that of Hadrian to Ephesus recommending a friend, L. Erastus, as bouleutes, Syll.3 838; Abbott and Johnson, Municipal Administration, no. 85.

page 263 note 5 Roussel, P., ‘Un Syrien au service de Rome et d'Octave’, Syria xv (1934), 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar; I.G.L.S. iii. 718.

page 264 note 1 Millar, op. cit., p. 166.

page 264 note 2 O.G.I.S. 262; Abbott and Johnson, Municipal Administration, no. 147.

page 264 note 3 See Welles, C. B., Royal Correspondence in the Hellenistic Period (1934), no. 70.Google Scholar

page 264 note 4 For the alternatives see Williams, op. cit.

page 264 note 5 Pliny, N.H. viii. 218: ‘certum est Baliaricos adversus proventum eorum auxilium militare a divo Augusto petisse.’ A different occasion is probably referred to in Strabo 144: οἱ δ⋯ τ⋯ς Γυμνησ⋯ας οἰκο⋯ντες λ⋯γονται πρεσβε⋯σασθα⋯ ποτε πρ⋯ς ῾Ρωμα⋯ους κατ⋯ χώρας αἴτησιν ⋯κβ⋯λλεσθαι γ⋯ρ ὑπ⋯ τ⋯ν ζῴων το⋯των.

page 264 note 6 Josephus, B.J. ii. 111; A.J. xvii. 342.

page 264 note 7 I.G.R. iv. 1693.

page 264 note 8 Herrmann, P., ‘Inschriften römischer Zeit aus dem Heraion von Samos’, Athenische Mitteilungen lxxv (1960), 68Google Scholar. See L., and Robert, R., Bull. Épig. 1965, 309.Google Scholar

page 265 note 1 Published by A. K. Orlandos in Πρακτικ⋯ 1960 (pub. 1966), p. 215, no. 4, and ‘Δ⋯ο ⋯πιγραφα⋯ ⋯κ Μεσσ⋯νης’, Ἀρχ. Ἐφ. 1965 (pub. 1967), 110.

page 265 note 2 As suggested, for instance, by Jones, A. H. M., Studies in Roman Government and Law (1960), p. 3.Google Scholar

page 265 note 3 R.I.C. i, Augustus, no. 10; Sutherland, C. H. V., Coinage in Roman Imperial Policy (1951), p. 31Google Scholar.

page 265 note 4 Vell. Pat. ii. 89.

page 265 note 5 C.I.L. i2, p. 231: cf. Res Gestae 34.

page 265 note 6 C.I.L. vi. 1527, ii. 35; see Durry, M., Éloge funèbre d'une matrone romaine (éloge dite de Turia) (1950), ad locGoogle Scholar.

page 265 note 7 Dio liii. 21. 6.

page 265 note 8 Dio liii. 13. 2.

page 265 note 9 Suet. Div. Aug. 28. Dio takes up the notion solely to introduce the speeches of Agrippa and Maecenas, lii. I. 1: κα⋯τοι το⋯ Κα⋯σαρος βουλευσαμ⋯νου τ⋯ τε ὅπλα καταθ⋯σθαι κα⋯ τ⋯ πρ⋯γματα τῇ τε γερουσ⋯ᾳ κα⋯ τῷ δ⋯μῳ⋯πιτρ⋯ψαι … See Millar, F., A Study of Cassius Dio (1964), 105.Google Scholar